There were 11 bets yesterday, no idea where you got only 4 from.
I have a lot more than 3 bets today as early as 9am this morning. Either you're having trouble reading the sheet or you're not understanding something. I am sorry.
There were 11 bets yesterday, no idea where you got only 4 from.
I have a lot more than 3 bets today as early as 9am this morning. Either you're having trouble reading the sheet or you're not understanding something. I am sorry.
There are only 3 with dollar amounts associated with them for today.
Yesterday there were only 5, with 4 losses and 1 void. You added the dollar amounts to all the rest later after the games had finished.
I see you corrected your errant Atlanta win claim. Now you have it listed as suspended.
There are only 3 with dollar amounts associated with them for today.
Yesterday there were only 5, with 4 losses and 1 void. You added the dollar amounts to all the rest later after the games had finished.
I see you corrected your errant Atlanta win claim. Now you have it listed as suspended.
As I suspected you're not understanding how to read the doc. All Money line plays are in column M. The risk in column K is what the Vegas odds are in column D. Get it?
As I suspected you're not understanding how to read the doc. All Money line plays are in column M. The risk in column K is what the Vegas odds are in column D. Get it?
That should read the risk in column M is what the Vegas odds are in column D because it's implied. When it's -1, or -1.5 is when you'll see an actual number in column M because it doesn't correspond to the money line odds.
That should read the risk in column M is what the Vegas odds are in column D because it's implied. When it's -1, or -1.5 is when you'll see an actual number in column M because it doesn't correspond to the money line odds.
If i'm confused, then probably others are, have been & will be, too. I see 10 percentages highlighted. Add the total to that & it makes 11. So how do you get only 9 plays? Are these, then, the plays today:
TB -1 -119
Cleve -120
Cubs under 12.5 -110
Boston -140
Phila -135
Balt +101
St Louis -149
Atlanta -1.5 -115
Minn -225
KC -140
Colorado +133
That makes 11, not 9.
If i'm confused, then probably others are, have been & will be, too. I see 10 percentages highlighted. Add the total to that & it makes 11. So how do you get only 9 plays? Are these, then, the plays today:
TB -1 -119
Cleve -120
Cubs under 12.5 -110
Boston -140
Phila -135
Balt +101
St Louis -149
Atlanta -1.5 -115
Minn -225
KC -140
Colorado +133
That makes 11, not 9.
ONLY 9 ML
1 O/U
MINN IS NOT A PLAY
THE PERSON RUNNING HE'S OWN SPREAD SHEET!!!!!!!!
ONLY 9 ML
1 O/U
MINN IS NOT A PLAY
THE PERSON RUNNING HE'S OWN SPREAD SHEET!!!!!!!!
There are 10 plays right now. The one highlighted play MIN/SEA has no play yet because most books don't even have a line for it yet, nor have the Mariners submitted a line up. Once the line is released I will make a decision. If you actually took the time to read my first tab titled "read first before commenting" you'd understand how this works. Instead, you come off as an accusatory fool poking holes in someone's work. Someone who puts a lot of time and effort into something and giving it away for free. Do you not realize you'd be up THOUSANDS if you followed me this season? I'm not even looking for gratitude but wouldn't that be a better idea?
Wouldn't it be better to be 100% informed before you go around acting like this? Unbelievable dude.
There are 10 plays right now. The one highlighted play MIN/SEA has no play yet because most books don't even have a line for it yet, nor have the Mariners submitted a line up. Once the line is released I will make a decision. If you actually took the time to read my first tab titled "read first before commenting" you'd understand how this works. Instead, you come off as an accusatory fool poking holes in someone's work. Someone who puts a lot of time and effort into something and giving it away for free. Do you not realize you'd be up THOUSANDS if you followed me this season? I'm not even looking for gratitude but wouldn't that be a better idea?
Wouldn't it be better to be 100% informed before you go around acting like this? Unbelievable dude.
Dammit, this guy Peel is super legit, he found a great model for NHL (hello Peel, it's arghvaincra aka here esposito!) and now sharing his hard work for MLB, for free. Just read the sheet, anytime, anywhere and comment if you find any error. Simple is that. Why would anyone post the picks here ??
Dammit, this guy Peel is super legit, he found a great model for NHL (hello Peel, it's arghvaincra aka here esposito!) and now sharing his hard work for MLB, for free. Just read the sheet, anytime, anywhere and comment if you find any error. Simple is that. Why would anyone post the picks here ??
Yes and yes.
Yes and yes.
There are 10 plays right now. The one highlighted play MIN/SEA has no play yet because most books don't even have a line for it yet, nor have the Mariners submitted a line up.
How would anyone know Minnesota -225 is not a play? You have a line up & you have Minnesota highlighted like all the others that are plays. And there is no note there saying you're waiting for lineups etc.
I assume the other 10 i listed are plays. But i'm still waiting for you or anyone to answer the simple question with a yes or no whether the picks i posted are plays. How difficult is that? Or to post your plays on the forum where they are time stamped?
Once the line is released I will make a decision. If you actually took the time to read my first tab titled "read first before commenting" you'd understand how this works.
You're wrong because i have read it a number of times.
Instead, you come off as an accusatory fool poking holes in someone's work. Someone who puts a lot of time and effort into something and giving it away for free. Do you not realize you'd be up THOUSANDS if you followed me this season? I'm not even looking for gratitude but wouldn't that be a better idea? Wouldn't it be better to be 100% informed before you go around acting like this? Unbelievable dude.
I didn't hear any thank you from you for correcting your errant claim of an Atlanta win.
As for accusations, you insinuated something about sceptisism which no one had even mentioned. Evidently you dreamed up this accusation from fantasies in your own mind.
I'd suggest ceasing with the drama queen stuff & answer the simple questions posed. That would be helpful. Then get back to your capping or whatever. The drama you're creating here isn't beneficial to anyone.
There are 10 plays right now. The one highlighted play MIN/SEA has no play yet because most books don't even have a line for it yet, nor have the Mariners submitted a line up.
How would anyone know Minnesota -225 is not a play? You have a line up & you have Minnesota highlighted like all the others that are plays. And there is no note there saying you're waiting for lineups etc.
I assume the other 10 i listed are plays. But i'm still waiting for you or anyone to answer the simple question with a yes or no whether the picks i posted are plays. How difficult is that? Or to post your plays on the forum where they are time stamped?
Once the line is released I will make a decision. If you actually took the time to read my first tab titled "read first before commenting" you'd understand how this works.
You're wrong because i have read it a number of times.
Instead, you come off as an accusatory fool poking holes in someone's work. Someone who puts a lot of time and effort into something and giving it away for free. Do you not realize you'd be up THOUSANDS if you followed me this season? I'm not even looking for gratitude but wouldn't that be a better idea? Wouldn't it be better to be 100% informed before you go around acting like this? Unbelievable dude.
I didn't hear any thank you from you for correcting your errant claim of an Atlanta win.
As for accusations, you insinuated something about sceptisism which no one had even mentioned. Evidently you dreamed up this accusation from fantasies in your own mind.
I'd suggest ceasing with the drama queen stuff & answer the simple questions posed. That would be helpful. Then get back to your capping or whatever. The drama you're creating here isn't beneficial to anyone.
There are 10 plays right now. The one highlighted play MIN/SEA has no play yet because most books don't even have a line for it yet, nor have the Mariners submitted a line up.
How would anyone know Minnesota -225 is not a play? You have a money line up & you have Minnesota highlighted like all the others that are plays. And there is no note there saying you're waiting for lineups etc.
I assume the other 10 i listed are plays. But i'm still waiting for you or anyone to answer the simple question with a yes or no whether the picks i posted are plays. How difficult is that? Or to post your plays on the forum where they are time stamped?
Once the line is released I will make a decision. If you actually took the time to read my first tab titled "read first before commenting" you'd understand how this works.
You're wrong because i have read it a number of times.
Instead, you come off as an accusatory fool poking holes in someone's work. Someone who puts a lot of time and effort into something and giving it away for free. Do you not realize you'd be up THOUSANDS if you followed me this season? I'm not even looking for gratitude but wouldn't that be a better idea? Wouldn't it be better to be 100% informed before you go around acting like this? Unbelievable dude.
I didn't hear any thank you from you for correcting your errant claim of an Atlanta win.
As for accusations, you insinuated something about skepticism which no one had even mentioned. Evidently you dreamed up this accusation from fantasies in your own mind.
I'd suggest ceasing with the drama queen stuff & answer the simple questions posed. That would be helpful. Then get back to your capping or whatever. The drama you're creating here isn't beneficial to anyone.
There are 10 plays right now. The one highlighted play MIN/SEA has no play yet because most books don't even have a line for it yet, nor have the Mariners submitted a line up.
How would anyone know Minnesota -225 is not a play? You have a money line up & you have Minnesota highlighted like all the others that are plays. And there is no note there saying you're waiting for lineups etc.
I assume the other 10 i listed are plays. But i'm still waiting for you or anyone to answer the simple question with a yes or no whether the picks i posted are plays. How difficult is that? Or to post your plays on the forum where they are time stamped?
Once the line is released I will make a decision. If you actually took the time to read my first tab titled "read first before commenting" you'd understand how this works.
You're wrong because i have read it a number of times.
Instead, you come off as an accusatory fool poking holes in someone's work. Someone who puts a lot of time and effort into something and giving it away for free. Do you not realize you'd be up THOUSANDS if you followed me this season? I'm not even looking for gratitude but wouldn't that be a better idea? Wouldn't it be better to be 100% informed before you go around acting like this? Unbelievable dude.
I didn't hear any thank you from you for correcting your errant claim of an Atlanta win.
As for accusations, you insinuated something about skepticism which no one had even mentioned. Evidently you dreamed up this accusation from fantasies in your own mind.
I'd suggest ceasing with the drama queen stuff & answer the simple questions posed. That would be helpful. Then get back to your capping or whatever. The drama you're creating here isn't beneficial to anyone.
.....
There are 10 plays right now. The one highlighted play MIN/SEA has no play yet because most books don't even have a line for it yet, nor have the Mariners submitted a line up.
How would anyone know Minnesota -225 is not a play? You have a line up & you have Minnesota highlighted like all the others that are plays. And there is no note there saying you're waiting for lineups etc.
I assume the other 10 i listed are plays. But i'm still waiting for you or anyone to answer the simple question with a yes or no whether the picks i posted are plays. How difficult is that? Or to post your plays on the forum where they are time stamped?
.....
There are 10 plays right now. The one highlighted play MIN/SEA has no play yet because most books don't even have a line for it yet, nor have the Mariners submitted a line up.
How would anyone know Minnesota -225 is not a play? You have a line up & you have Minnesota highlighted like all the others that are plays. And there is no note there saying you're waiting for lineups etc.
I assume the other 10 i listed are plays. But i'm still waiting for you or anyone to answer the simple question with a yes or no whether the picks i posted are plays. How difficult is that? Or to post your plays on the forum where they are time stamped?
There are 10 plays right now. The one highlighted play MIN/SEA has no play yet because most books don't even have a line for it yet, nor have the Mariners submitted a line up.
How would anyone know Minnesota -225 is not a play? You have a line up & you have Minnesota highlighted like all the others that are plays. And there is no note there saying you're waiting for lineups etc.
I assume the other 10 i listed are plays. But i'm still waiting for you or anyone to answer the simple question with a yes or no whether the picks i posted are plays. How difficult is that? Or to post your plays on the forum where they are time stamped?
There are 10 plays right now. The one highlighted play MIN/SEA has no play yet because most books don't even have a line for it yet, nor have the Mariners submitted a line up.
How would anyone know Minnesota -225 is not a play? You have a line up & you have Minnesota highlighted like all the others that are plays. And there is no note there saying you're waiting for lineups etc.
I assume the other 10 i listed are plays. But i'm still waiting for you or anyone to answer the simple question with a yes or no whether the picks i posted are plays. How difficult is that? Or to post your plays on the forum where they are time stamped?
Tuck- Mikolas has 1 start with Wolf 5 years ago. I have a hard time correlating that with today. Home teams are also 5-8 with Wolf this season.
Tuck- Mikolas has 1 start with Wolf 5 years ago. I have a hard time correlating that with today. Home teams are also 5-8 with Wolf this season.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.