Could be wrong about anything this time of year but I think both Tillman
and the Orioles are in for a long haul, and I project them at the bottom of the
A.L. East. Tillman gave a quality effort in only 43% of his 30 starts last year
and failed to impress in ST with a 7.24 era and .345 opponent batting average.
Santana is the correct choice for top of the rotation for the Twins and gave a
quality effort in 59% of his 17 starts last year. He looked pretty darn good
this spring with a 1.77 era and .173 opponent batting average. The hitters park
favors the better pitching/hitting team and the Twins are both.
Possibly one more later, I am still hard at work on that for those that
keep the faith.
.
Now and then even a BLIND squirrel can find an acorn
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
MLB – 2016
0-1, -200
4/4
Twins +118, Santana/Tillman
Could be wrong about anything this time of year but I think both Tillman
and the Orioles are in for a long haul, and I project them at the bottom of the
A.L. East. Tillman gave a quality effort in only 43% of his 30 starts last year
and failed to impress in ST with a 7.24 era and .345 opponent batting average.
Santana is the correct choice for top of the rotation for the Twins and gave a
quality effort in 59% of his 17 starts last year. He looked pretty darn good
this spring with a 1.77 era and .173 opponent batting average. The hitters park
favors the better pitching/hitting team and the Twins are both.
Possibly one more later, I am still hard at work on that for those that
keep the faith.
There are so few genuine handicappers on this site now, just waves of guys regurgitating that Vegas trap/public/sharp crap..you're one of the good guys, and I learned a lot from you and a couple of guys no longer here.
All the best this season!
0
Good luck to you this year Mr Element
There are so few genuine handicappers on this site now, just waves of guys regurgitating that Vegas trap/public/sharp crap..you're one of the good guys, and I learned a lot from you and a couple of guys no longer here.
Until further notice all wagers are a FLAT $200. Sorry I forgot to insert that but it is my standard procedure at the start of the season.
What I really suggest followers do is determine what percentage of my wagers is right for them and their individual bankroll and play that percentage. If say a guy only wants to wager $20 per game just use 10% of whatever I am playing.
Now and then even a BLIND squirrel can find an acorn
0
Until further notice all wagers are a FLAT $200. Sorry I forgot to insert that but it is my standard procedure at the start of the season.
What I really suggest followers do is determine what percentage of my wagers is right for them and their individual bankroll and play that percentage. If say a guy only wants to wager $20 per game just use 10% of whatever I am playing.
Something is making me think Minnesota will win today, but I don't know why. I think Baltimore is the better team, I was going to bet on them ML. But I think the over is a good bet. Good luck today!
0
Something is making me think Minnesota will win today, but I don't know why. I think Baltimore is the better team, I was going to bet on them ML. But I think the over is a good bet. Good luck today!
What I actually wager you have no way to verify, including posting tickets, which is a sham, because any good word processing system makes it possible to edit the ticket.
A guy can bet $20 and make his ticket read $2,000 before he posts it. Don't fall for that crap.
On this site I start each season with a $10,000.00 bankroll and wager 2% on the early (April) picks, and that keeps the records in line. Follow along, Winning (or losing) justifies both larger (or smaller) wagers and also an adjustment in the percentage of bankroll played. The 2% itself is adjustable by the consistency achieved.
As I stated, my play size is not verifiable, and I won't blow smoke, but I will admit to occasionally moving a line by myself.
Now and then even a BLIND squirrel can find an acorn
0
Quote Originally Posted by guyhopestowin:
thanks key, how much do you risk?
What I actually wager you have no way to verify, including posting tickets, which is a sham, because any good word processing system makes it possible to edit the ticket.
A guy can bet $20 and make his ticket read $2,000 before he posts it. Don't fall for that crap.
On this site I start each season with a $10,000.00 bankroll and wager 2% on the early (April) picks, and that keeps the records in line. Follow along, Winning (or losing) justifies both larger (or smaller) wagers and also an adjustment in the percentage of bankroll played. The 2% itself is adjustable by the consistency achieved.
As I stated, my play size is not verifiable, and I won't blow smoke, but I will admit to occasionally moving a line by myself.
Santana is junk---Pure Junk--Tillman has completely underperformed since a solid 2014----I am not saying the O's definitely win this...but no way could I back Santana and the twins here......I agree with the over, barring crazy weather affecting the game I see it 7-4 Orioles...bol to all though. Personally not touching it..
0
Santana is junk---Pure Junk--Tillman has completely underperformed since a solid 2014----I am not saying the O's definitely win this...but no way could I back Santana and the twins here......I agree with the over, barring crazy weather affecting the game I see it 7-4 Orioles...bol to all though. Personally not touching it..
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.