Last year, 2011, Giants avg 3.5 runs, LA 3.9, marlins 3.7. In 2010, Giants avg, 4.3 runs Dodgers 4.1 Marlins 4.4. In the last 2 years, the Giants have scored more runs than both LA and Marlins. What else do you got?
2011 run support : 3.5 runs is less than both 3.9 and 3.7 ...
Ok either this guy is ignorant or blind and I hate discriminating against those with handicaps. That is just one of the many dumb spiteful comments this guy posted throughout this eventual ironic thread. What a coincidence the day dcmc34f posts that Matt Cain is overrated he throughs a no no perfect game.... Baseball Gods I thank you for showing this poor man the light
According to Statistical genius Jeff Sagarin, Matt Cain is the 6th best pitcher in the NL behind names like guys like Gio Gonzalez and Stephen Strasburg. Oh and he's one spot ahead of your man crush Clayton Kershaw (7th). Here's the link for you to help your comprehension skills. https://www.usatoday.com/sports/sagarin/nlp12.htm
0
Quote Originally Posted by dcmc34f:
Last year, 2011, Giants avg 3.5 runs, LA 3.9, marlins 3.7. In 2010, Giants avg, 4.3 runs Dodgers 4.1 Marlins 4.4. In the last 2 years, the Giants have scored more runs than both LA and Marlins. What else do you got?
2011 run support : 3.5 runs is less than both 3.9 and 3.7 ...
Ok either this guy is ignorant or blind and I hate discriminating against those with handicaps. That is just one of the many dumb spiteful comments this guy posted throughout this eventual ironic thread. What a coincidence the day dcmc34f posts that Matt Cain is overrated he throughs a no no perfect game.... Baseball Gods I thank you for showing this poor man the light
According to Statistical genius Jeff Sagarin, Matt Cain is the 6th best pitcher in the NL behind names like guys like Gio Gonzalez and Stephen Strasburg. Oh and he's one spot ahead of your man crush Clayton Kershaw (7th). Here's the link for you to help your comprehension skills. https://www.usatoday.com/sports/sagarin/nlp12.htm
Have the owners lost their mind? How in the world can these IDIOT owners give a pitcher with an under .500 record all this money. 69-73 with an 3.35 era, in the NL too. It's not his fault, he's not stupid, like these owners are, he's going to take the money. I know, I know, tell me how GREAT he is. If he is so good, then why is his record under .500? They just won the World Series, can't blame the ole " pitched for a bad team" theory. They win the WS and he is just 13-11, WOW. Overrated pitcher if you ask me. You want a Stud pitcher, Josh Johnson. 48-23. 48 wins in 113 starts, Cain, 69 wins in 203 starts
you're an idiot
0
Quote Originally Posted by dcmc34f:
Have the owners lost their mind? How in the world can these IDIOT owners give a pitcher with an under .500 record all this money. 69-73 with an 3.35 era, in the NL too. It's not his fault, he's not stupid, like these owners are, he's going to take the money. I know, I know, tell me how GREAT he is. If he is so good, then why is his record under .500? They just won the World Series, can't blame the ole " pitched for a bad team" theory. They win the WS and he is just 13-11, WOW. Overrated pitcher if you ask me. You want a Stud pitcher, Josh Johnson. 48-23. 48 wins in 113 starts, Cain, 69 wins in 203 starts
Have the owners lost their mind? How in the world can these IDIOT owners give a pitcher with an under .500 record all this money. 69-73 with an 3.35 era, in the NL too. It's not his fault, he's not stupid, like these owners are, he's going to take the money. I know, I know, tell me how GREAT he is. If he is so good, then why is his record under .500? They just won the World Series, can't blame the ole " pitched for a bad team" theory. They win the WS and he is just 13-11, WOW. Overrated pitcher if you ask me. You want a Stud pitcher, Josh Johnson. 48-23. 48 wins in 113 starts, Cain, 69 wins in 203 starts
0
Quote Originally Posted by dcmc34f:
Have the owners lost their mind? How in the world can these IDIOT owners give a pitcher with an under .500 record all this money. 69-73 with an 3.35 era, in the NL too. It's not his fault, he's not stupid, like these owners are, he's going to take the money. I know, I know, tell me how GREAT he is. If he is so good, then why is his record under .500? They just won the World Series, can't blame the ole " pitched for a bad team" theory. They win the WS and he is just 13-11, WOW. Overrated pitcher if you ask me. You want a Stud pitcher, Josh Johnson. 48-23. 48 wins in 113 starts, Cain, 69 wins in 203 starts
2011 run support : 3.5 runs is less than both 3.9 and 3.7 ...
Ok either this guy is ignorant or blind and I hate discriminating against those with handicaps. That is just one of the many dumb spiteful comments this guy posted throughout this eventual ironic thread. What a coincidence the day dcmc34f posts that Matt Cain is overrated he throughs a no no perfect game.... Baseball Gods I thank you for showing this poor man the light
According to Statistical genius Jeff Sagarin, Matt Cain is the 6th best pitcher in the NL behind names like guys like Gio Gonzalez and Stephen Strasburg. Oh and he's one spot ahead of your man crush Clayton Kershaw (7th). Here's the link for you to help your comprehension skills. https://www.usatoday.com/sports/sagarin/nlp12.htm
He started this post in the beginning of April.
0
Quote Originally Posted by ZCore:
2011 run support : 3.5 runs is less than both 3.9 and 3.7 ...
Ok either this guy is ignorant or blind and I hate discriminating against those with handicaps. That is just one of the many dumb spiteful comments this guy posted throughout this eventual ironic thread. What a coincidence the day dcmc34f posts that Matt Cain is overrated he throughs a no no perfect game.... Baseball Gods I thank you for showing this poor man the light
According to Statistical genius Jeff Sagarin, Matt Cain is the 6th best pitcher in the NL behind names like guys like Gio Gonzalez and Stephen Strasburg. Oh and he's one spot ahead of your man crush Clayton Kershaw (7th). Here's the link for you to help your comprehension skills. https://www.usatoday.com/sports/sagarin/nlp12.htm
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.