Today's conversations were important as it is also important to get the feel of the wins with underdigs realizing how MLB works and if you look really good you can always find a game or two or three with plus odds that will cash out.
0
Today's conversations were important as it is also important to get the feel of the wins with underdigs realizing how MLB works and if you look really good you can always find a game or two or three with plus odds that will cash out.
Ashylarry I believe you had it right, that the under in the cin/was game was the smarter pick with these starters and lineups
definitely, hindsight is 20/20 but you weren't too far off on the reasoning, jordan zimmerman just happened to pitch a gem today!! i think we have to go back to what music matt was talking about with the nationals winning 70% of their home games and how it cashes out to take them at home every game by end of season. especially after losing 6 straight, appears their due for some cashes..
not sure bout tomorrow though as a sweep game is always a weary bet, especially against a team like the reds. but baileys a stud he threw well, he just struggles vs STL.. his only bad start on season.
0
Quote Originally Posted by natalieportman9:
Ashylarry I believe you had it right, that the under in the cin/was game was the smarter pick with these starters and lineups
definitely, hindsight is 20/20 but you weren't too far off on the reasoning, jordan zimmerman just happened to pitch a gem today!! i think we have to go back to what music matt was talking about with the nationals winning 70% of their home games and how it cashes out to take them at home every game by end of season. especially after losing 6 straight, appears their due for some cashes..
not sure bout tomorrow though as a sweep game is always a weary bet, especially against a team like the reds. but baileys a stud he threw well, he just struggles vs STL.. his only bad start on season.
First time in 113 years the reds are held to one hit in back to back nights. I got blinded by how much I liked Bailey I missed the #'s for zimm. Lesson learned I hope on Washington at home. I'm making it hard on myself. I really had better picks today just I didnt run with them. .
0
First time in 113 years the reds are held to one hit in back to back nights. I got blinded by how much I liked Bailey I missed the #'s for zimm. Lesson learned I hope on Washington at home. I'm making it hard on myself. I really had better picks today just I didnt run with them. .
When a line moves overnight say 20-30points, is there a general consensus on what that means?. Example: The Braves ML last night moved from +110 to +140 and they are getting killed 10-0. I don't add line movement to my handicapping process, but should I take notice of it? I generally like to make my picks the evening before, but the last few days I've lost value on 4 out of my 6 picks by the time game started. Any advice regarding when to lock in picks for baseball?
0
When a line moves overnight say 20-30points, is there a general consensus on what that means?. Example: The Braves ML last night moved from +110 to +140 and they are getting killed 10-0. I don't add line movement to my handicapping process, but should I take notice of it? I generally like to make my picks the evening before, but the last few days I've lost value on 4 out of my 6 picks by the time game started. Any advice regarding when to lock in picks for baseball?
1st time in 113 years lol.. crazy! but that's baseball.. but i do that sometimes too man, see something i really like and run with it.. but when you look deeper there's better bets to specifically diagnose what you're looking for..
like you said for bailey today, a better bet would have been the under.. but another better bet would of been under 3.5 TT Nats.. cause you can't truly predict all angles of a game, but you could predict how an individual starter will fare that day, or how a specific team matches up.. or in the case of the under how both pitchers splits are vs a team..
i try to ask myself stuff like, if this game was to go over.. why would it go over? would pitcher A struggle? would B struggle? would both? what's the weather like? what's past history like etc.. and if i don't think it'll go over then why etc..
not saying you or anyone else doesn't do that haha, but just trying to explain how i do it and see if anyone has some thoughts on it, never a right or wrong way in my opinion as long as your confident with your pick.
as you can see my record shows i'm still trying to pinpoint what bets are good for me, but the important part is what you're doing.. looking back and what could have been a better bet and why, then take these lessons into tomorrow.. never forget your wins or your losses..
i look bad now, but i won't finish this bad lol.. neither will you we'll be +1k soon enough man, patience self discipline and soaking info like a sponge, your hard work will pay off, i've already noticed both of our growth just by the juice on the bets and the reasoning.
and of course it's only April, long season, and many seasons to come, lots of learning to be had!
0
1st time in 113 years lol.. crazy! but that's baseball.. but i do that sometimes too man, see something i really like and run with it.. but when you look deeper there's better bets to specifically diagnose what you're looking for..
like you said for bailey today, a better bet would have been the under.. but another better bet would of been under 3.5 TT Nats.. cause you can't truly predict all angles of a game, but you could predict how an individual starter will fare that day, or how a specific team matches up.. or in the case of the under how both pitchers splits are vs a team..
i try to ask myself stuff like, if this game was to go over.. why would it go over? would pitcher A struggle? would B struggle? would both? what's the weather like? what's past history like etc.. and if i don't think it'll go over then why etc..
not saying you or anyone else doesn't do that haha, but just trying to explain how i do it and see if anyone has some thoughts on it, never a right or wrong way in my opinion as long as your confident with your pick.
as you can see my record shows i'm still trying to pinpoint what bets are good for me, but the important part is what you're doing.. looking back and what could have been a better bet and why, then take these lessons into tomorrow.. never forget your wins or your losses..
i look bad now, but i won't finish this bad lol.. neither will you we'll be +1k soon enough man, patience self discipline and soaking info like a sponge, your hard work will pay off, i've already noticed both of our growth just by the juice on the bets and the reasoning.
and of course it's only April, long season, and many seasons to come, lots of learning to be had!
i like to lock in my picks late, as i have tended to notice that large favored teams tend to drop in ML value overnight, and small favorites tend to go up in value, if you can also see where the betting public is siding on, that'll influence the line movement.. what the braves line tells me is that overnight $$ was being put on the braves driving the line up..
sometimes before the game i believe when they learn someones been benched the line can move as well for that, but only a bit.. hard to tell when the 'fix' is in movement wise though, if that's what you were referring too, haven't caught that in baseball yet like i would in NCAA or NBA.. interested to see if anyone has any thoughts
0
i like to lock in my picks late, as i have tended to notice that large favored teams tend to drop in ML value overnight, and small favorites tend to go up in value, if you can also see where the betting public is siding on, that'll influence the line movement.. what the braves line tells me is that overnight $$ was being put on the braves driving the line up..
sometimes before the game i believe when they learn someones been benched the line can move as well for that, but only a bit.. hard to tell when the 'fix' is in movement wise though, if that's what you were referring too, haven't caught that in baseball yet like i would in NCAA or NBA.. interested to see if anyone has any thoughts
definitely, hindsight is 20/20 but you weren't too far off on the reasoning, jordan zimmerman just happened to pitch a gem today!! i think we have to go back to what music matt was talking about with the nationals winning 70% of their home games and how it cashes out to take them at home every game by end of season. especially after losing 6 straight, appears their due for some cashes..
not sure bout tomorrow though as a sweep game is always a weary bet, especially against a team like the reds. but baileys a stud he threw well, he just struggles vs STL.. his only bad start on season.
This was the right call because like I said about my total prediction in tigers applied the other way, these 2 were above average pitchers against great line ups... The line going over last night meant that today's line should have risen from last night but instead dropped enticing that over pick.
I think this is why the Giants go Under as YOU eluded to in your PM.
0
Quote Originally Posted by ashylarrymp:
definitely, hindsight is 20/20 but you weren't too far off on the reasoning, jordan zimmerman just happened to pitch a gem today!! i think we have to go back to what music matt was talking about with the nationals winning 70% of their home games and how it cashes out to take them at home every game by end of season. especially after losing 6 straight, appears their due for some cashes..
not sure bout tomorrow though as a sweep game is always a weary bet, especially against a team like the reds. but baileys a stud he threw well, he just struggles vs STL.. his only bad start on season.
This was the right call because like I said about my total prediction in tigers applied the other way, these 2 were above average pitchers against great line ups... The line going over last night meant that today's line should have risen from last night but instead dropped enticing that over pick.
I think this is why the Giants go Under as YOU eluded to in your PM.
Today's conversations were important as it is also important to get the feel of the wins with underdigs realizing how MLB works and if you look really good you can always find a game or two or three with plus odds that will cash out.
Thank you for allowing me to speak. I believe in this and am starting to believe in myself. I believe in the people. I know we can and will be better!
0
Quote Originally Posted by SportsMavin:
Today's conversations were important as it is also important to get the feel of the wins with underdigs realizing how MLB works and if you look really good you can always find a game or two or three with plus odds that will cash out.
Thank you for allowing me to speak. I believe in this and am starting to believe in myself. I believe in the people. I know we can and will be better!
meant overnight $$ was being put on the tigers^^ driving the line up..
I've told you, but I absolutely believe lines are telling... I am learning more about what it means...
I think the Braves being that much of a dog was a gift and a lot bit. Royals beating Tigers less likely, especially Verlander. It was like CC vs Verlander.
I've also seen ML's within 20 of one another tends to go Under. Worley hasn't gone Over in 2 starts I believe and I also believe the lines were within 20.
0
Quote Originally Posted by ashylarrymp:
meant overnight $$ was being put on the tigers^^ driving the line up..
I've told you, but I absolutely believe lines are telling... I am learning more about what it means...
I think the Braves being that much of a dog was a gift and a lot bit. Royals beating Tigers less likely, especially Verlander. It was like CC vs Verlander.
I've also seen ML's within 20 of one another tends to go Under. Worley hasn't gone Over in 2 starts I believe and I also believe the lines were within 20.
This was the right call because like I said about my total prediction in tigers applied the other way, these 2 were above average pitchers against great line ups... The line going over last night meant that today's line should have risen from last night but instead dropped enticing that over pick.
I think this is why the Giants go Under as YOU eluded to in your PM.
Also your pick, lol!
0
Quote Originally Posted by Musicmatt1:
This was the right call because like I said about my total prediction in tigers applied the other way, these 2 were above average pitchers against great line ups... The line going over last night meant that today's line should have risen from last night but instead dropped enticing that over pick.
I think this is why the Giants go Under as YOU eluded to in your PM.
I've told you, but I absolutely believe lines are telling... I am learning more about what it means...
I think the Braves being that much of a dog was a gift and a lot bit. Royals beating Tigers less likely, especially Verlander. It was like CC vs Verlander.
I've also seen ML's within 20 of one another tends to go Under. Worley hasn't gone Over in 2 starts I believe and I also believe the lines were within 20.
such good observations man! instead of just blindly betting day to day, we should really remember the lines from previous days and compare them to what's out tomorrow.. sometimes it's easy to get caught up in a pitcher and what stats they have as opposed to what the line is offering on that given day,
of course no trend is concrete, but they can definitely help you when it comes to influencing your picks/ noticing a trap game..
and we already discussed one time about mondays and tuesdays and how those tend to be getaway days/ start of new series.. and how travel time/ player fatigue can take effect on these days.. another thing to monitor, dont know what it means, but i can't get over that Tuesdays in particular have been miserable for the forum and my personal bankroll.. very interested to see how we fare next tuesday and monday. and what games are upsets those days and why.
side note mil-lad looks to be nearing right around the number, it was a low total, but might be due to pitchers park and unfamiliarity of burgos to the dodgers hitters.. just a guess.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Musicmatt1:
I've told you, but I absolutely believe lines are telling... I am learning more about what it means...
I think the Braves being that much of a dog was a gift and a lot bit. Royals beating Tigers less likely, especially Verlander. It was like CC vs Verlander.
I've also seen ML's within 20 of one another tends to go Under. Worley hasn't gone Over in 2 starts I believe and I also believe the lines were within 20.
such good observations man! instead of just blindly betting day to day, we should really remember the lines from previous days and compare them to what's out tomorrow.. sometimes it's easy to get caught up in a pitcher and what stats they have as opposed to what the line is offering on that given day,
of course no trend is concrete, but they can definitely help you when it comes to influencing your picks/ noticing a trap game..
and we already discussed one time about mondays and tuesdays and how those tend to be getaway days/ start of new series.. and how travel time/ player fatigue can take effect on these days.. another thing to monitor, dont know what it means, but i can't get over that Tuesdays in particular have been miserable for the forum and my personal bankroll.. very interested to see how we fare next tuesday and monday. and what games are upsets those days and why.
side note mil-lad looks to be nearing right around the number, it was a low total, but might be due to pitchers park and unfamiliarity of burgos to the dodgers hitters.. just a guess.
another note, like i said in my pregame write up.. san diego is where the giants bats go to die!! wouldn't be surprised to see giants get swept but realistically probably lose 2 out of 3.. San Diego is haunted to San Francisco lol, tough place to win for giants!
0
another note, like i said in my pregame write up.. san diego is where the giants bats go to die!! wouldn't be surprised to see giants get swept but realistically probably lose 2 out of 3.. San Diego is haunted to San Francisco lol, tough place to win for giants!
such good observations man! instead of just blindly betting day to day, we should really remember the lines from previous days and compare them to what's out tomorrow.. sometimes it's easy to get caught up in a pitcher and what stats they have as opposed to what the line is offering on that given day,
of course no trend is concrete, but they can definitely help you when it comes to influencing your picks/ noticing a trap game..
and we already discussed one time about mondays and tuesdays and how those tend to be getaway days/ start of new series.. and how travel time/ player fatigue can take effect on these days.. another thing to monitor, dont know what it means, but i can't get over that Tuesdays in particular have been miserable for the forum and my personal bankroll.. very interested to see how we fare next tuesday and monday. and what games are upsets those days and why.
side note mil-lad looks to be nearing right around the number, it was a low total, but might be due to pitchers park and unfamiliarity of burgos to the dodgers hitters.. just a guess.
Monday and Tuesday will have the Series Lines so we should be able to use this to our advantage. One big example of this was this past Rays/Yanks series. The line told me to bet against CC the first game, amongst other line factors we talk about. These things support the write ups.
0
Quote Originally Posted by ashylarrymp:
such good observations man! instead of just blindly betting day to day, we should really remember the lines from previous days and compare them to what's out tomorrow.. sometimes it's easy to get caught up in a pitcher and what stats they have as opposed to what the line is offering on that given day,
of course no trend is concrete, but they can definitely help you when it comes to influencing your picks/ noticing a trap game..
and we already discussed one time about mondays and tuesdays and how those tend to be getaway days/ start of new series.. and how travel time/ player fatigue can take effect on these days.. another thing to monitor, dont know what it means, but i can't get over that Tuesdays in particular have been miserable for the forum and my personal bankroll.. very interested to see how we fare next tuesday and monday. and what games are upsets those days and why.
side note mil-lad looks to be nearing right around the number, it was a low total, but might be due to pitchers park and unfamiliarity of burgos to the dodgers hitters.. just a guess.
Monday and Tuesday will have the Series Lines so we should be able to use this to our advantage. One big example of this was this past Rays/Yanks series. The line told me to bet against CC the first game, amongst other line factors we talk about. These things support the write ups.
Sry i cant contribute to these discussions, i disagree and thats not whats decides the game of baseball and its winning and losing dynamics. Im very aware of all the angles and metrics, just need sufficient time to breakdown matchups to determine the highest valued outcomes for investing.
0
Sry i cant contribute to these discussions, i disagree and thats not whats decides the game of baseball and its winning and losing dynamics. Im very aware of all the angles and metrics, just need sufficient time to breakdown matchups to determine the highest valued outcomes for investing.
another though i had was on Anibal Sanchez.. he threw 121 pitches tonight and struck out 17 batters.. any thoughts on fading him his next start?? kind of on the same thoughts of a pitcher 1st start after a no hitter tends to struggle because they were over extended during the previous game.. if anibal does feel fine, feel leyland won't let him go over 100 pitches next outing to not over do his arm so early in the season.. something to watch for and perhaps fade pending on the matchup..
not worried about jordan zimmermans cg as it took him only 91 pitches.. just thoughts but figure pitchers that go that high in pitch count this early.. has to be an after effect to it.
0
another though i had was on Anibal Sanchez.. he threw 121 pitches tonight and struck out 17 batters.. any thoughts on fading him his next start?? kind of on the same thoughts of a pitcher 1st start after a no hitter tends to struggle because they were over extended during the previous game.. if anibal does feel fine, feel leyland won't let him go over 100 pitches next outing to not over do his arm so early in the season.. something to watch for and perhaps fade pending on the matchup..
not worried about jordan zimmermans cg as it took him only 91 pitches.. just thoughts but figure pitchers that go that high in pitch count this early.. has to be an after effect to it.
another though i had was on Anibal Sanchez.. he threw 121 pitches tonight and struck out 17 batters.. any thoughts on fading him his next start?? kind of on the same thoughts of a pitcher 1st start after a no hitter tends to struggle because they were over extended during the previous game.. if anibal does feel fine, feel leyland won't let him go over 100 pitches next outing to not over do his arm so early in the season.. something to watch for and perhaps fade pending on the matchup..
not worried about jordan zimmermans cg as it took him only 91 pitches.. just thoughts but figure pitchers that go that high in pitch count this early.. has to be an after effect to it.
I like the way you are thinking there Ash, these are the types of plays that I try to make, Fading a pitcher after a great start or playing him after bad start.I know I am the weakest link here right now but most of my reads on the starting pitchers have been practically spot on.Take the braves game in colorado that tim hudson was pitching, hudson has a history throughout his career of bouncing back strong after a bad outing, something like 5 ER or more, and he did pitch well as I predicted but kimbrel who is usually automatic blew the 2 run lead in the 9th with 2 out, same thing with the bluejays game that same day, bullpen blew the 3 run lead.The bullpens blew the lead but my reads on the pitchers were right, the bullpens won't blow every lead so I'm confident that my record will get better after april which can be kind of fluky, either that or I will adjust maybe to five or seven inning bets.there are sites that give you the breakdown for every start for a pitchers career, and if you observe closely you can see certain patterns that some pitchers have.Some get into grooves some are more inconsistent, some will have a bad start after throwing over 100 pitches some won't.Teams even have certain patterns, coming back from a long road trip certain teams love coming back home some have a let down.The key is doing the dirty work and trying to find those patterns because it can be different for every pitcher.And yes lines are very important also, just like in basketball when we see teams that are too big of favorites than they should be, then you know you should bet against them.Like last night the Braves, the lines were clearly trying to get you to bet the braves by sending out an overvalued dog line on them.I might not seem like someone that knows anything right now but this way of thinking brought me a lot of success last season and I'm sure it will bring more as the season goes on.Cheers gentlemen!
0
Quote Originally Posted by ashylarrymp:
another though i had was on Anibal Sanchez.. he threw 121 pitches tonight and struck out 17 batters.. any thoughts on fading him his next start?? kind of on the same thoughts of a pitcher 1st start after a no hitter tends to struggle because they were over extended during the previous game.. if anibal does feel fine, feel leyland won't let him go over 100 pitches next outing to not over do his arm so early in the season.. something to watch for and perhaps fade pending on the matchup..
not worried about jordan zimmermans cg as it took him only 91 pitches.. just thoughts but figure pitchers that go that high in pitch count this early.. has to be an after effect to it.
I like the way you are thinking there Ash, these are the types of plays that I try to make, Fading a pitcher after a great start or playing him after bad start.I know I am the weakest link here right now but most of my reads on the starting pitchers have been practically spot on.Take the braves game in colorado that tim hudson was pitching, hudson has a history throughout his career of bouncing back strong after a bad outing, something like 5 ER or more, and he did pitch well as I predicted but kimbrel who is usually automatic blew the 2 run lead in the 9th with 2 out, same thing with the bluejays game that same day, bullpen blew the 3 run lead.The bullpens blew the lead but my reads on the pitchers were right, the bullpens won't blow every lead so I'm confident that my record will get better after april which can be kind of fluky, either that or I will adjust maybe to five or seven inning bets.there are sites that give you the breakdown for every start for a pitchers career, and if you observe closely you can see certain patterns that some pitchers have.Some get into grooves some are more inconsistent, some will have a bad start after throwing over 100 pitches some won't.Teams even have certain patterns, coming back from a long road trip certain teams love coming back home some have a let down.The key is doing the dirty work and trying to find those patterns because it can be different for every pitcher.And yes lines are very important also, just like in basketball when we see teams that are too big of favorites than they should be, then you know you should bet against them.Like last night the Braves, the lines were clearly trying to get you to bet the braves by sending out an overvalued dog line on them.I might not seem like someone that knows anything right now but this way of thinking brought me a lot of success last season and I'm sure it will bring more as the season goes on.Cheers gentlemen!
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.