Appeal DENIED. There must have been at least 5 minutes available to use anyone's computer or phone to let the aggrieved party know the circumstances. The aggrieved party's Email and phone were both available and monitored 24/7.
Yes Master you are right,I do not know what I was thinking to even have another point of view,you are correct and I am wrong again.I should be SHOT to even suggest you were in any way to blame.
0
Quote Originally Posted by KeyElement:
Appeal DENIED. There must have been at least 5 minutes available to use anyone's computer or phone to let the aggrieved party know the circumstances. The aggrieved party's Email and phone were both available and monitored 24/7.
Yes Master you are right,I do not know what I was thinking to even have another point of view,you are correct and I am wrong again.I should be SHOT to even suggest you were in any way to blame.
Yes Master you are right,I do not know what I was thinking to even have another point of view,you are correct and I am wrong again.I should be SHOT to even suggest you were in any way to blame.
Jail time perhaps but not SHOT. That would deprive me of my favorite target for sarcastic humor. In fact, I am thinking probation. Let's not get carried away by one already forgiven offense. BUT, should we meet at some future time the beer is on you.
Now and then even a BLIND squirrel can find an acorn
0
Quote Originally Posted by JEG53:
Yes Master you are right,I do not know what I was thinking to even have another point of view,you are correct and I am wrong again.I should be SHOT to even suggest you were in any way to blame.
Jail time perhaps but not SHOT. That would deprive me of my favorite target for sarcastic humor. In fact, I am thinking probation. Let's not get carried away by one already forgiven offense. BUT, should we meet at some future time the beer is on you.
The plays are correct but you would have to ask the Covers techies why the posting is not complete or worth diddly squat. There is much more to read but it is not posting.
Blah blah blah we know you do research behind the scenes - BORING
Just post your picks and make sure they're winners
[sarcastic emoji thing]
0
Quote Originally Posted by KeyElement:
The plays are correct but you would have to ask the Covers techies why the posting is not complete or worth diddly squat. There is much more to read but it is not posting.
Blah blah blah we know you do research behind the scenes - BORING
Just post your picks and make sure they're winners
Key you turning into a FG player now? Lets not slip and forget about the F5 bro!!
as for me im taking Royals/A's under 5 F5 @-115
I dunno about that pick. I suppose I could explain but it would take an essay and Ramanujan would get BORED, so I won't go there,except to say that when we disagree there is a 100% chance one of us is right. Maybe there is such a thing as a lock.
Now and then even a BLIND squirrel can find an acorn
0
Quote Originally Posted by backdooor_cover:
Key you turning into a FG player now? Lets not slip and forget about the F5 bro!!
as for me im taking Royals/A's under 5 F5 @-115
I dunno about that pick. I suppose I could explain but it would take an essay and Ramanujan would get BORED, so I won't go there,except to say that when we disagree there is a 100% chance one of us is right. Maybe there is such a thing as a lock.
Key you turning into a FG player now? Lets not slip and forget about the F5 bro!!
as for me im taking Royals/A's under 5 F5 @-115
Now then, (essay time Ramanujan, you are dismissed) about the 5 inning thing. I LUV 5 inning wagering, and most of what I post can be played that way, but a few years ago I got tired of the lines opening so late and the best plays having odds adjusted against me, I caved in and went over to the dark side.I still play an occasional 5 inning under, but I can't stomach my +155 dog at 4 A.M. being +115 by the time the 5 inning lines open.
Now and then even a BLIND squirrel can find an acorn
0
Quote Originally Posted by backdooor_cover:
Key you turning into a FG player now? Lets not slip and forget about the F5 bro!!
as for me im taking Royals/A's under 5 F5 @-115
Now then, (essay time Ramanujan, you are dismissed) about the 5 inning thing. I LUV 5 inning wagering, and most of what I post can be played that way, but a few years ago I got tired of the lines opening so late and the best plays having odds adjusted against me, I caved in and went over to the dark side.I still play an occasional 5 inning under, but I can't stomach my +155 dog at 4 A.M. being +115 by the time the 5 inning lines open.
Something is terribly wrong with the Rox bats and I doubt highly they fix it against the Bum tonight on the road
You didn't mention the White Sox and they closed at +191. I wonder if that great bullpen of the Indians can HIT, because they are going to need a lot of offense to beat us.
Now and then even a BLIND squirrel can find an acorn
0
Quote Originally Posted by Crashdavis565:
Wow
I got Rays 130 and Orioles 110
I usually get the lesser odds with your picks
Good to be tardy to this one,
Thanks for the action GL today
Something is terribly wrong with the Rox bats and I doubt highly they fix it against the Bum tonight on the road
You didn't mention the White Sox and they closed at +191. I wonder if that great bullpen of the Indians can HIT, because they are going to need a lot of offense to beat us.
Now then, (essay time Ramanujan, you are dismissed) about the 5 inning thing. I LUV 5 inning wagering, and most of what I post can be played that way, but a few years ago I got tired of the lines opening so late and the best plays having odds adjusted against me, I caved in and went over to the dark side.I still play an occasional 5 inning under, but I can't stomach my +155 dog at 4 A.M. being +115 by the time the 5 inning lines open.
agree 100% with what you are saying. Late lines on F5 can be a killer but it can also be to our favor sometimes. Just got to monitor and pick the right moments.
As to the Royals under I guess I can't always be right but I will hope this time I am
0
Quote Originally Posted by KeyElement:
Now then, (essay time Ramanujan, you are dismissed) about the 5 inning thing. I LUV 5 inning wagering, and most of what I post can be played that way, but a few years ago I got tired of the lines opening so late and the best plays having odds adjusted against me, I caved in and went over to the dark side.I still play an occasional 5 inning under, but I can't stomach my +155 dog at 4 A.M. being +115 by the time the 5 inning lines open.
agree 100% with what you are saying. Late lines on F5 can be a killer but it can also be to our favor sometimes. Just got to monitor and pick the right moments.
As to the Royals under I guess I can't always be right but I will hope this time I am
I know this could be a public play but we get him cheap cause the Giants offense hasn't been that great. Tonight Gray will help bring back the Giants offense.
small play for me 1% of the bank
0
I got 1 more to push my luck:
Giants FG RL +135
I know this could be a public play but we get him cheap cause the Giants offense hasn't been that great. Tonight Gray will help bring back the Giants offense.
I know this could be a public play but we get him cheap cause the Giants offense hasn't been that great. Tonight Gray will help bring back the Giants offense.
small play for me 1% of the bank
You know I hate home teams on the run line but, BOL
Now and then even a BLIND squirrel can find an acorn
0
Quote Originally Posted by backdooor_cover:
I got 1 more to push my luck:
Giants FG RL +135
I know this could be a public play but we get him cheap cause the Giants offense hasn't been that great. Tonight Gray will help bring back the Giants offense.
small play for me 1% of the bank
You know I hate home teams on the run line but, BOL
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.