@Rip100
I'm a big believer in the luck factor evening out.
Some good, some bad.
Falcon Sports
Falcon Sports Power Totals Model
48-34 (+10.15 units)
58.54% Winners
To win one unit on each
Wednesday April 26
Toronto Over 9.5 (-110) MLB
To win one unit
There will be an evening card released this afternoon.
Check back if interested
Falcon Sports
Falcon Sports Power Totals Model
48-34 (+10.15 units)
58.54% Winners
To win one unit on each
Wednesday April 26
Toronto Over 9.5 (-110) MLB
To win one unit
There will be an evening card released this afternoon.
Check back if interested
Falcon Sports
The Falcon is releasing one night play right now.
So this gives us two plays for Wednesday thus far.
Toronto Over 9.5 (-110) MLB
Colorado Over 5.5 (-120) NHL
To win one unit on each
The remainder of the evening card will be released this afternoon.
Check back if interested
Falcon Sports
The Falcon is releasing one night play right now.
So this gives us two plays for Wednesday thus far.
Toronto Over 9.5 (-110) MLB
Colorado Over 5.5 (-120) NHL
To win one unit on each
The remainder of the evening card will be released this afternoon.
Check back if interested
Falcon Sports
Thanks guys
I've got about 10 guys in this industry that I'm very close too. This is what I tell them that I'm trying to accomplish. It's very simple how I want this thread to play out.
I want to prove, mostly to myself, that I've built a purely MATHEMATICAL betting model for sports totals, sports vary on specifics . That can meet these projections on a long-term monthly average.
This is simple and if u follow this, here is what I expect year round. This will be a go in football as well as all sports.
Monthly Projected AVERAGES for the Power Totals Model.
105 plays
57.14% Winners
(-110) avg betting line
(+10.00 units) of profit
2.5% of bankroll on each
Good luck if you follow, bad luck if u FADE (ha ha)
Back this afternoon.
Falcon Sports
Thanks guys
I've got about 10 guys in this industry that I'm very close too. This is what I tell them that I'm trying to accomplish. It's very simple how I want this thread to play out.
I want to prove, mostly to myself, that I've built a purely MATHEMATICAL betting model for sports totals, sports vary on specifics . That can meet these projections on a long-term monthly average.
This is simple and if u follow this, here is what I expect year round. This will be a go in football as well as all sports.
Monthly Projected AVERAGES for the Power Totals Model.
105 plays
57.14% Winners
(-110) avg betting line
(+10.00 units) of profit
2.5% of bankroll on each
Good luck if you follow, bad luck if u FADE (ha ha)
Back this afternoon.
Falcon Sports
What a crappy performance by the White Sox.
Current update
Falcon Sports Power Totals
48-35 (+9.05 units)
57.83% Winners
To win one unit on each
Wednesday night
Angels Under 9.5 (-110)
Atlanta Under 8 (-110)
Colorado Over 5.5 (-120) NHL
To win one unit on each
Falcon Sports
What a crappy performance by the White Sox.
Current update
Falcon Sports Power Totals
48-35 (+9.05 units)
57.83% Winners
To win one unit on each
Wednesday night
Angels Under 9.5 (-110)
Atlanta Under 8 (-110)
Colorado Over 5.5 (-120) NHL
To win one unit on each
Falcon Sports
Interesting, so the model gives you a' projected' total, and for (example ) a two run differential from the posted line.....you pull the trigger?....
?? Thanks
Interesting, so the model gives you a' projected' total, and for (example ) a two run differential from the posted line.....you pull the trigger?....
?? Thanks
@Rip100
Something like that. But 2 runs would be extremely high. I doubt my models projection and the books projection would be that much. In fact the majority of the time, my number and the books number match exactly.
I'll tell u this. It's cut and dried in the NFL and NBA. 3pt difference in NFL. 5pts in the NBA to trigger a play but it's not uncommon for the NBA to get bigger.
As for baseball and hockey, the difference is much smaller and a probability factor is included.
Falcon Sports
@Rip100
Something like that. But 2 runs would be extremely high. I doubt my models projection and the books projection would be that much. In fact the majority of the time, my number and the books number match exactly.
I'll tell u this. It's cut and dried in the NFL and NBA. 3pt difference in NFL. 5pts in the NBA to trigger a play but it's not uncommon for the NBA to get bigger.
As for baseball and hockey, the difference is much smaller and a probability factor is included.
Falcon Sports
I try to keep my models very current. And by that I mean, when we get to August in the baseball season, what these teams did in April will be almost irrelevant.
I'm a big believer in MATH winning out. The books have the best math that anyone could have but it's my belief that they do not always use it. I believe they use more of a perceived number.
I believe they will post a number that will draw equal action on both the over and under and that number is not always the best mathematical number. This is the key.
Math beats Perception.
Falcon Sports
I try to keep my models very current. And by that I mean, when we get to August in the baseball season, what these teams did in April will be almost irrelevant.
I'm a big believer in MATH winning out. The books have the best math that anyone could have but it's my belief that they do not always use it. I believe they use more of a perceived number.
I believe they will post a number that will draw equal action on both the over and under and that number is not always the best mathematical number. This is the key.
Math beats Perception.
Falcon Sports
I try to keep my models very current. And by that I mean, when we get to August in the baseball season, what these teams did in April will be almost irrelevant.
I'm a big believer in MATH winning out. The books have the best math that anyone could have but it's my belief that they do not always use it. I believe they use more of a perceived number.
I believe they will post a number that will draw equal action on both the over and under and that number is not always the best mathematical number. This is the key.
Math beats Perception.
Falcon Sports
I try to keep my models very current. And by that I mean, when we get to August in the baseball season, what these teams did in April will be almost irrelevant.
I'm a big believer in MATH winning out. The books have the best math that anyone could have but it's my belief that they do not always use it. I believe they use more of a perceived number.
I believe they will post a number that will draw equal action on both the over and under and that number is not always the best mathematical number. This is the key.
Math beats Perception.
Falcon Sports
Just as an example.
The Colorado/Seattle NHL game tonight should be lined at 6. In fact it is now at most books but I got a (5.5) early today. My model thinks the probability factor is very high that at least six goals are scored tonight.
But in saying this, I only project to be right every 4 times out of 7 bets (57.14%).
Good luck
Falcon Sports
Just as an example.
The Colorado/Seattle NHL game tonight should be lined at 6. In fact it is now at most books but I got a (5.5) early today. My model thinks the probability factor is very high that at least six goals are scored tonight.
But in saying this, I only project to be right every 4 times out of 7 bets (57.14%).
Good luck
Falcon Sports
Let me very clear on this.
I am not saying that I can set a better math total than the books can set. No one can do that.
I'm saying they don't always set the best math total. Possibly on purpose. My model likes to capitalize on this fact.
I have so much involved in this,,,,,, both in time and money.
This is it for me.... win or lose,,, this is it.
If this works, I'll make a fortune this year and probably have many people working for me and with me. But if it fails, this will turn back into a nice little hobby for me.
I have alot on the line here (for me).
You can watch it play out, right here on Covers.
Falcon Sports
Let me very clear on this.
I am not saying that I can set a better math total than the books can set. No one can do that.
I'm saying they don't always set the best math total. Possibly on purpose. My model likes to capitalize on this fact.
I have so much involved in this,,,,,, both in time and money.
This is it for me.... win or lose,,, this is it.
If this works, I'll make a fortune this year and probably have many people working for me and with me. But if it fails, this will turn back into a nice little hobby for me.
I have alot on the line here (for me).
You can watch it play out, right here on Covers.
Falcon Sports
@Rip100
Yep.
I don't believe in handicapping or guessing any longer.
Every once in a while, u have to push all in, say what the F and take your chances.
Falcon Sports
@Rip100
Yep.
I don't believe in handicapping or guessing any longer.
Every once in a while, u have to push all in, say what the F and take your chances.
Falcon Sports
I've noticed. . When I get on here and post stuff, I seem to always lose. I'm not talking about the plays, I'm talking about my comments.
So starting right now,,,, until May 1,,,,, I'll post the record and the plays and keep my mouth shut.
Good luck guys
Falcon Sports
I've noticed. . When I get on here and post stuff, I seem to always lose. I'm not talking about the plays, I'm talking about my comments.
So starting right now,,,, until May 1,,,,, I'll post the record and the plays and keep my mouth shut.
Good luck guys
Falcon Sports
Falcon Sports Sports Power Totals
48-36 (+7.95 units)
57.14% Winners
To win one unit on each
Pending
Angels Under 9.5 (-110)
Colorado Over 5.5 (-120) NHL
To win one unit on each
Falcon Sports
Falcon Sports Sports Power Totals
48-36 (+7.95 units)
57.14% Winners
To win one unit on each
Pending
Angels Under 9.5 (-110)
Colorado Over 5.5 (-120) NHL
To win one unit on each
Falcon Sports
Falcon Sports Power Totals
48-38 (+5.65 units)
55.81% Winners
To win one unit on each
Thursday April 27
Pittsburgh Under 8 (-115)
Angels Under 8.5 (-110)
Mets Over 8 (-105)
To win one unit on each
Good luck guys
Falcon Sports
Falcon Sports Power Totals
48-38 (+5.65 units)
55.81% Winners
To win one unit on each
Thursday April 27
Pittsburgh Under 8 (-115)
Angels Under 8.5 (-110)
Mets Over 8 (-105)
To win one unit on each
Good luck guys
Falcon Sports
Blame me for asking the questions, your right handicapping, waste of time, betting steam, against steam, moneyline moves tried everything, 50% maybe if Lucky ..spins your brain
.
Blame me for asking the questions, your right handicapping, waste of time, betting steam, against steam, moneyline moves tried everything, 50% maybe if Lucky ..spins your brain
.
Right side, wrong side doesn't matter, books sit back and let the fools think they got it figured out, I'm from Ma ,where I live their pushing parlays, books have like. a 30,% hold on those...
.
Right side, wrong side doesn't matter, books sit back and let the fools think they got it figured out, I'm from Ma ,where I live their pushing parlays, books have like. a 30,% hold on those...
.
Falcon Sports Power Totals
49-39 (+5.55 units) (+$2775)
To win one unit on each
Friday
Miami Under 7.5 (-110)
Colorado Under 11 (-110)
Oakland Over 8.5 (-110)
To win one unit on each
Falcon Sports
Falcon Sports Power Totals
49-39 (+5.55 units) (+$2775)
To win one unit on each
Friday
Miami Under 7.5 (-110)
Colorado Under 11 (-110)
Oakland Over 8.5 (-110)
To win one unit on each
Falcon Sports
Falcon Sports Power Totals
52-39 (+8.55 units) (+$4275)
57.14% Winners
To win one unit on each
I've made a little money in April. Good for me.
But seriously, check that win percentage. Exactly as projected.
Falcon Sports
Falcon Sports Power Totals
52-39 (+8.55 units) (+$4275)
57.14% Winners
To win one unit on each
I've made a little money in April. Good for me.
But seriously, check that win percentage. Exactly as projected.
Falcon Sports
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.