All Forums | MLB Betting

CONGRATULATIONS TO THE HOUSTON ASTROS! 2017 WORLD SERIES WINNER!

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 17593
Posts: 121
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2003
Posts: 34728
Posted: #26
According to my algorithm/mojo ratings -- the Houston Astros WILL NOT get swept by the Dodgers. The Dodgers will not win the series 4-0. If the Dodgers win, it will be in 6 games or even the final showdown in Pasadena. 

The landscape of things to come and how i plan to NOT LOSE money in the series -- here are the mojo ratings:


 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2003
Posts: 34728
Posted: #27
Damn the 7800 characters limit! Will have to break it down into Home-Away clusters.

Oct 24Oct 25
@ LAD@ LAD
B+B+
B+B+
A/B+A/B+
C-C-
BB+
B+B++
C-C-
B+B
A+B+
A+A
B+B+
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2013
Posts: 1395
Posted: #28
congratulating the stros but only betting $200 LOL. and they don't play in pasadena bud. they play in elysian park. 
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2003
Posts: 34728
Posted: #29
Forget it. The stupid 7800 character limit is so annoying, i can't do the copy and paste job as i wanted.

Here are the links to the team mojo ratings:

Astros
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/13H_unN7YC96AFeKap1rICIPVU3VkB_pu2hc-izhDSZk/edit#gid=0

Dodgers:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1LsoY0aatHXPFHRjKJARK5quHyhYImGG-y2G1uWuJreo/edit#gid=0
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2003
Posts: 34728
Posted: #30
Quote Originally Posted by Holdat2:

congratulating the stros but only betting $200 LOL. and they don't play in pasadena bud. they play in elysian park. 

Dude. I live in LA. Chill out. I know exactly where they play.
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2003
Posts: 34728
Posted: #31
So, according to the ratings i think this could be a series where the home teams win their respective games. 

I plan to bet on the Astros at home to make my money back if Houston goes back to Minute Maid Park down 0-2.

The Dodgers team mojo is really bad for the last 4 or 5 games. This is the reason why i give the edge to the Astros as far as winning the whole thing.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2005
Posts: 233
Posted: #32

I had the ASTROS for AlCS from game one of playoffs. I also have em +375 for WS. Question is...if you were me do you guarantee money and play Dodgers for half of wager or do I ride it out like a real gambler...lol. As you can see, I have been around a while, but never, ever post. I have followed you for years though. What do you think? Are you absolutley sold on Astros? I was and am but after watching Dodgers, they have me second guessing. I am not the type to shout out my bet amounts, but lets hust say it is substantial. If it wasn't I would let it ride. 

 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2003
Posts: 34728
Posted: #33
Besides the Super Bowl and the college football Championship game, i treat the World Series  games just like any other game. No need to blow my wad here. 

Losing $200-$500 at this point is nothing when i am up 63.24 units (+$5,584.47) on the season. And i am hitting over 65% in the post-season.

 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2003
Posts: 34728
Posted: #34
Quote Originally Posted by muchogusto:

I had the ASTROS for AlCS from game one of playoffs. I also have em +375 for WS. Question is...if you were me do you guarantee money and play Dodgers for half of wager or do I ride it out like a real gambler...lol. As you can see, I have been around a while, but never, ever post. I have followed you for years though. What do you think? Are you absolutley sold on Astros? I was and am but after watching Dodgers, they have me second guessing. I am not the type to shout out my bet amounts, but lets hust say it is substantial. If it wasn't I would let it ride. 


It is relative how much you have made for the season. If you were willing to gamble a substantial amount -- let it ride.

I give the Astros a 56% chance to win the World Series. Definitely worth the tasty odds you got from early October.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2017
Posts: 3686
Posted: #35
Quote Originally Posted by HappyKane:

Besides the Super Bowl and the college football Championship game, i treat the World Series  games just like any other game. No need to blow my wad here. 

Losing $200-$500 at this point is nothing when i am up 63.24 units (+$5,584.47) on the season. And i am hitting over 65% in the post-season.


You're only up 5.5k on the season and you think losing 10% of your bank roll is nothing 
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2009
Posts: 12908
Posted: #36

Interesting reasoning. Might have to consider the series play now. 

Might wait and and see how G1 goes, then play the series if they are behind 0-1. peace_5

 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2003
Posts: 34728
Posted: #37
Quote Originally Posted by fadeaway123:


You're only up 5.5k on the season and you think losing 10% of your bank roll is nothing 

Your statement is incorrect, the 10% of bankroll part. I think you meant 10% of what i have won.
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2003
Posts: 34728
Posted: #38
Houston Astros team mojo for Game 1:

George SpringerB+
Alex BregmanB+
Jose AltuveA/B+
Carlos CorreaC-
Yulieski Gurriel B
Brian McCannB+
Marwin GonzálezB+
Josh ReddickA+
pinch hitters, runners
Carlos BeltranA+
Cameron MaybinB+
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2003
Posts: 34728
Posted: #39
LA Dodgers line-up & team mojo for Game 1:

AChris Taylor
B-Justin Turner
C-Cody Bellinger
C-/D-Yasiel Puig
C-Enrique Hernandez
B+Corey Seager
C-Logan Forsythe
C-Austin Barnes
pinch hitters, runners
C+Chase Utley
C-Yasmani Grandal
B+Curtis Granderson
B+Joc Pederson
B+Andre Ethier
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2003
Posts: 34728
Posted: #40
Weather:

102 degrees w/ very low humidity, 6 mph wind out to right field

hot = fly balls will sail

cool + marine layer = fly balls do not sail
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2003
Posts: 34728
Posted: #41
Kershaw at home = 2.02 groundballs for every flyball

Kershaw on the road = 4.12 groundballs for every flyball

Keuchel on the road = 5.75 groundballs for every flyball

Keuchel at home = 8.4 groundballs for every flyball
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2015
Posts: 12504
Posted: #42
FADEAWAY: what's your record bud and how much are you up/down for the season? That is....in all combined sports chief? Very curious to hear this.....Thanks. 
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2015
Posts: 12504
Posted: #43
HappyKane: as a teacher, we live by our rubrics. So when grades are given out, in order for the grade to be of worth, it needs a rubric to support it. How do you go about giving the grades I see above? I like your style but I'm just curious to see how you get those grades amigo. Thanks bud.  
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2003
Posts: 34728
Posted: #44
Optimal Blue A+ mojo for Reddick today. Lets go and find a prop bet for him.

 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2003
Posts: 34728
Posted: #45
Quote Originally Posted by Achilles1629:

HappyKane: as a teacher, we live by our rubrics. So when grades are given out, in order for the grade to be of worth, it needs a rubric to support it. How do you go about giving the grades I see above? I like your style but I'm just curious to see how you get those grades amigo. Thanks bud.  

It is not what you think.

Ratings are derived from biorhythms + ephemeris. Very esoteric stuff; not an exact science but has been very useful and it is an intellectual property i do not care to delve into at the moment. But i have been doing this since 2006 (in which season i predicted a Red Sox sweep of the Rockies in the 2007 World Series). Only those that have followed my system for a long time understand how i use the algorithm to get my results/betting patterns. 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2011
Posts: 3171
Posted: #46
Quote Originally Posted by Achilles1629:

HappyKane: as a teacher, we live by our rubrics. So when grades are given out, in order for the grade to be of worth, it needs a rubric to support it. How do you go about giving the grades I see above? I like your style but I'm just curious to see how you get those grades amigo. Thanks bud.  
google: ephemeris he's answered it for me before
not a savior
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2015
Posts: 12504
Posted: #47
Thanks gents.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2007
Posts: 2919
Posted: #48
For some reason, I keep drawing similarities to the 1990 World Series.

It was another west coast team that appeared unbeatable, the Oakland A's. They had won the WS the year before and had won over 100 games in 1990. They had a great bullpen and the nuts for a closer in Eckersley. They had an all star line-up: McGwire, Harold Baines, Dave Herderson, Jose Canseco; and speed too with Ricky Henderson leading off. If I remember right, the series price was something like -280/+240, and with good reason because the A's did seem unbeatable.

But the problem was, their opponent was a pretty good team too, the Redlegs, and they didn't go for all that hype. They had a lot of role players, and a great middle infield in Larkin and Duncan, and a guy in center who could catch anything. And they played great team ball.

So, long story short, those unbeatable A's got swept.


 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2016
Posts: 1199
Posted: #49
this is the world series man. Throw all your sabermatrics i the garbage. whoever gets to the starter first wins if the playing field is similar in strength which even the Astros manager tell you they are, and even said  they can go head to head wihtout an issue.. all these + and -s are nonsense this time of the year chief. Your from LA right your team to Vicotry instead of backin these Texans.

going to World Series game tomorrow myself. Proud Angelian Wessss Sideeeee. $2000 on Kershaw.. and sleep well tonight
 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2013
Posts: 2475
Posted: #50
[Quote: Originally Posted by RebelTell2] For some reason, I keep drawing similarities to the 1990 World Series.

It was another west coast team that appeared unbeatable, the Oakland A's. They had won the WS the year before and had won over 100 games in 1990. They had a great bullpen and the nuts for a closer in Eckersley. They had an all star line-up: McGwire, Harold Baines, Dave Herderson, Jose Canseco; and speed too with Ricky Henderson leading off. If I remember right, the series price was something like -280/+240, and with good reason because the A's did seem unbeatable.

But the problem was, their opponent was a pretty good team too, the Redlegs, and they didn't go for all that hype. They had a lot of role players, and a great middle infield in Larkin and Duncan, and a guy in center who could catch anything. And they played great team ball.

So, long story short, those unbeatable A's got swept.

I sure hope history repeats this!!!  ^^^^^^  GO STROS BABY!!!!!!
All Forums | MLB Betting
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.