----------------------------------------------------------- Performance History ----------------------------------------------------------- Overall 2016: 122-84-12 (59%), +14.33% Return on Risk 2015: 298-267-32 (53%), +6.46% Return on Risk 2014: 826-685-112 (55%), +4.13% Return on Risk
Picks of the Day 2016: 35-24-4 (59%), +14.95% Return on Risk 2015: 108-87-12 (55%), +14.17% Return on Risk 2014: 121-72-16 (63%), +16.60% Return on Risk
The run continues (since 5/16): 54-23-3 (70%) Yesterday, I had this at 48-23-3 and didn't update when the Yankees/Orioles over hit. Hence, what appears to be the extra win.
Note for some of the newer followers sending me messages and posting in my thread lately. I come into each season with a goal of returning 5%+ on risk. Clearly, I have exceeded that by leaps and bounds so far this year. However, there will be certainly be bad days (like this past Thursday). For every few 4-1 days there is a 1-4 day sandwiched in between. Money management is key. Last thing I want is a whine fest when I have a bad day, and my thread littered with naive nonsense (see KeyElement's threads for recent examples). You should note that my wagers are 1% of bankroll (~$125 as of now), so even a 0-10 run wouldn't put me in a bad spot. If you can't afford to go 0-4, then scale back your bets. This is a marathon. Yesterday means nothing. Today is a new day.
Texas Rangers FG -110, Fiers/Lewis
Toronto Blue Jays FG +115, Happ/Fulmer
I did away with formal write-ups about mid-way through last season, but I am always game for banter. Good luck fellas!
----------------------------------------------------------- Performance History ----------------------------------------------------------- Overall 2016: 122-84-12 (59%), +14.33% Return on Risk 2015: 298-267-32 (53%), +6.46% Return on Risk 2014: 826-685-112 (55%), +4.13% Return on Risk
Picks of the Day 2016: 35-24-4 (59%), +14.95% Return on Risk 2015: 108-87-12 (55%), +14.17% Return on Risk 2014: 121-72-16 (63%), +16.60% Return on Risk
The run continues (since 5/16): 54-23-3 (70%) Yesterday, I had this at 48-23-3 and didn't update when the Yankees/Orioles over hit. Hence, what appears to be the extra win.
Note for some of the newer followers sending me messages and posting in my thread lately. I come into each season with a goal of returning 5%+ on risk. Clearly, I have exceeded that by leaps and bounds so far this year. However, there will be certainly be bad days (like this past Thursday). For every few 4-1 days there is a 1-4 day sandwiched in between. Money management is key. Last thing I want is a whine fest when I have a bad day, and my thread littered with naive nonsense (see KeyElement's threads for recent examples). You should note that my wagers are 1% of bankroll (~$125 as of now), so even a 0-10 run wouldn't put me in a bad spot. If you can't afford to go 0-4, then scale back your bets. This is a marathon. Yesterday means nothing. Today is a new day.
Texas Rangers FG -110, Fiers/Lewis
Toronto Blue Jays FG +115, Happ/Fulmer
I did away with formal write-ups about mid-way through last season, but I am always game for banter. Good luck fellas!
thats pretty good value on the rangers against fiers, who's not very good on the road. that jays/tigers game should be a dandy. two hot pitchers and both lineups seeing the ball well lately. happ is 1-3 in his last three starts vs detroit which is a concern. gl
0
thats pretty good value on the rangers against fiers, who's not very good on the road. that jays/tigers game should be a dandy. two hot pitchers and both lineups seeing the ball well lately. happ is 1-3 in his last three starts vs detroit which is a concern. gl
I rarely play the RL on home teams. I like the ML. Good luck.
I think you might be losing out on some money
The Cardinals have won 80% of their homegames by 2 runs+. That makes it much more appealing to turn a -140 into a +160 for example. Cubs have won 82% of their homegames by 2+ runs.
In this case, I might just do the ML with the rangers game. Rangers have won a lot of games by 1 run
0
Quote Originally Posted by BirdsOnBat:
I rarely play the RL on home teams. I like the ML. Good luck.
I think you might be losing out on some money
The Cardinals have won 80% of their homegames by 2 runs+. That makes it much more appealing to turn a -140 into a +160 for example. Cubs have won 82% of their homegames by 2+ runs.
In this case, I might just do the ML with the rangers game. Rangers have won a lot of games by 1 run
Don't listen to the detractors. This site is just a tool to share with other bettors who like to analyze sports. Anyone hoping for a one day payday should just buy a powerball ticket.
I like Texas, they've owned the Astros, swept them earlier this year on the road. I also like Toronto. I'm at +105 because I drug my feet.
Beyond those, I'm not "loving" much. My other thought is NYY at home with Tanaka, although the Angels are pretty hot lately. Curious what your pick of the day will be! Alot of ugly games out there in my mind!
GL, and thanks for sharing!
0
Don't listen to the detractors. This site is just a tool to share with other bettors who like to analyze sports. Anyone hoping for a one day payday should just buy a powerball ticket.
I like Texas, they've owned the Astros, swept them earlier this year on the road. I also like Toronto. I'm at +105 because I drug my feet.
Beyond those, I'm not "loving" much. My other thought is NYY at home with Tanaka, although the Angels are pretty hot lately. Curious what your pick of the day will be! Alot of ugly games out there in my mind!
KeyElement is condescending towards others. He thrives on failures of others just like his haters do him.
He provides genuine responses to sensible questions. The rest he rightly dismisses. Notice how he engages with other genuine cappers. Ask him an intelligent question and see how he responds.
Your comments about him enjoying others failures are pure speculation.
0
Quote Originally Posted by fadeORdie:
KeyElement is condescending towards others. He thrives on failures of others just like his haters do him.
He provides genuine responses to sensible questions. The rest he rightly dismisses. Notice how he engages with other genuine cappers. Ask him an intelligent question and see how he responds.
Your comments about him enjoying others failures are pure speculation.
Good Luck Bob. You're doing a great job. There's a lot of juveniles on here but just ignore the BS and keep doing your thing. A lot of us appreciate you.
0
Good Luck Bob. You're doing a great job. There's a lot of juveniles on here but just ignore the BS and keep doing your thing. A lot of us appreciate you.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.