"It's not 19 or 20 because sure everyone is going to jump on the under BUT 15.5 attracts enough money on both sides so that the book/Vegas gets action on both sides which is what they want." book sets a
Wasting your breath. I have been telling them that for 14 years and 90% of Covers still think the book sets a price to BEAT THEM! Like he wants to gamble against his customers because he knows what will really happen. Try to explain that successful books are not gamblers, but brokers, and you will further waste your breath.
Now and then even a BLIND squirrel can find an acorn
0
@GMoneyGTown
"It's not 19 or 20 because sure everyone is going to jump on the under BUT 15.5 attracts enough money on both sides so that the book/Vegas gets action on both sides which is what they want." book sets a
Wasting your breath. I have been telling them that for 14 years and 90% of Covers still think the book sets a price to BEAT THEM! Like he wants to gamble against his customers because he knows what will really happen. Try to explain that successful books are not gamblers, but brokers, and you will further waste your breath.
Big baller like yourself having trouble with the books putting out that line.You seemed like you thought it was an error and did not realize it was in Mexico.
3
@KeyElement
Big baller like yourself having trouble with the books putting out that line.You seemed like you thought it was an error and did not realize it was in Mexico.
Agreed any good handicapper would factor in the conditions, and not just say the ball Has to be hit hard and elevated. Public drooled at line, but Vegas knows!
0
@bonfire69
Agreed any good handicapper would factor in the conditions, and not just say the ball Has to be hit hard and elevated. Public drooled at line, but Vegas knows!
@KeyElement Big baller like yourself having trouble with the books putting out that line.You seemed like you thought it was an error and did not realize it was in Mexico.
he got u there key
eating chicken dinners all day everyday
1
Quote Originally Posted by bonfire69:
@KeyElement Big baller like yourself having trouble with the books putting out that line.You seemed like you thought it was an error and did not realize it was in Mexico.
They will probably wake up and correct it, but my book and quite a few others have posted a total of 15 on the Giants/Padres game. Manaea/Musgrove vs. no big deal offenses? That makes no sense. The under could lose, but it is highly unlikely. I entered the under myself for a substantial play. Good luck if you can get it, cheers if your bookie pays off.
Quote Originally Posted by KeyElement:
@Chasin I wasn't going to play that game, and I am sure the books will catch it and cancel, but I gave it a shot. If they keep it up there and have to pay on the over, I am done with gambling. There is no explanation for that line.
So, you done yet bruh? Hopefully you learned a little something - this has happened to all of us at some point. You wake up, see a line that just looks completely ridiculous, react to it, and then find out later that it was completely justified. Oddsmakers aren't stupid and they aren't in the business of losing money. So if at first it looks like they made a mistake, look again, and then look a 3rd and 4th time before pulling the trigger on anything.
God is great, beer is good, and people are crazy.
2
Quote Originally Posted by KeyElement:
They will probably wake up and correct it, but my book and quite a few others have posted a total of 15 on the Giants/Padres game. Manaea/Musgrove vs. no big deal offenses? That makes no sense. The under could lose, but it is highly unlikely. I entered the under myself for a substantial play. Good luck if you can get it, cheers if your bookie pays off.
Quote Originally Posted by KeyElement:
@Chasin I wasn't going to play that game, and I am sure the books will catch it and cancel, but I gave it a shot. If they keep it up there and have to pay on the over, I am done with gambling. There is no explanation for that line.
So, you done yet bruh? Hopefully you learned a little something - this has happened to all of us at some point. You wake up, see a line that just looks completely ridiculous, react to it, and then find out later that it was completely justified. Oddsmakers aren't stupid and they aren't in the business of losing money. So if at first it looks like they made a mistake, look again, and then look a 3rd and 4th time before pulling the trigger on anything.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Hot Forum Topics
