THERE MUST BE SOME TURMOIL THERE AS THE CY YOUNG AWARD WINNER SCHERZER DID NOT AGREE TO A HUGE CONTRACT EXTENSION LAST WEEK AND THEY WILL WAIT TILL THE END OF THE SEASON.
SO I DO NOT CARE WHAT OUR NUMBERS ARE DETROIT IS OFF LIMITS FOR ME.
VERLANDER WILL START IN THE OPENER
0
I THINK IT IS TIME TO STAY OFF DETROIT.
THERE MUST BE SOME TURMOIL THERE AS THE CY YOUNG AWARD WINNER SCHERZER DID NOT AGREE TO A HUGE CONTRACT EXTENSION LAST WEEK AND THEY WILL WAIT TILL THE END OF THE SEASON.
SO I DO NOT CARE WHAT OUR NUMBERS ARE DETROIT IS OFF LIMITS FOR ME.
hey stevo just got home , was good to meet up with you , always good to put a face to all this mayham. earl sorry i couldn't make it to meet with you and stevo that day but only had the one day to hook up and chat. gl to all and ready to make some money on baseball this week, look forward to your picks stevo
0
hey stevo just got home , was good to meet up with you , always good to put a face to all this mayham. earl sorry i couldn't make it to meet with you and stevo that day but only had the one day to hook up and chat. gl to all and ready to make some money on baseball this week, look forward to your picks stevo
Wow did I have a major come back today. SF was my big play as I had a big positive # for them and Lincecum was pitching and he got blown out and then later they scored 8 runs in the 6th after being down 7-1 and go on to win 13-9 and the Rockies scrape out a tie and could have actually won, so it was a break even day instead of a big loser. Of course I went against the #'s and took NYY when I said that was not the play or I could have been up and then there is Detroit......
We all still let emotions come in to play too much. Should have laid off. Yeah Det killed us all the other day with that 8-1 loss on a 10 star pick. That was a fishy line and I should have known something was up. They were the dog and Scherzer was starting???? That must have been just when his deal fell through. We still have to trust our intuition at times and at other times stick with the #'s even though our emoitions want to go the other way. I guess this why they call it gambling.........but let's try and take most of that out of the equation and we will do great !!
Best to all.
0
Wow did I have a major come back today. SF was my big play as I had a big positive # for them and Lincecum was pitching and he got blown out and then later they scored 8 runs in the 6th after being down 7-1 and go on to win 13-9 and the Rockies scrape out a tie and could have actually won, so it was a break even day instead of a big loser. Of course I went against the #'s and took NYY when I said that was not the play or I could have been up and then there is Detroit......
We all still let emotions come in to play too much. Should have laid off. Yeah Det killed us all the other day with that 8-1 loss on a 10 star pick. That was a fishy line and I should have known something was up. They were the dog and Scherzer was starting???? That must have been just when his deal fell through. We still have to trust our intuition at times and at other times stick with the #'s even though our emoitions want to go the other way. I guess this why they call it gambling.........but let's try and take most of that out of the equation and we will do great !!
Dude its ST and Scherzer only pitched 2/3 inn and unless he allowed a ton of runs he was not the problem ,The entire team was the problem not one Starter....
0
Dude its ST and Scherzer only pitched 2/3 inn and unless he allowed a ton of runs he was not the problem ,The entire team was the problem not one Starter....
Hey steveo... Is there anyway you can list the numbers each day for all the matchups?? I'm picking up on something with the double positives and double negatives.
0
Hey steveo... Is there anyway you can list the numbers each day for all the matchups?? I'm picking up on something with the double positives and double negatives.
Morn boys,,can't sleep as keep reliving that Cinn game as i never saw a 1-9 game out of them,Yes they stink so far in ST but they actually were getting better and cm on they were playing the Brewers another team not doing so well in ST,Then again there were a lot of one sided games yesterday and it shows not many Teams are yet ready for the Season,I guess the real fool is me wagering on these games
0
Morn boys,,can't sleep as keep reliving that Cinn game as i never saw a 1-9 game out of them,Yes they stink so far in ST but they actually were getting better and cm on they were playing the Brewers another team not doing so well in ST,Then again there were a lot of one sided games yesterday and it shows not many Teams are yet ready for the Season,I guess the real fool is me wagering on these games
Actually no you are not the fool. I like you drank a little (ok may be more than a little) too much this last weekend and I think that is why I screwed up yesterday. I did not look at things right as I should have been 6-1-2 instead of 4-5-2. Our numbers were good. I should have been on Miami like most instead of Det and I saw what the numbers were on NYY and still did not go with Toronto. So good thing I got lucky on SF but the numbers were there, so went heavy and pulled the day out.
Really Cinn was the only problem and they had been doing well and we had the numbers (+7 to -1 I believe) but they just let us down.
I am very confident of what you are doing here and it is going to continue to be a great season for all of us.
Thanks again for your great work.
0
Actually no you are not the fool. I like you drank a little (ok may be more than a little) too much this last weekend and I think that is why I screwed up yesterday. I did not look at things right as I should have been 6-1-2 instead of 4-5-2. Our numbers were good. I should have been on Miami like most instead of Det and I saw what the numbers were on NYY and still did not go with Toronto. So good thing I got lucky on SF but the numbers were there, so went heavy and pulled the day out.
Really Cinn was the only problem and they had been doing well and we had the numbers (+7 to -1 I believe) but they just let us down.
I am very confident of what you are doing here and it is going to continue to be a great season for all of us.
2 team 10 unit parlay ( best 2 plays on Board today)
Rays+7 really look good today and Twins -5 just look bad so i can't see Rays losing today
Oakland Likewise as Texas (11-19) can't do anything right IMO
May do a 3 teamer for less as i have no faith in Cinn after yesterday and you can never count out Cleve the way they have done in ST although have slipped some from earlier
in ST
0
2 team 10 unit parlay ( best 2 plays on Board today)
Rays+7 really look good today and Twins -5 just look bad so i can't see Rays losing today
Oakland Likewise as Texas (11-19) can't do anything right IMO
May do a 3 teamer for less as i have no faith in Cinn after yesterday and you can never count out Cleve the way they have done in ST although have slipped some from earlier
hey stevo just got home , was good to meet up with you , always good to put a face to all this mayham. earl sorry i couldn't make it to meet with you and stevo that day but only had the one day to hook up and chat. gl to all and ready to make some money on baseball this week, look forward to your picks stevo
yes we tried but it good to talk to you....we can meet up next time...lets play ball
0
Quote Originally Posted by divotdigger45:
hey stevo just got home , was good to meet up with you , always good to put a face to all this mayham. earl sorry i couldn't make it to meet with you and stevo that day but only had the one day to hook up and chat. gl to all and ready to make some money on baseball this week, look forward to your picks stevo
yes we tried but it good to talk to you....we can meet up next time...lets play ball
stevo , reading between the lines here, seems like you are saying Baltimore, tb, and Oakland are stronger plays, while kc,atl,cle,pit are more of a risk???
0
stevo , reading between the lines here, seems like you are saying Baltimore, tb, and Oakland are stronger plays, while kc,atl,cle,pit are more of a risk???
The best numbers on the board as far as differentials go. Oak is +15 diff and TB is +12 diff. So you have a big edge but still we are all gambling here.
GL !!
0
The best numbers on the board as far as differentials go. Oak is +15 diff and TB is +12 diff. So you have a big edge but still we are all gambling here.
Does anyone have the updated numbers for teams I left out? Here is where we are at so far. I created a spreadsheet with formulas to make this easier in the future but for today can someone help me make this a full card so we can see the stats?
ATLANTA-METS-OAKLAND-SEA-WAS are what needs to be filled in.
CLE=145-129(+16)........Last 2=8-19(-11) **This type of game we will see often. It's a "Double-Negative" situation where both teams last 2 games are in the RED. But, as we can see, CLE has been the better team overall. We assume Cleveland is the play here because it has the better negative number and a + overall number. But, as of now, DO NOT wage on these. Let's see how these pan out more before we wage.
LAA=125-91(+34)..........Last 2=14-8(+6) SF=113-106(+7).......Last 2=21-14(+7) **This type of game we will see often as well. It's a "Double-Positive" situation where both teams last 2 games are positive and overall for the season they are positive. I would assume we would go with the hot hand AS OF LATE in a scenario like this. Unless the overall difference is HUGE. Another wage we should NOT place until we keep track of how these situations pan out.
COL=99-82(+17).............Last 2=5-5(EV)
KC=142-124(+18).......Last 2=17-17(EV) *Double-Even* - KC would be the play we assume because better overall but this is so close you should stay FAR away.
SD=112-126(-14)........Last 2=14-10(+4) CUBS=
TEX=119-156(-37)...........Last 2=11-19(-8) OAK=
CWS=104-134(-30)..........Last 2=10-13(-3) SEA=
Thanks forum. Just trying to help SteveO with some numbers and for all of us to see whats going on here to get a better grasp of all the different scenarios that unfold when looking at these numbers. Let me know what you think
0
Does anyone have the updated numbers for teams I left out? Here is where we are at so far. I created a spreadsheet with formulas to make this easier in the future but for today can someone help me make this a full card so we can see the stats?
ATLANTA-METS-OAKLAND-SEA-WAS are what needs to be filled in.
CLE=145-129(+16)........Last 2=8-19(-11) **This type of game we will see often. It's a "Double-Negative" situation where both teams last 2 games are in the RED. But, as we can see, CLE has been the better team overall. We assume Cleveland is the play here because it has the better negative number and a + overall number. But, as of now, DO NOT wage on these. Let's see how these pan out more before we wage.
LAA=125-91(+34)..........Last 2=14-8(+6) SF=113-106(+7).......Last 2=21-14(+7) **This type of game we will see often as well. It's a "Double-Positive" situation where both teams last 2 games are positive and overall for the season they are positive. I would assume we would go with the hot hand AS OF LATE in a scenario like this. Unless the overall difference is HUGE. Another wage we should NOT place until we keep track of how these situations pan out.
COL=99-82(+17).............Last 2=5-5(EV)
KC=142-124(+18).......Last 2=17-17(EV) *Double-Even* - KC would be the play we assume because better overall but this is so close you should stay FAR away.
SD=112-126(-14)........Last 2=14-10(+4) CUBS=
TEX=119-156(-37)...........Last 2=11-19(-8) OAK=
CWS=104-134(-30)..........Last 2=10-13(-3) SEA=
Thanks forum. Just trying to help SteveO with some numbers and for all of us to see whats going on here to get a better grasp of all the different scenarios that unfold when looking at these numbers. Let me know what you think
Does anyone have the updated numbers for teams I left out? Here is where we are at so far. I created a spreadsheet with formulas to make this easier in the future but for today can someone help me make this a full card so we can see the stats?
ATLANTA-METS-OAKLAND-SEA-WAS are what needs to be filled in.
CLE=145-129(+16)........Last 2=8-19(-11) **This type of game we will see often. It's a "Double-Negative" situation where both teams last 2 games are in the RED. But, as we can see, CLE has been the better team overall. We assume Cleveland is the play here because it has the better negative number and a + overall number. But, as of now, DO NOT wage on these. Let's see how these pan out more before we wage.
LAA=125-91(+34)..........Last 2=14-8(+6) SF=113-106(+7).......Last 2=21-14(+7) **This type of game we will see often as well. It's a "Double-Positive" situation where both teams last 2 games are positive and overall for the season they are positive. I would assume we would go with the hot hand AS OF LATE in a scenario like this. Unless the overall difference is HUGE. Another wage we should NOT place until we keep track of how these situations pan out.
COL=99-82(+17).............Last 2=5-5(EV)
KC=142-124(+18).......Last 2=17-17(EV) *Double-Even* - KC would be the play we assume because better overall but this is so close you should stay FAR away.
SD=112-126(-14)........Last 2=14-10(+4) CUBS=
TEX=119-156(-37)...........Last 2=11-19(-8) OAK=
CWS=104-134(-30)..........Last 2=10-13(-3) SEA=
Thanks forum. Just trying to help SteveO with some numbers and for all of us to see whats going on here to get a better grasp of all the different scenarios that unfold when looking at these numbers. Let me know what you think
0
Quote Originally Posted by brendanmc:
Does anyone have the updated numbers for teams I left out? Here is where we are at so far. I created a spreadsheet with formulas to make this easier in the future but for today can someone help me make this a full card so we can see the stats?
ATLANTA-METS-OAKLAND-SEA-WAS are what needs to be filled in.
CLE=145-129(+16)........Last 2=8-19(-11) **This type of game we will see often. It's a "Double-Negative" situation where both teams last 2 games are in the RED. But, as we can see, CLE has been the better team overall. We assume Cleveland is the play here because it has the better negative number and a + overall number. But, as of now, DO NOT wage on these. Let's see how these pan out more before we wage.
LAA=125-91(+34)..........Last 2=14-8(+6) SF=113-106(+7).......Last 2=21-14(+7) **This type of game we will see often as well. It's a "Double-Positive" situation where both teams last 2 games are positive and overall for the season they are positive. I would assume we would go with the hot hand AS OF LATE in a scenario like this. Unless the overall difference is HUGE. Another wage we should NOT place until we keep track of how these situations pan out.
COL=99-82(+17).............Last 2=5-5(EV)
KC=142-124(+18).......Last 2=17-17(EV) *Double-Even* - KC would be the play we assume because better overall but this is so close you should stay FAR away.
SD=112-126(-14)........Last 2=14-10(+4) CUBS=
TEX=119-156(-37)...........Last 2=11-19(-8) OAK=
CWS=104-134(-30)..........Last 2=10-13(-3) SEA=
Thanks forum. Just trying to help SteveO with some numbers and for all of us to see whats going on here to get a better grasp of all the different scenarios that unfold when looking at these numbers. Let me know what you think
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Established in 1995,
see you i a couple hours,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
Hot Forum Topics
