Used to be Royals, now I can't think of 1 team I would feel comfortable turning the ball over to.
Mariners with a 4 run lead in the 9th and 1 out and POS Gas Cans Wilhelmsen, Smith and Rasmuussen give up 3 runs on 8 batters fcking up my -1 RL- and these guys are acting like they just won the World Series
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
Used to be Royals, now I can't think of 1 team I would feel comfortable turning the ball over to.
Mariners with a 4 run lead in the 9th and 1 out and POS Gas Cans Wilhelmsen, Smith and Rasmuussen give up 3 runs on 8 batters fcking up my -1 RL- and these guys are acting like they just won the World Series
Mostly as of late. It just seems that if there is a 2-4 run lead, it's almost guaranteed that even if the BP doesn't blow the game, they give up a couple of runs. As I said earlier, if you gave the Royals a lead from the 7th on, it was as good as a win.
Tonight, for instance, M's hold Rockies to 4 Runs through 8, then 3 different Relievers give up 3 runs in the 9th.
0
Quote Originally Posted by BarneysDad:
as of late or season as a whole
Mostly as of late. It just seems that if there is a 2-4 run lead, it's almost guaranteed that even if the BP doesn't blow the game, they give up a couple of runs. As I said earlier, if you gave the Royals a lead from the 7th on, it was as good as a win.
Tonight, for instance, M's hold Rockies to 4 Runs through 8, then 3 different Relievers give up 3 runs in the 9th.
I hate to be a Negative Ned, but Richards was on a roll, and in the zone, striking out 11, and Scocia is taking him out, and this game will get closer than it needs to- and I really hope I'm wrong
0
I hate to be a Negative Ned, but Richards was on a roll, and in the zone, striking out 11, and Scocia is taking him out, and this game will get closer than it needs to- and I really hope I'm wrong
So what exactly did that accomplish bringing Ramos in, that Richards couldn't have done better He gets behind right away 3-0, then fumbles a routine ground ball that should've been a DP. Had Richards been in, I believe the Angels would be hitting right now
0
So what exactly did that accomplish bringing Ramos in, that Richards couldn't have done better He gets behind right away 3-0, then fumbles a routine ground ball that should've been a DP. Had Richards been in, I believe the Angels would be hitting right now
Just like I alluded to- Scioscia make that change, and it's much closer than it needed to be. I mean, if Richards were in trouble, then maybe make the change, but he gave up a walk, then got a K. So the textbook on Situational Baseball says to make the change, so he does.
Just like Mattingly reading the book, rather than his instincts yesterday, and it came back to bite him.
Just hope Street doesn't need the 2 run lead that he should've had coming into the bottom of 9.
0
Just like I alluded to- Scioscia make that change, and it's much closer than it needed to be. I mean, if Richards were in trouble, then maybe make the change, but he gave up a walk, then got a K. So the textbook on Situational Baseball says to make the change, so he does.
Just like Mattingly reading the book, rather than his instincts yesterday, and it came back to bite him.
Just hope Street doesn't need the 2 run lead that he should've had coming into the bottom of 9.
Great title for this thread pretty much sums up the terrible and awful bullpen of Mariners. Arizona which gave up 4 runs in the 9th with 1 out almost losing the RL. Why are these teams so bad.
0
Great title for this thread pretty much sums up the terrible and awful bullpen of Mariners. Arizona which gave up 4 runs in the 9th with 1 out almost losing the RL. Why are these teams so bad.
I've shared the script - and it cashed. Just as I stated - MLB, NBA, NFL - even college sports - is all part of a global scam - it's entertainment. Every match is carefully scripted - it is foolish for most to bet on these so called "sports" - but if you know the script or have the slightest idea of how it was written, then you can take it to your advantage and win loads of money.
0
Quote Originally Posted by fadeORdie:
Indians lose by one to cover RL
I've shared the script - and it cashed. Just as I stated - MLB, NBA, NFL - even college sports - is all part of a global scam - it's entertainment. Every match is carefully scripted - it is foolish for most to bet on these so called "sports" - but if you know the script or have the slightest idea of how it was written, then you can take it to your advantage and win loads of money.
If it was a righty Richards probably would have stayed in. His pitched count was around 110 as well...
That's exactly my point about Situational Baseball. You don't need a Manager simply hire some computer whiz kid that can read all the statistics/ analytics ect and Play by the Book. I brought this up last night with Mattingly giving the game away because he went by the Book rather than using his gut feel and knowledge of his Pitchers/ skills. Same thing Scioscia did tonight, that came back to bite, but not kill them, which it very easily could've.
You think Laussa, Cox, Martin, Stengal, Sparky.........relied on that crap when making their Managerial decisions?
Anyway, I'm getting off the track of the original Thread. To your question Austin- yes I would feel very comfortable going into the 7th w the lead and K.C. B.P, but they've been more vulnerable lately than earlier in the year. Along with most BP's like Picks alluded to above.
Bottom line is Angels won, but didn't need to make it as close as it was because playing Situational, rather than Instinctual seem to cause more lost opportunities than it creates- not just tonight, but overall in recent MLB.
More than enough B.S. from me. However, I did lose my RL wager on the M's game tonight due in whole to crappy BP's
G'Night and Good Luck to all tomorrow
0
Quote Originally Posted by AustinM:
If it was a righty Richards probably would have stayed in. His pitched count was around 110 as well...
That's exactly my point about Situational Baseball. You don't need a Manager simply hire some computer whiz kid that can read all the statistics/ analytics ect and Play by the Book. I brought this up last night with Mattingly giving the game away because he went by the Book rather than using his gut feel and knowledge of his Pitchers/ skills. Same thing Scioscia did tonight, that came back to bite, but not kill them, which it very easily could've.
You think Laussa, Cox, Martin, Stengal, Sparky.........relied on that crap when making their Managerial decisions?
Anyway, I'm getting off the track of the original Thread. To your question Austin- yes I would feel very comfortable going into the 7th w the lead and K.C. B.P, but they've been more vulnerable lately than earlier in the year. Along with most BP's like Picks alluded to above.
Bottom line is Angels won, but didn't need to make it as close as it was because playing Situational, rather than Instinctual seem to cause more lost opportunities than it creates- not just tonight, but overall in recent MLB.
More than enough B.S. from me. However, I did lose my RL wager on the M's game tonight due in whole to crappy BP's
Herrera is extremely reliable, Wade is immortal and is by far the best setup man in baseball. Yes, he is even better than Betances for all you naysayers. Holland is the one who has dropped off for sure. Fastball velocity is 93-94 instead of 96+ like previous years, and his command is not near as sharp.
0
Herrera is extremely reliable, Wade is immortal and is by far the best setup man in baseball. Yes, he is even better than Betances for all you naysayers. Holland is the one who has dropped off for sure. Fastball velocity is 93-94 instead of 96+ like previous years, and his command is not near as sharp.
Why in the name of god did "entertainment" come before "sports"???
It should be termed SEPN if you ask me. It's a "sports" channel, is it not???
The people who created ESPN (mostly Hebrews) did not wish to falsify that their so called "sports" was in fact just an entertainment. I guess they wanted to cover their behinds just in case the world found out the truth about their filthy dealings.
0
Why is there an E in front of P on ESPN?
Entertainment and Sports Programming Network
Why in the name of god did "entertainment" come before "sports"???
It should be termed SEPN if you ask me. It's a "sports" channel, is it not???
The people who created ESPN (mostly Hebrews) did not wish to falsify that their so called "sports" was in fact just an entertainment. I guess they wanted to cover their behinds just in case the world found out the truth about their filthy dealings.
Why in the name of god did "entertainment" come before "sports"???
It should be termed SEPN if you ask me. It's a "sports" channel, is it not???
The people who created ESPN (mostly Hebrews) did not wish to falsify that their so called "sports" was in fact just an entertainment. I guess they wanted to cover their behinds just in case the world found out the truth about their filthy dealings.
So pardon me for being skeptical of your "Script" (ya- you called it tonight), but why are you wasting time with us "mere mortals' when you should be off sailing your private Yacht form all your gambling profits since you know every outcome of every game and should either be rich beyond your means from wagering or going Tout? Just seem too easy....and again WHY?
0
Quote Originally Posted by fadeORdie:
Why is there an E in front of P on ESPN?
Entertainment and Sports Programming Network
Why in the name of god did "entertainment" come before "sports"???
It should be termed SEPN if you ask me. It's a "sports" channel, is it not???
The people who created ESPN (mostly Hebrews) did not wish to falsify that their so called "sports" was in fact just an entertainment. I guess they wanted to cover their behinds just in case the world found out the truth about their filthy dealings.
So pardon me for being skeptical of your "Script" (ya- you called it tonight), but why are you wasting time with us "mere mortals' when you should be off sailing your private Yacht form all your gambling profits since you know every outcome of every game and should either be rich beyond your means from wagering or going Tout? Just seem too easy....and again WHY?
So pardon me for being skeptical of your "Script" (ya- you called it tonight), but why are you wasting time with us "mere mortals' when you should be off sailing your private Yacht form all your gambling profits since you know every outcome of every game and should either be rich beyond your means from wagering or going Tout? Just seem too easy....and again WHY?
These scripts are only handed out to a select few. Being a "mere mortal", I don't have the privilege to be handed these daily. The only thing I CAN do, is "believe" that a certain game is fixed and stick to it.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Hog_Wild:
So pardon me for being skeptical of your "Script" (ya- you called it tonight), but why are you wasting time with us "mere mortals' when you should be off sailing your private Yacht form all your gambling profits since you know every outcome of every game and should either be rich beyond your means from wagering or going Tout? Just seem too easy....and again WHY?
These scripts are only handed out to a select few. Being a "mere mortal", I don't have the privilege to be handed these daily. The only thing I CAN do, is "believe" that a certain game is fixed and stick to it.
And since only the "chosen Few" are handed the script, how do you decide which games there are scripts for- or are you saying there are scripts for every game to some extent.
I mean, do you just wake up in the morning and look at the Games/ Lines and say to yourself...."hmmmm- this Game is going to be Scripted, and here is the cast and the outcome? And if that is the case, why aren't you wagering heavy on what you perceive how the script is played out. Even if you're right a majority of the time, you should have odds/ outcomes better than the best Cappers on this Forum
0
And since only the "chosen Few" are handed the script, how do you decide which games there are scripts for- or are you saying there are scripts for every game to some extent.
I mean, do you just wake up in the morning and look at the Games/ Lines and say to yourself...."hmmmm- this Game is going to be Scripted, and here is the cast and the outcome? And if that is the case, why aren't you wagering heavy on what you perceive how the script is played out. Even if you're right a majority of the time, you should have odds/ outcomes better than the best Cappers on this Forum
Then don't bet the RL!!! Only bet what the team cares about I.e if they win you win and vice versa. There are plenty of other games on the slate every day to choose from
0
Then don't bet the RL!!! Only bet what the team cares about I.e if they win you win and vice versa. There are plenty of other games on the slate every day to choose from
So like I said last night. I can see giving up a hit or 2, but how does Bedrosian leave one hanging there like he just did. Just plain stupid crappy pitch
0
So like I said last night. I can see giving up a hit or 2, but how does Bedrosian leave one hanging there like he just did. Just plain stupid crappy pitch
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.