for the total of the night on the chc and lad under how do you folks come to that result? is it on the spreadsheet?
That total is from "a capper who sends out emails claiming to always be 12-4 and hitting 80%" on his paid plays but I find that hard to believe, but however the free play from his website is where I get the total from. The free play is hitting very well, as long as it is a baseball total. When football starts I'm afraid we won't see as many MLB totals. I don't like to give out websites not affiliated with covers but I can give you a hint. His name is Joe and some consider him a Wiz.
The total of the day won again yesterday with Dod/Cubs under 6.5, that is now 4 in a row (I upped my wager to 2 units) and since I started tracking it 61-26, 28-8 (and 18-7 as posted here). Not too shabby! I parlayed it yesterday with Yankees under.
Today's total on the website is Oak/Tor under 8, but I see it opened at 7.5 and has dropped to 7, so the official total of the day is Oak/Tor under 7 (which is also a McShady Oakland home under play on his spreadsheet.)
I had another winning day up 6 units but would have been much better if the fricking Braves hadn't stunk and ruined my ATL-1.5 straight bet and killed a 3-teamer with STL-1.5 and Dod-1.5. Luckily I bet them all as straight plays also. How on earth does a winning team lose at home to the Astros? THAT'S HOW BASEBALL GO! (Ranger fans will recognize that as a famous Ron Washington quote).
I may do a jump-in home "non-dog" one game chase with Boston to avoid home sweep but the juice is high and they are not a winning team. I might try the RL-1.5. I'll update later.
Nice wins Semper with Balt and Seattle. Pulling hard for Pitt with the red-hot Burnett today. Let's get that one!
McShady, I missed your series plays but I saw you split. I see you have Angels F5 under. Are you going to play game 3 of the Giants F5 under?
I may make a 3-teamer out of the Oakland under plus the 2 total trends yet to hit with Phillies over and Angels under.
0
Quote Originally Posted by hi2ak:
for the total of the night on the chc and lad under how do you folks come to that result? is it on the spreadsheet?
That total is from "a capper who sends out emails claiming to always be 12-4 and hitting 80%" on his paid plays but I find that hard to believe, but however the free play from his website is where I get the total from. The free play is hitting very well, as long as it is a baseball total. When football starts I'm afraid we won't see as many MLB totals. I don't like to give out websites not affiliated with covers but I can give you a hint. His name is Joe and some consider him a Wiz.
The total of the day won again yesterday with Dod/Cubs under 6.5, that is now 4 in a row (I upped my wager to 2 units) and since I started tracking it 61-26, 28-8 (and 18-7 as posted here). Not too shabby! I parlayed it yesterday with Yankees under.
Today's total on the website is Oak/Tor under 8, but I see it opened at 7.5 and has dropped to 7, so the official total of the day is Oak/Tor under 7 (which is also a McShady Oakland home under play on his spreadsheet.)
I had another winning day up 6 units but would have been much better if the fricking Braves hadn't stunk and ruined my ATL-1.5 straight bet and killed a 3-teamer with STL-1.5 and Dod-1.5. Luckily I bet them all as straight plays also. How on earth does a winning team lose at home to the Astros? THAT'S HOW BASEBALL GO! (Ranger fans will recognize that as a famous Ron Washington quote).
I may do a jump-in home "non-dog" one game chase with Boston to avoid home sweep but the juice is high and they are not a winning team. I might try the RL-1.5. I'll update later.
Nice wins Semper with Balt and Seattle. Pulling hard for Pitt with the red-hot Burnett today. Let's get that one!
McShady, I missed your series plays but I saw you split. I see you have Angels F5 under. Are you going to play game 3 of the Giants F5 under?
I may make a 3-teamer out of the Oakland under plus the 2 total trends yet to hit with Phillies over and Angels under.
Those trends are for informational purposes. They are not "official plays". However, I am playing them both today. It worked last Sunday when there were two left on the sheet.
Look under the "Series" tab to see McShady's official chase plays. Today's play is Angels under First 5 innings.
Also under the "Home Unders 2H" tab. He is currently chasing Oak, SF and Pitt under when they are at home. Today that would be Oakland under.
Look under the "Phils/Yanks 2H" tab. He is finished going against the Phillies when favored but he always chases a prop bet on "Will there be a score in the 1st inning" YES on every Yankees game.
0
Those trends are for informational purposes. They are not "official plays". However, I am playing them both today. It worked last Sunday when there were two left on the sheet.
Look under the "Series" tab to see McShady's official chase plays. Today's play is Angels under First 5 innings.
Also under the "Home Unders 2H" tab. He is currently chasing Oak, SF and Pitt under when they are at home. Today that would be Oakland under.
Look under the "Phils/Yanks 2H" tab. He is finished going against the Phillies when favored but he always chases a prop bet on "Will there be a score in the 1st inning" YES on every Yankees game.
McShady's official series plays and home under plays are the plays that are listed with the dollars won and lost. The trends are there for people like us to take advantage of. Don't try to make it too complicated.
He may have a series play that goes AGAINST a trend!
Today he likes the First 5 under on the Angels. The trend is out there and apparently he likes the F5 better! He's got a reason and his track record is awesome. The trends are great but some of them have lost before. Keep that in mind.
0
You could bet them both, I am.
McShady's official series plays and home under plays are the plays that are listed with the dollars won and lost. The trends are there for people like us to take advantage of. Don't try to make it too complicated.
He may have a series play that goes AGAINST a trend!
Today he likes the First 5 under on the Angels. The trend is out there and apparently he likes the F5 better! He's got a reason and his track record is awesome. The trends are great but some of them have lost before. Keep that in mind.
Hoyasaxa, to answer what I believe is confusing you is the Y next to the trend under the column that say IN PLAY.
That doesn't mean McShady is PLAYING it, what it means is that today the trend hasn't yet been hit in any game of the series and therefore the trend is still "IN PLAY" or waiting to hit. The other series trends have already been won for at least one game and they are not in play.
Today, the Phillies have not yet gone over in any game of their current series and the Angels have not yet gone under in any game of their current series.
I hope this helps.
0
Hoyasaxa, to answer what I believe is confusing you is the Y next to the trend under the column that say IN PLAY.
That doesn't mean McShady is PLAYING it, what it means is that today the trend hasn't yet been hit in any game of the series and therefore the trend is still "IN PLAY" or waiting to hit. The other series trends have already been won for at least one game and they are not in play.
Today, the Phillies have not yet gone over in any game of their current series and the Angels have not yet gone under in any game of their current series.
Thanks for clarifying this Angle....I been impressed but confused since I took the Mets and Phil's avoiding NL West sweeps like 30-1 trend a few weeks ago...and of course they split...
0
Thanks for clarifying this Angle....I been impressed but confused since I took the Mets and Phil's avoiding NL West sweeps like 30-1 trend a few weeks ago...and of course they split...
Thanks for clarifying this Angle....I been impressed but confused since I took the Mets and Phil's avoiding NL West sweeps like 30-1 trend a few weeks ago...and of course they split...
I know what you mean. You never know when a trend will take a loss, but overall I always play them if they are still "in play" on the LAST game of a series. I sometimes make a parlay with them! I did that today and right now the Phillies are over 7.5 and the Angels game is tied 2-1 in bottom 7th. I hope it holds up. Of course McShady won on the Yankees prop (my book had it today) and the F5 under on the Angels!(2 units for me as McShady bet more than usual!
I forgot to mention earlier as I was busy before the Boston game started that I did jump-in but only went 4 units as juice was around -195. I usually bet more on my one game jump-ins but the Red Sox have sucked. I started to bet the RL-1.5 but did not. I hope it wins as it was my highest amount played today.
I believe the only team not yet swept is the Reds. Be aware of that if they are avoiding sweep on last game of series.
I can remember when there were 3 unswept teams, Texas/WhiSox/Reds. McShady had Texas vs Whi Sox first 2 games and changed to Whi Sox on game 3 because he believed after the first 2 games that Texas would get swept. I bit my lip and changed with him to WhiSox and they swept Texas!
From your avatar there, I gather you may be a Dallas Cowboys fan. I am local to Dallas area. I have been cleaning up fading the Cowboys for the last several years. They had a long streak of not winning any games by more than 4 points and my friends who were fans were simply amazed whenever I bet against them if the line was Dallas -4 or higher. They really love their Cowboys here and many are not that informed on point spreads.
Now getting to what I really wanted to say when I saw your avatar. My book has the Cowboys regular season win total at under 9-130. I have heard about 9.5 in some places. If you can get action on 9 go with the under. The Cowboys are over-valued almost every year. I look for another 7-9 or at best 9-7 which would push on 9. Don't fall for Jerry Jones hype!
0
Quote Originally Posted by Hoyasaxa:
Thanks for clarifying this Angle....I been impressed but confused since I took the Mets and Phil's avoiding NL West sweeps like 30-1 trend a few weeks ago...and of course they split...
I know what you mean. You never know when a trend will take a loss, but overall I always play them if they are still "in play" on the LAST game of a series. I sometimes make a parlay with them! I did that today and right now the Phillies are over 7.5 and the Angels game is tied 2-1 in bottom 7th. I hope it holds up. Of course McShady won on the Yankees prop (my book had it today) and the F5 under on the Angels!(2 units for me as McShady bet more than usual!
I forgot to mention earlier as I was busy before the Boston game started that I did jump-in but only went 4 units as juice was around -195. I usually bet more on my one game jump-ins but the Red Sox have sucked. I started to bet the RL-1.5 but did not. I hope it wins as it was my highest amount played today.
I believe the only team not yet swept is the Reds. Be aware of that if they are avoiding sweep on last game of series.
I can remember when there were 3 unswept teams, Texas/WhiSox/Reds. McShady had Texas vs Whi Sox first 2 games and changed to Whi Sox on game 3 because he believed after the first 2 games that Texas would get swept. I bit my lip and changed with him to WhiSox and they swept Texas!
From your avatar there, I gather you may be a Dallas Cowboys fan. I am local to Dallas area. I have been cleaning up fading the Cowboys for the last several years. They had a long streak of not winning any games by more than 4 points and my friends who were fans were simply amazed whenever I bet against them if the line was Dallas -4 or higher. They really love their Cowboys here and many are not that informed on point spreads.
Now getting to what I really wanted to say when I saw your avatar. My book has the Cowboys regular season win total at under 9-130. I have heard about 9.5 in some places. If you can get action on 9 go with the under. The Cowboys are over-valued almost every year. I look for another 7-9 or at best 9-7 which would push on 9. Don't fall for Jerry Jones hype!
no! iam sneakin out to golf good luck today buddy! taken the juice on shady. bol all!
You may be on to somethere there, McShady could be at the Phillies game, but it's not like him to not be here on Sunday for the Yankees 1st inning so can post this for his "YES score in the 1st inning prop"!
0
Quote Originally Posted by 72DAVE:
no! iam sneakin out to golf good luck today buddy! taken the juice on shady. bol all!
You may be on to somethere there, McShady could be at the Phillies game, but it's not like him to not be here on Sunday for the Yankees 1st inning so can post this for his "YES score in the 1st inning prop"!
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.