Yes, I have an advanced Excel model (keep updating it as we go along to make it better and better -- hopefully ) that performs certain calculations to identify 'value' plays for me. I do use fangraphs for majority of the data in the model. Even after identifying those, I still breakdown every MLB game (even the ones my model doesn't recommend) just to see if I find some 'value' or an interesting angle that's worth exploiting. It's rare, but sometimes I go with a play that wasn't initially on my model's radar.
Cin/Phi U -- Cincinnati has had a lot of success against lefties this year. That being said, Hamels has been their cryptonie historically. I believe he's like 7-0 against them or something like that. Phillies have had success off Arroyo but their bats have been pretty cold lately. All in all, I see some value in this play actually. My model has this one at 6.7 runs.
Hou/LAD U - definitely some value here as well. I have this one at 6.2. Kershaw is in a rebound mode for sure and Norris has excellent advanced stats. Going up against a Dodgers team that is likely missing Ethier and Barajas today, is definitely a bouns. This one was on my strong leans list, but I can't remember why I decided to lay off this one. Hmmmm....
Yes, I have an advanced Excel model (keep updating it as we go along to make it better and better -- hopefully ) that performs certain calculations to identify 'value' plays for me. I do use fangraphs for majority of the data in the model. Even after identifying those, I still breakdown every MLB game (even the ones my model doesn't recommend) just to see if I find some 'value' or an interesting angle that's worth exploiting. It's rare, but sometimes I go with a play that wasn't initially on my model's radar.
Cin/Phi U -- Cincinnati has had a lot of success against lefties this year. That being said, Hamels has been their cryptonie historically. I believe he's like 7-0 against them or something like that. Phillies have had success off Arroyo but their bats have been pretty cold lately. All in all, I see some value in this play actually. My model has this one at 6.7 runs.
Hou/LAD U - definitely some value here as well. I have this one at 6.2. Kershaw is in a rebound mode for sure and Norris has excellent advanced stats. Going up against a Dodgers team that is likely missing Ethier and Barajas today, is definitely a bouns. This one was on my strong leans list, but I can't remember why I decided to lay off this one. Hmmmm....
Yes, I have an advanced Excel model (keep updating it as we go along to make it better and better -- hopefully ) that performs certain calculations to identify 'value' plays for me. I do use fangraphs for majority of the data in the model. Even after identifying those, I still breakdown every MLB game (even the ones my model doesn't recommend) just to see if I find some 'value' or an interesting angle that's worth exploiting. It's rare, but sometimes I go with a play that wasn't initially on my model's radar.
Cin/Phi U -- Cincinnati has had a lot of success against lefties this year. That being said, Hamels has been their cryptonie historically. I believe he's like 7-0 against them or something like that. Phillies have had success off Arroyo but their bats have been pretty cold lately. All in all, I see some value in this play actually. My model has this one at 6.7 runs.
Hou/LAD U - definitely some value here as well. I have this one at 6.2. Kershaw is in a rebound mode for sure and Norris has excellent advanced stats. Going up against a Dodgers team that is likely missing Ethier and Barajas today, is definitely a bouns. This one was on my strong leans list, but I can't remember why I decided to lay off this one. Hmmmm....
I remember why I passed on that LAD/HOU total...the wind is supposed to be blowing out at 11-14 mph..
Yes, I have an advanced Excel model (keep updating it as we go along to make it better and better -- hopefully ) that performs certain calculations to identify 'value' plays for me. I do use fangraphs for majority of the data in the model. Even after identifying those, I still breakdown every MLB game (even the ones my model doesn't recommend) just to see if I find some 'value' or an interesting angle that's worth exploiting. It's rare, but sometimes I go with a play that wasn't initially on my model's radar.
Cin/Phi U -- Cincinnati has had a lot of success against lefties this year. That being said, Hamels has been their cryptonie historically. I believe he's like 7-0 against them or something like that. Phillies have had success off Arroyo but their bats have been pretty cold lately. All in all, I see some value in this play actually. My model has this one at 6.7 runs.
Hou/LAD U - definitely some value here as well. I have this one at 6.2. Kershaw is in a rebound mode for sure and Norris has excellent advanced stats. Going up against a Dodgers team that is likely missing Ethier and Barajas today, is definitely a bouns. This one was on my strong leans list, but I can't remember why I decided to lay off this one. Hmmmm....
I remember why I passed on that LAD/HOU total...the wind is supposed to be blowing out at 11-14 mph..
whats ur call on tb and det over? the bull pen for both teams is just horrible!
also, whats ur call for sea ml?
I have that one at 8.1 so that total is right on. Sure the BP's are pretty bad but neither offense has been lighting things up. Coke has been impressive his last 2 starts, especially the one against the hot Red Sox team. Hellickson is coming off an 80+ pitch performance so he should be rested for this one. Just not enough factors for me to take the OVER.
Sea ML -- definitely was on my 'leans' list. Pavano has pitched much better the last 2 outings while Vargas is coming off a 115 pitch performance. He tends to struggle when going over 110 pitches in a game before. Was an easy PASS
whats ur call on tb and det over? the bull pen for both teams is just horrible!
also, whats ur call for sea ml?
I have that one at 8.1 so that total is right on. Sure the BP's are pretty bad but neither offense has been lighting things up. Coke has been impressive his last 2 starts, especially the one against the hot Red Sox team. Hellickson is coming off an 80+ pitch performance so he should be rested for this one. Just not enough factors for me to take the OVER.
Sea ML -- definitely was on my 'leans' list. Pavano has pitched much better the last 2 outings while Vargas is coming off a 115 pitch performance. He tends to struggle when going over 110 pitches in a game before. Was an easy PASS
Excellent points and very true. I didn't fade Buchholz every game in his last 4 just waiting for regression, because like you said, it could come at any time. Those situations just weren't right to do so and glad I didn't as Red Sox won all 4 of his last 4 starts. But today, coming off a 127 pitch outing, and facing a potent lineup that is averaging 5.5 rpg at home, I feel the situation is right to 'fade' him.
Excellent points and very true. I didn't fade Buchholz every game in his last 4 just waiting for regression, because like you said, it could come at any time. Those situations just weren't right to do so and glad I didn't as Red Sox won all 4 of his last 4 starts. But today, coming off a 127 pitch outing, and facing a potent lineup that is averaging 5.5 rpg at home, I feel the situation is right to 'fade' him.
Not sure about the total. I have the posted # as right-on.
Not sure about the total. I have the posted # as right-on.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.