Picks of the Day Record (New) YTD: 3-1-0 (75%) *** +54.78% Return on Risk *** ML: 0-0 (0%) RL: 0-1 (0%) O/U: 2-0-0 (100%) F5: 1-0-0 (100%)
Yesterday, 7/10/2014 Record: 6-6-0 (50%) Risked / To Win: 11.00 Units / 10.49 Units (avg. line of -105) Profit: +1.48 Units / +$28.88 Return on Risk: +13.50% https://www.covers.com/postingforum/post01/showmessage.aspx?spt=27&sub=101915472
Bet Sizing: 1 Unit is 1% of my bankroll (~$20 as of today). Admittedly, I place relatively small wagers in comparison to other bettors on individual plays. But, to put things into perspective, if you were a dime bettor and followed all of my plays you would be up $42,158 on the season based on my return on risk performance.
Number of plays: I have received some feedback regarding the amount of action (plays) I have each day. I often elect to spread my risk out by selecting wagers that express the same view. So, while the number of bets might seem high, 2-3 plays on the same game can often be consolidated into 1 play with more concentrated risk. For example, sometimes I split my risk between the first 5 innings and the full game while also placing a wager on the run total.
Diversification/Money Management: Remember, you can express a view in a number of ways and it's about finding the cheapest way with the best risk/reward profile. Don't fall into the trap of putting too much risk in one place. You (and I) will lose "sure thing" wagers, so limiting the damage from one pick is imperative. If there is one takeaway this is it. Diversification is key to money management. There's a reason why I have placed nearly 1,000 wagers this season and still have my original bankroll (and some profit) to play with in the second half! As the season goes on, I will begin wagering plays with higher payouts but only with a portion of my profit.
Pick of the Day (POD) / Regular Play (RP): Going forward I will color code my plays to differentiate between my favorite plays (orange) and my regular value plays (blue). I won't necessarily size any differently. A few people approached me and asked me to do this, so I am going to try it out for the second half of the season. Maybe I will discover something that I can incorporate for the next season.
Picks of the Day Record (New) YTD: 3-1-0 (75%) *** +54.78% Return on Risk *** ML: 0-0 (0%) RL: 0-1 (0%) O/U: 2-0-0 (100%) F5: 1-0-0 (100%)
Yesterday, 7/10/2014 Record: 6-6-0 (50%) Risked / To Win: 11.00 Units / 10.49 Units (avg. line of -105) Profit: +1.48 Units / +$28.88 Return on Risk: +13.50% https://www.covers.com/postingforum/post01/showmessage.aspx?spt=27&sub=101915472
Bet Sizing: 1 Unit is 1% of my bankroll (~$20 as of today). Admittedly, I place relatively small wagers in comparison to other bettors on individual plays. But, to put things into perspective, if you were a dime bettor and followed all of my plays you would be up $42,158 on the season based on my return on risk performance.
Number of plays: I have received some feedback regarding the amount of action (plays) I have each day. I often elect to spread my risk out by selecting wagers that express the same view. So, while the number of bets might seem high, 2-3 plays on the same game can often be consolidated into 1 play with more concentrated risk. For example, sometimes I split my risk between the first 5 innings and the full game while also placing a wager on the run total.
Diversification/Money Management: Remember, you can express a view in a number of ways and it's about finding the cheapest way with the best risk/reward profile. Don't fall into the trap of putting too much risk in one place. You (and I) will lose "sure thing" wagers, so limiting the damage from one pick is imperative. If there is one takeaway this is it. Diversification is key to money management. There's a reason why I have placed nearly 1,000 wagers this season and still have my original bankroll (and some profit) to play with in the second half! As the season goes on, I will begin wagering plays with higher payouts but only with a portion of my profit.
Pick of the Day (POD) / Regular Play (RP): Going forward I will color code my plays to differentiate between my favorite plays (orange) and my regular value plays (blue). I won't necessarily size any differently. A few people approached me and asked me to do this, so I am going to try it out for the second half of the season. Maybe I will discover something that I can incorporate for the next season.
Some
of these plays were wagered last night and the lines have moved. The F5
plays are new and the lines should still be good. Remember, it takes
time to write these up! Sides
Detroit Tigers F5 (-119) --- 0.75 Units / 0.75% of Bankroll Detroit Tigers ML (-114) --- 0.75 Units / 0.75% of Bankroll Since 2011, Anibal Sanchez has dominated the Royals, posting a 4-2 record in 6 starts with a 1.25 ERA.
The Tigers are 4-1 in Sanchez's last 5 starts vs. the Royals. On the
other hand, Danny Duffy is 1-2 in his last 4 starts, with the Royals
going 2-2, versus the Tigers.
The Tigers are red hot, and have won 15 of their last 20 games.
It's no secret that Sanchez has the best stuff on Detroit's staff. Give
me the hottest team in baseball behind a pitcher of Sanchez's calibre -
at near even money - any day of the week. For what it's worth, I came up with a -160 fair value line for this game.
For
the run totals bettors: while this game certainly points to the under,
the Tigers offense can explode at a moments notice and put up crooked
numbers. If the team total O/U for the Royals is 3.5 runs (I
assume it will be) and it is -125 or lower, there could be value in
taking the under.
Update: the team total lines just came out and the under for KC is 3.5 (-105). This could be worst exploring.
Boston Red Sox ML (-122) --- 1.50 Units / 1.50% of Bankroll For
one, the Red Sox are 10-8 (56%) this season in games started by John
Lackey. A line of -122 implies a 55% probability. An immediate value
signal here, as most of these starts were against teams superior to that
of the Houston Astros. Two, Lackey was 1-1 last season with a 2.25 ERA
in 2 starts vs. the Astros. Lastly, I know the Red Sox have been
struggling as of late, but I cannot pass up Lackey against a last place
team inside of -150.
Basically, I feel the Red Sox win this game
more than 5 times every 9 games (implied odds in the money line). Think
of it this way. Pretend this is the ALCS (7 game series) and that
only these two starts would go head to head with normal rest at
Houston. Would you bet your money that the Astros would take the series?
If not, then you take the Red Sox in this game. Why? Because, even if
it went to 7 games, if the Red Sox win 4 out of 7, then that implies
they would win 57% of the 7 games played in the series which is greater
than the odds implied by the line played tomorrow.
I
get that this isn't last year's world championship team. However, I will
certainly dabble on the Red Sox when Lackey or Lester take the mound. The Red Sox are 22-15 (0.595) in games started by Lackey/Lester and 19-36 (0.352) in games started by anyone else.
For the season, in Red Sox games (either side) I have a 61% hit rate
and 11.2% return on risk; yes, I track very detailed records so I know
what I am good at and bad at!
In contrast to Lackey/Lester,
Feldman does not dramatically improve his team's chance of winning. The
Astros are 6-9 (0.400) in Feldman's 15 starts and 39-59 (0.419) overall.
Los Angeles Angels ML (-159) --- 1.50 Units / 1.50% of Bankroll No
need to overthink this one. People are finally starting to realize that
Richards is the ace of the Angels' staff. In my opinion, he is one of
the best righties in the AL. This is a complete mismatch on the starting
pitching front, and the Angels are 14-4 in Richards' 18 starts this
season. Richards has actually pitched better on the road this season,
going 5-1 in 10 starts with a 2.04 ERA. The Angels are 8-2 in his road
starts, with the only losses coming at Oakland and New York.
The
Angels have already beaten the Rangers behind Richards twice on the
season and Tepesch is a 4th/5th starter on a medicore team at best. The
Angels are hot, hot, hot, and laying runs on their opposition at a
dizzying rate. Righties, lefties, it doesnt matter. They keep hitting.
In fact, the Angels have scored 5+ runs in 16 of their last 19 games.
Think about that for a moment.
Seattle Mariners F5 (-131) --- 1.50 Units / 1.50% of Bankroll Seattle Mariners -1.5 RL (+175) --- 0.50 Units / 0.50% of Bankroll At the end of the day, the Mariners have been playing very good baseball over the last 6-8 weeks and have won 23 of their last 38 games (0.605). Seattle is 3-0 this season vs. Oakland with Felix on the mound and 5-1 in his last 6 starts vs. Oakland.
I think Jeff S. is a very good pitcher and clearly Oakland is a top
notch team, but Samardzija isn't even in the same league as Felix when
it comes to pure stuff and ability. Samardzija is a top end number 2
pitcher, while Felix is a tier-1 Ace.
The next factor is that is
can be argued - without much digging - that the A's are one of the top 4
teams in all of baseball. They beat the Mariners in a 7 game series
more often than not because they have more weapons and ways to win.
However, Seattle is not a pushover and they are not the same team that
lost 178 games in 2012/2013 combined. This year's Seattle team is an
improved team. They have the lowest bullpen ERA in all of MLB,
which is (i) impressive in its own right since they are an AL team and
(ii) more than half a run lower than the next closest team in the AL.
The Mariners are also averaging ~0.2 more runs scored per game
I independently calculated a moneyline of approx. -150, so I see value in the moneyline at -125 (current FG ML). However, I see more line value in the -1.5 RL @ +175 and will put a small wager on it as my RL pick of the day.With
a pitcher like Hernandez on the mound, a legitimate -150 home favorite -
which I think the Mariners are - should have a run line between +110
and +130 depending on the opposing pitcher.
King Felix last two seasons vs. Oakland: ML: 5-1 (83%) -1.5 RL: 5-1 (83%)
You
don't have to believe the Mariners will win by 2+ runs tonight to place
this wager. Personally, I don't think the RL hits more than 50% of the
time, but I definitely feel it happens more than 37% (RL implied
probability) of the time.
0
Friday's Card, 7/11/2014
Some
of these plays were wagered last night and the lines have moved. The F5
plays are new and the lines should still be good. Remember, it takes
time to write these up! Sides
Detroit Tigers F5 (-119) --- 0.75 Units / 0.75% of Bankroll Detroit Tigers ML (-114) --- 0.75 Units / 0.75% of Bankroll Since 2011, Anibal Sanchez has dominated the Royals, posting a 4-2 record in 6 starts with a 1.25 ERA.
The Tigers are 4-1 in Sanchez's last 5 starts vs. the Royals. On the
other hand, Danny Duffy is 1-2 in his last 4 starts, with the Royals
going 2-2, versus the Tigers.
The Tigers are red hot, and have won 15 of their last 20 games.
It's no secret that Sanchez has the best stuff on Detroit's staff. Give
me the hottest team in baseball behind a pitcher of Sanchez's calibre -
at near even money - any day of the week. For what it's worth, I came up with a -160 fair value line for this game.
For
the run totals bettors: while this game certainly points to the under,
the Tigers offense can explode at a moments notice and put up crooked
numbers. If the team total O/U for the Royals is 3.5 runs (I
assume it will be) and it is -125 or lower, there could be value in
taking the under.
Update: the team total lines just came out and the under for KC is 3.5 (-105). This could be worst exploring.
Boston Red Sox ML (-122) --- 1.50 Units / 1.50% of Bankroll For
one, the Red Sox are 10-8 (56%) this season in games started by John
Lackey. A line of -122 implies a 55% probability. An immediate value
signal here, as most of these starts were against teams superior to that
of the Houston Astros. Two, Lackey was 1-1 last season with a 2.25 ERA
in 2 starts vs. the Astros. Lastly, I know the Red Sox have been
struggling as of late, but I cannot pass up Lackey against a last place
team inside of -150.
Basically, I feel the Red Sox win this game
more than 5 times every 9 games (implied odds in the money line). Think
of it this way. Pretend this is the ALCS (7 game series) and that
only these two starts would go head to head with normal rest at
Houston. Would you bet your money that the Astros would take the series?
If not, then you take the Red Sox in this game. Why? Because, even if
it went to 7 games, if the Red Sox win 4 out of 7, then that implies
they would win 57% of the 7 games played in the series which is greater
than the odds implied by the line played tomorrow.
I
get that this isn't last year's world championship team. However, I will
certainly dabble on the Red Sox when Lackey or Lester take the mound. The Red Sox are 22-15 (0.595) in games started by Lackey/Lester and 19-36 (0.352) in games started by anyone else.
For the season, in Red Sox games (either side) I have a 61% hit rate
and 11.2% return on risk; yes, I track very detailed records so I know
what I am good at and bad at!
In contrast to Lackey/Lester,
Feldman does not dramatically improve his team's chance of winning. The
Astros are 6-9 (0.400) in Feldman's 15 starts and 39-59 (0.419) overall.
Los Angeles Angels ML (-159) --- 1.50 Units / 1.50% of Bankroll No
need to overthink this one. People are finally starting to realize that
Richards is the ace of the Angels' staff. In my opinion, he is one of
the best righties in the AL. This is a complete mismatch on the starting
pitching front, and the Angels are 14-4 in Richards' 18 starts this
season. Richards has actually pitched better on the road this season,
going 5-1 in 10 starts with a 2.04 ERA. The Angels are 8-2 in his road
starts, with the only losses coming at Oakland and New York.
The
Angels have already beaten the Rangers behind Richards twice on the
season and Tepesch is a 4th/5th starter on a medicore team at best. The
Angels are hot, hot, hot, and laying runs on their opposition at a
dizzying rate. Righties, lefties, it doesnt matter. They keep hitting.
In fact, the Angels have scored 5+ runs in 16 of their last 19 games.
Think about that for a moment.
Seattle Mariners F5 (-131) --- 1.50 Units / 1.50% of Bankroll Seattle Mariners -1.5 RL (+175) --- 0.50 Units / 0.50% of Bankroll At the end of the day, the Mariners have been playing very good baseball over the last 6-8 weeks and have won 23 of their last 38 games (0.605). Seattle is 3-0 this season vs. Oakland with Felix on the mound and 5-1 in his last 6 starts vs. Oakland.
I think Jeff S. is a very good pitcher and clearly Oakland is a top
notch team, but Samardzija isn't even in the same league as Felix when
it comes to pure stuff and ability. Samardzija is a top end number 2
pitcher, while Felix is a tier-1 Ace.
The next factor is that is
can be argued - without much digging - that the A's are one of the top 4
teams in all of baseball. They beat the Mariners in a 7 game series
more often than not because they have more weapons and ways to win.
However, Seattle is not a pushover and they are not the same team that
lost 178 games in 2012/2013 combined. This year's Seattle team is an
improved team. They have the lowest bullpen ERA in all of MLB,
which is (i) impressive in its own right since they are an AL team and
(ii) more than half a run lower than the next closest team in the AL.
The Mariners are also averaging ~0.2 more runs scored per game
I independently calculated a moneyline of approx. -150, so I see value in the moneyline at -125 (current FG ML). However, I see more line value in the -1.5 RL @ +175 and will put a small wager on it as my RL pick of the day.With
a pitcher like Hernandez on the mound, a legitimate -150 home favorite -
which I think the Mariners are - should have a run line between +110
and +130 depending on the opposing pitcher.
King Felix last two seasons vs. Oakland: ML: 5-1 (83%) -1.5 RL: 5-1 (83%)
You
don't have to believe the Mariners will win by 2+ runs tonight to place
this wager. Personally, I don't think the RL hits more than 50% of the
time, but I definitely feel it happens more than 37% (RL implied
probability) of the time.
Atlanta/Chicago Under 4 F5 (-120) --- 0.75 Units / 0.75% of Bankroll Atlanta/Chicago Under 7 (+110) --- 0.75 Units / 0.75% of Bankroll For the season, the total has been 7 or fewer runs in 7 of Wood's 10 starts (70%) and in 10 of Arrieta's 12 starts (83%).
The F5 under line is 3.5 runs at +105, but I bought the extra half run.
I still like the under on 3.5, but I see 5 runs as a rather remote
outcome and I can still get a wash if we see 4 runs.
Miami/New York Under 7 (-105) --- 1.00 Units / 1.00% of Bankroll The run total has been 7 or under in 11 of Alvarez's 18 starts (61%) and in 9 of Wheeler's 18 starts (50%). Moreover, of the 10 times these two teams have met this season the run total has exceeded 7 runs only 2 times (i.e.,
80% fewer than or equal to 7 runs 80% of the time). The run total has
been 7 or fewer in Alvarez's last 5 starts vs. the Mets. All 4 of
Wheeler's career starts versus Miami have seen the run total lower than 7
runs.
St. Louis/Milwaukee Over 7.5 (-120) --- 1.00 Units / 1.00% of Bankroll I have said this before, but I will say it again. Every pitcher has a team that they cannot shake. Well, the Cardinals have Gallardo's number. He is 1-7 with an ERA close to 7 in his last 11 starts versus St. Louis. The run total has exceed 7.5 runs in his last 7 starts versus the Cardinals.
Aside from having rather mediocre vs. Milwaukee, Joe Kelley will be
making his first start coming off the DL and will be on a low pitch
count. This means the Cardinals' bullpen, which has been less than
desirable as of late, will get the nod early in the game. Despite both
offenses struggling, I still like the over on this one.
Pittsburgh/Cincinnati Under 4 F5 (-125) --- 1.00 Units / 1.00% of Bankroll The
under 4 F5 is 4-1-0 in Latos' first 5 starts (80%) and 2-3-2 in Locke's
7 starts (40%) this season. Cincinnati struggles vs. lefties and Latos
has a BAA of .194 vs. the Pirates. In Locke's last 5 starts against the
Reds, the run total has been 7 or fewer in 4 games (80%) and he has a
BAA of .225 against the Reds.
0
Totals
Atlanta/Chicago Under 4 F5 (-120) --- 0.75 Units / 0.75% of Bankroll Atlanta/Chicago Under 7 (+110) --- 0.75 Units / 0.75% of Bankroll For the season, the total has been 7 or fewer runs in 7 of Wood's 10 starts (70%) and in 10 of Arrieta's 12 starts (83%).
The F5 under line is 3.5 runs at +105, but I bought the extra half run.
I still like the under on 3.5, but I see 5 runs as a rather remote
outcome and I can still get a wash if we see 4 runs.
Miami/New York Under 7 (-105) --- 1.00 Units / 1.00% of Bankroll The run total has been 7 or under in 11 of Alvarez's 18 starts (61%) and in 9 of Wheeler's 18 starts (50%). Moreover, of the 10 times these two teams have met this season the run total has exceeded 7 runs only 2 times (i.e.,
80% fewer than or equal to 7 runs 80% of the time). The run total has
been 7 or fewer in Alvarez's last 5 starts vs. the Mets. All 4 of
Wheeler's career starts versus Miami have seen the run total lower than 7
runs.
St. Louis/Milwaukee Over 7.5 (-120) --- 1.00 Units / 1.00% of Bankroll I have said this before, but I will say it again. Every pitcher has a team that they cannot shake. Well, the Cardinals have Gallardo's number. He is 1-7 with an ERA close to 7 in his last 11 starts versus St. Louis. The run total has exceed 7.5 runs in his last 7 starts versus the Cardinals.
Aside from having rather mediocre vs. Milwaukee, Joe Kelley will be
making his first start coming off the DL and will be on a low pitch
count. This means the Cardinals' bullpen, which has been less than
desirable as of late, will get the nod early in the game. Despite both
offenses struggling, I still like the over on this one.
Pittsburgh/Cincinnati Under 4 F5 (-125) --- 1.00 Units / 1.00% of Bankroll The
under 4 F5 is 4-1-0 in Latos' first 5 starts (80%) and 2-3-2 in Locke's
7 starts (40%) this season. Cincinnati struggles vs. lefties and Latos
has a BAA of .194 vs. the Pirates. In Locke's last 5 starts against the
Reds, the run total has been 7 or fewer in 4 games (80%) and he has a
BAA of .225 against the Reds.
Goes without saying really, but best of luck BirdsOnBats! Tough break on the Cubs F5 under though.
I'm on both Detroit and Angels as you know and like both picks. I was thinking of jumping on Angels F5, but by the time I could log in today it was -190.
I did jump on the Mariners RL +165 and over 7 1/2 for St. Louis.
0
Goes without saying really, but best of luck BirdsOnBats! Tough break on the Cubs F5 under though.
I'm on both Detroit and Angels as you know and like both picks. I was thinking of jumping on Angels F5, but by the time I could log in today it was -190.
I did jump on the Mariners RL +165 and over 7 1/2 for St. Louis.
lost the under 7 with 2 outs in the 9th… The Braves are my nemesis when it comes to MLB betting!
on that note, with the line movement in the Detroit/Kansas City run total line I am thinking about putting one last wager on… finalizing whether i will pull the trigger
0
lost the under 7 with 2 outs in the 9th… The Braves are my nemesis when it comes to MLB betting!
on that note, with the line movement in the Detroit/Kansas City run total line I am thinking about putting one last wager on… finalizing whether i will pull the trigger
Man, Atlanta is to you what the Yankees are to me I guess. Tough break!!
On my site, Detroit/KC o/u is 8 1/2 with the over being -120. I'm thinking hard about the under myself. Duffy has been decent if not good. This could be a 4-2 type game.
Also, interesting analysis of the Boston game. Hitting 60% of your bets for/against Boston is pretty nice. I'm staying away personally, but good luck.
0
Man, Atlanta is to you what the Yankees are to me I guess. Tough break!!
On my site, Detroit/KC o/u is 8 1/2 with the over being -120. I'm thinking hard about the under myself. Duffy has been decent if not good. This could be a 4-2 type game.
Also, interesting analysis of the Boston game. Hitting 60% of your bets for/against Boston is pretty nice. I'm staying away personally, but good luck.
OK, i couldn't resist laying off this one… I was going to go with the KC TT Under (3.5), but the line was getting hit pretty hard with overs and the FG moved a full run (from 7.5 to 8.5) and the F5 moved a half run which was just enough to get me to bite
Detroit/Kansas City Under 4.5 F5 (-110) --- 1.00 Units / 1.00% of Bankroll
best of luck tonight everyone!
0
OK, i couldn't resist laying off this one… I was going to go with the KC TT Under (3.5), but the line was getting hit pretty hard with overs and the FG moved a full run (from 7.5 to 8.5) and the F5 moved a half run which was just enough to get me to bite
Detroit/Kansas City Under 4.5 F5 (-110) --- 1.00 Units / 1.00% of Bankroll
Good call. On second thought I think it is more prudent to do F5 under 4.5 (-110) than under 8.5 (even) for the full game. Thanks for pointing that out! With you on this bet.
0
Good call. On second thought I think it is more prudent to do F5 under 4.5 (-110) than under 8.5 (even) for the full game. Thanks for pointing that out! With you on this bet.
Man, Atlanta is to you what the Yankees are to me I guess. Tough break!!
On my site, Detroit/KC o/u is 8 1/2 with the over being -120. I'm thinking hard about the under myself. Duffy has been decent if not good. This could be a 4-2 type game.
Also, interesting analysis of the Boston game. Hitting 60% of your bets for/against Boston is pretty nice. I'm staying away personally, but good luck.
Duffy is VERY good and has given Detroit fits. His main problem is he runs a high pitch count and can't go more than 6 innings most of the time. He had held the Tigers to a BAA of .179 over 95 at bats.
Similar story for Sanchez, of course, as well… he has held KC to a BAA of .210 over 186 at bats. Billy Butler and Alex Gordon (DL) are the only two with any success off of him.
The extra half run F5 def was the deciding factor for me.
The FG under is compelling as well (at 8.5 or 9), but you never know what you are going to get with the Detroit bullpen or from the Detroit bats once Duffy is out of the game. On my betting account, you can buy half runs and the 9/U is -130 (25pts for the 1/2 run). Clearly, I opted to go F5.
0
Quote Originally Posted by lakerz:
Man, Atlanta is to you what the Yankees are to me I guess. Tough break!!
On my site, Detroit/KC o/u is 8 1/2 with the over being -120. I'm thinking hard about the under myself. Duffy has been decent if not good. This could be a 4-2 type game.
Also, interesting analysis of the Boston game. Hitting 60% of your bets for/against Boston is pretty nice. I'm staying away personally, but good luck.
Duffy is VERY good and has given Detroit fits. His main problem is he runs a high pitch count and can't go more than 6 innings most of the time. He had held the Tigers to a BAA of .179 over 95 at bats.
Similar story for Sanchez, of course, as well… he has held KC to a BAA of .210 over 186 at bats. Billy Butler and Alex Gordon (DL) are the only two with any success off of him.
The extra half run F5 def was the deciding factor for me.
The FG under is compelling as well (at 8.5 or 9), but you never know what you are going to get with the Detroit bullpen or from the Detroit bats once Duffy is out of the game. On my betting account, you can buy half runs and the 9/U is -130 (25pts for the 1/2 run). Clearly, I opted to go F5.
Turns out we didn't even need that extra 1/2 a run to win the F5 under Detroit/KC.
Angels in a tight one. Will have to sweat that one out looks like...
Well we cashed on a few plays so far (that you took)
I am definitely sweating the Angels game. Richards' pitch count is up there and I HATE the Angels' bullpen. They are not to be trusted. I expected the Angels to score at least 3 in the first 6 innings. Well, at least the Texas bullpen is just as bad.
DET/KC Under 4.5 F5
STL/MIL OVER 7.5 FG
Los Angeles Angels ***Pending***
Seattle Mariners *** Pending***
0
Quote Originally Posted by lakerz:
Turns out we didn't even need that extra 1/2 a run to win the F5 under Detroit/KC.
Angels in a tight one. Will have to sweat that one out looks like...
Well we cashed on a few plays so far (that you took)
I am definitely sweating the Angels game. Richards' pitch count is up there and I HATE the Angels' bullpen. They are not to be trusted. I expected the Angels to score at least 3 in the first 6 innings. Well, at least the Texas bullpen is just as bad.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Hot Forum Topics
