All Forums | MLB Betting

Bodio's MLB Wed 09/21

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 21196
Posts: 97
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2011
Posts: 176
Posted: #76
Tampa just killed me.  What's your opinion on game 2?
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 6283
Posted: #77
Some interesting situations in the night games..Like that Tigers under with Sherzer pitching.
The impossible only takes longer….
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 54
Posted: #78
Great call with Cubbies
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2011
Posts: 757
Posted: #79
Rays blew it !
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2011
Posts: 1011
Posted: #80
Tampa killed me too- (but I'm on the Cubs and Dbacks.)

Should just lay off game 2 NY/TB..?-  Yanks clinched- 
Maybe they rest some players? TB gets fired up? CC on the mound.
IMO- too many variables to make a good pick

DET, SEA or SF look tempting...?

GL
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2008
Posts: 15506
Posted: #81
I got burned late with TB as well but I'm going back to them in G2. I had them penciled in anyways and after the YANKS won AND clinched a playoff berth I'm taking a shot at the RAYS & +170. Hopefully BOD is on board as well but he has just a pinch more patience than me lol BOL either way boys
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2009
Posts: 7370
Posted: #82
Quote Originally Posted by DDH420:

Hey bro missed ya for a few days I hope all is well and glad to have you back.

I noticed you don't even have a lean on the ATL/FLA game but I was loving the FISH today at -120. Here is what I came up with. Please let me know what you think.....be kind

Re-post: I forgot to mention them earlier but I also love the FISH today at home to a super slumping Derek B-Lowe and the Bravos. Neither team is playing particularly great ball but since getting some bats back in the lineup FLA has played better winning 3 of 5 (ATL 2 W's L5)

 FLA is also 3-0 in Javier Vazquez's L3 outings. I had sworn off of him earlier in the year cuz he was so damn inconsistent but lately he's been as good as they get. In his last start he had a complete game 5 hit shutout. The game before a 6 inning 3 hits shutout. Before that a 7 inning 6 hit 1 run outing and before that he went 7 innings allowing 3 hits and 3 runs but none were earned. Going back even further all the way through his L10 the 6 previous outings were also ALL quality starts (Actually all of his L10 starts are quality outings) going 7 innings in 4 games and 6 innings in the other 2. He gave up 3 runs 3 times and 1 run the other 3 times.

Derek Lowe has basically been the complete opposite at least recently. In his L3 he has only lasted 13.1 innings,allowed 26 hits,has a whip that looks more like and era at 2.48 and his era looks Wes Welkers average yards per catch at 10.12. Oh and yeah you probably already guessed he's 0-3. For comparison Vazquez's L3 he is 3-0 with 22 IP,only 14 hits,a whip of .73 and a ridiculous era of .41.

Lowe is also coming off his shortest start in two years and trying to avoid a career high 4th straight loss. Javy is looking to win his 5th straight. My only real concern is that Lowe is 1-0 with a 1.42 ERA in two starts against Florida this season, with both coming in Miami but with his current form so bad thats not enough to scare me off this one. THOUGHTS ???

Thanx

Yeah I wanted to back Vazquez but at these odds there is no 'value'.  The books have adjusted their prices on him.  Good luck
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2009
Posts: 7370
Posted: #83
Quote Originally Posted by raywapuzzo:

Tampa just killed me in first game..   what about game 2?

I liked the Yankees in game 2 but I'm just going to pass
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2009
Posts: 7370
Posted: #84
Quote Originally Posted by MojoGypson:

Tampa killed me too- (but I'm on the Cubs and Dbacks.)

Should just lay off game 2 NY/TB..?-  Yanks clinched- 
Maybe they rest some players? TB gets fired up? CC on the mound.
IMO- too many variables to make a good pick

DET, SEA or SF look tempting...?

GL

I was looking at DET/KC UNDER but that dropped to 8.5...so no play
Besides that was liking Yankees had they lost game 1.  Now it's a pass also
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2009
Posts: 497
Posted: #85
you think the yankees are satisfied because they clinched a playoff spot?  This is the yankees not the diamondbacks!  They want home field advantage, CC wants 20 wins and guys got rested in the first game granted they came in later but I dont see them giving any games away until home field is clinched
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2009
Posts: 7370
Posted: #86
Passing on the rest of the night!  
1-2 today for -1.73 units 
Back at it tomorrow fellas. 

Going forward, I don't see myself playing anymore OVERS.  Teams are bringing up young players and even playoff squads will be resting starters.  Will only look at UNDERS the rest of the way. 
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2009
Posts: 7370
Posted: #87
Quote Originally Posted by evc3210:

you think the yankees are satisfied because they clinched a playoff spot?  This is the yankees not the diamondbacks!  They want home field advantage, CC wants 20 wins and guys got rested in the first game granted they came in later but I dont see them giving any games away until home field is clinched

Agree 100%.  
Was hoping for a TB win in game 1 and was going to back the Bombers in game 2.  
Good luck if you play this one.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2011
Posts: 309
Posted: #88
hey bodio you think over 7 in the texas oakland game is a good play i could see ranger putting up 5 to 6 runs.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2009
Posts: 7370
Posted: #89
Quote Originally Posted by RhodeIslandG:

hey bodio you think over 7 in the texas oakland game is a good play i could see ranger putting up 5 to 6 runs.

I have this one at 6.7 total runs
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2011
Posts: 1839
Posted: #90
Hey bodio, what made the STL/NYM UNDER not a play for you?
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 4326
Posted: #91
Bo, looking at Phils/Nats U8

Phils bats are ice-cold and Howard, Pence, and Chooch are out.  The Vanimal has been solid all year.  Especially at home and at night.  Werth is out for the Nats and Phils are known to have some difficulties with Lefties.  Finally, Tim Timmons has been 22-36 O/U the last 2 years.  Ohh, and it's cold and rainy here in Philly.  Thoughts? 


 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2008
Posts: 15506
Posted: #92
Quote Originally Posted by Swoop:

Bo, looking at Phils/Nats U8

Phils bats are ice-cold and Howard, Pence, and Chooch are out.  The Vanimal has been solid all year.  Especially at home and at night.  Werth is out for the Nats and Phils are known to have some difficulties with Lefties.  Finally, Tim Timmons has been 22-36 O/U the last 2 years.  Ohh, and it's cold and rainy here in Philly.  Thoughts? 


Hey SWOOP (great pic BTW) I know you're asking BOS but I read this earlier and it turned me off the WASH ML who I was  thinking of playing as nice +175 dogs

"The Phillies could be in line for a breakout performance with Lannan (9-13, 3.68 ERA) in town. The left-hander is 1-12 with a 5.81 ERA over 16 starts against the Phillies, going 0-5 with a 7.40 ERA in six outings at Citizens Bank Park. Lannan doesn't enter this matchup with much momentum after compiling a 7.56 ERA over his last two starts. He is 1-6 with a 4.15 ERA in his last seven outings. Lannan won't have to worry about pitching to Ryan Howard (bursitis), who isn't expected to return to the lineup until Thursday at the earliest. He will, though, likely be facing Raul Ibanez and Chase Utley, who are 12 for 25 (.480) and 12 for 32 (.375), respectively, against him -- each going deep twice

Philadelphia gives the ball to Vance Worley (11-2, 2.85), who could be taking his final turn in the rotation. The Phillies are likely to move the 23-year-old right-hander to the bullpen following this start in order to give him some time to adjust to his new role come October. The decision to make Worley a reliever surely isn't based on performance as he continues to have a stellar season. He leads all rookies with at least 100 innings in ERA and ranks fourth in wins."

Either way BOL just thought I'd share
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2011
Posts: 727
Posted: #93
Bodio , you think Yankees + Texas is a good parlay for tonight ?
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2011
Posts: 1239
Posted: #94

Quote Originally Posted by evc3210:

you think the yankees are satisfied because they clinched a playoff spot?  This is the yankees not the diamondbacks!  They want home field advantage, CC wants 20 wins and guys got rested in the first game granted they came in later but I dont see them giving any games away until home field is clinched

nyy used their bp in game 1. also, very hard to sweep doubleheader.

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2009
Posts: 468
Posted: #95
going with SEA -1, ATL U8, STL -1. gl.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 446
Posted: #96
bodio  i like the under met game just curios why it was not a play thanks and gl
 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2010
Posts: 96
Posted: #97
Bodio - thanx alot for all your write-ups and pics.  i don't post often, but i read your thread when i can and it's always good info.  thx again
All Forums | MLB Betting
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.