All Forums | MLB Betting

Beat the sweep system

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 173661
Posts: 1476
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2013
Posts: 35
Posted: #1026
Ask and ye shall receive 
Brad. My apologies for you getting blamed 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2006
Posts: 296
Posted: #1027
I love how this thread is mainly sh*t talk now.

Since learning about this system I've been tracking for the past month or so. Definitely some solid results - 36-3 overall with 2 of the 3 losses coming on real borderline plays. Baltimore last weekend against Cubs and CWS who technically qualified but b/c of their crappy overall record I sort of take it with a grain of salt.

I've seen that qualified teams aren't performing real well in game 1 at all (last night perfect example - maybe Vegas is overpricing the lines?) but the return in game 2 on qualified teams that lost is game 1 is solid. BOL to everyone tailing the game 2s (or game 3 for LAD) today. And anyone who has been tricking results similarly in excel or wherever and wants to trade notes feel free to reach out.

And definitely keep the fighting going and sh*t talk, it's hilarious to read through.
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2017
Posts: 615
Posted: #1028
Quote Originally Posted by Big_Tone21:

Haha what does that even mean? Pretty sure i don't have admin abilities in this forum.


It's good to know covers can, and will, penalize the trolls.
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2017
Posts: 615
Posted: #1029
Cleared
HOU
KC

Chasing game 2's
CHC
COL

Chasing game 3
LAD
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2017
Posts: 615
Posted: #1030
Also chasing game 2
MIL
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2017
Posts: 615
Posted: #1031
Cleared
HOU
KC
LAD
COL
CHC
MIL

+11 units
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2009
Posts: 466
Posted: #1032
Great night for the system! 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2017
Posts: 64
Posted: #1033
Will the rays beat the sweep? They keep playing with my emotions....
Gotta lay the juice on dodgers today missed out on last nights game
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2017
Posts: 375
Posted: #1034
Quote Originally Posted by therealdutch:

COL
CHC
LAD chase

TB fits, but they're playing the GD Rangers, so i'm not touching that one

BOL

Good call not touching the Rays vs Rangers! Just curious on what made you decide to lay off?
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2017
Posts: 497
Posted: #1035
Quote Originally Posted by SBT:

Quote Originally Posted by therealdutch:

COLCHCLAD chaseTB fits, but they're playing the GD Rangers, so i'm not touching that oneBOL
Good call not touching the Rays vs Rangers! Just curious on what made you decide to lay off?

I am in Dallas. I've seen the rangers go 5-1, then 1-6, then 6-0. And these swings arent against lopsided teams. They rattled off a sweep at Washington and then took a series at Houston. Then they will turn around and lose against crap teams. I just don't touch em. Look at other systems. In the post all star break system they are the only loss going back like 10 years. Maybe it's home town bias I just don't like to play em because they get streaky.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2013
Posts: 35
Posted: #1036
System as I see it. …
COL/STL.  both meet system = no play
ARI = yes
DET = yes
TB =yes
SEA = on fence. ( BOS.  RW >.500)
CHC. = yes
HOU = yes ( away)
TEX = yes
LAD = fence ( min. RW >.500 ) ( personal COLON CURSE for me)
         No play.  Lol 

 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2017
Posts: 615
Posted: #1037
I'm on -
1 unit:
CHC
(A) HOU
TB
CLE
AZ
LAD


.5 units:
TOR
PIT
(A) BOS



 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2017
Posts: 2838
Posted: #1038
 Remember, the Cubs are 2 at Wrigley, then 2 at the Cell.
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2017
Posts: 615
Posted: #1039
I took that into consideration. I ultimately decided to go with it. Cubs have figured some things out and made a trade to better the team now. Ill take my chances
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2017
Posts: 615
Posted: #1040
Quote Originally Posted by Boston_Brad:

I'm on -1 unit:CHC (A) HOUTBCLEAZLAD.5 units:TORPIT(A) BOS


PIT is (A) too
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2016
Posts: 407
Posted: #1041
Great start boys.  5-1 to start the chase.  

CLE, TOR, HOU, AZ, LAD all winners; TB loss.

I stayed away from PITT (want to be a lot more selective with away teams) but that pick won. Was NOT on Boston.

What are we seeing on new series starting today?

 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2017
Posts: 615
Posted: #1042
I'm not on any new series today.

Chasing game 2's
CHC
TB
BOS

No need to force play, Tone. Chasing one game to be up 6units is not a bad position to be in.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2009
Posts: 2065
Posted: #1043
Cleveland was a one game series. Were you just gonna roll that into the next if it lost?

LAD was playing against MIN who is over 500 and over 500 on the road? Curious why you rolled with that one. Just cause it's the dodgers.

Peace




 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2009
Posts: 2065
Posted: #1044
Also curious why you took an away team at 500 on the road in Boston vs a home team that is over 500 at home in Seattle. Just trust Seattle I guess? I would think the home team would be the choice there as the system is really to favor the home team. 
I have been playing along for a month and fully get the system, just trying to figure the above out. I skipped LAD because of MINs road record and took Seattle bc of their home record.

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2009
Posts: 2065
Posted: #1045
*NOT trust seattle
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2017
Posts: 615
Posted: #1046
Quote Originally Posted by nolemonasses:

Cleveland was a one game series. Were you just gonna roll that into the next if it lost?LAD was playing against MIN who is over 500 and over 500 on the road? Curious why you rolled with that one. Just cause it's the dodgers.Peace


I didn't realize it was a one game play until it was too late. Thankfully they still won and I can avoid them again till the weekend series begins.

I went with LAD as a gut call. I liked their 9-3 interleague record heading into last night; the best team in baseball; Bartolo on the mound.
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2017
Posts: 615
Posted: #1047
Boston over Seattle was another gut call. I guess you could call that a homer play
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2017
Posts: 615
Posted: #1048
Quote Originally Posted by Boston_Brad:

Boston over Seattle was another gut call. I guess you could call that a homer play

I also liked the plus money for games 1&2 and Sale going in game 3 should I need it.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2009
Posts: 2065
Posted: #1049
Gotcha
 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2009
Posts: 2065
Posted: #1050
Brad, it's kinda weird, the sox are in first yet I don't trust them right now and I don't know why. I mean, they are leading the division after all. They need a spark and I'm curious to see what the rookie 3rd baseman call up does.

All Forums | MLB Betting
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.