The bankroll play amount will now be adjusted Daily, I must let the snowball effect have its impact, depending on prior days results. Discipline is a key factor in sports wagering.
Note: Innings indicated on each play
F5-Run Line Yankees -.5, -140 (Tomin/Sabathia)
There is one thing about this play I absolutely hate, and that is that I do not normally like to lay both runs and odds in a baseball game. I much prefer the +$ payback for laying a half or one-and-a-half, but very few rules are carved in stone and those came down from Mt. Sinai. The Tribe must start one of the worst starters of the season today (1-3 qs, 0-4 h2h) versus a fully rejuvenated and rehabbed Sabathia (3-2, 4-1), and do it after a long and active 20 inning day versus the Jays. Poor starter, tired players, spent bullpen and travel are not a good combination. Francona may right this one off and try to prepare for tomorrow. I wouldn’t blame him a bit. My computed 5 inning money line on this game is -348, so I think we have room to lay a half run. Don’t ask about full game. I never, never, never lay -1.5 on a home team. Who wants to sit there and pray for your opponent to score in the top of the ninth because you are only up 1? So, you get lucky and they do score one. Now you must get a man on and win with a 2 (or more) run dinger to clear the margin. Your team does not even play that way; they play for the one run to win, and end, the game. Very shaky proposition and that is why the books will pay a good price on it.
Now and then even a BLIND squirrel can find an acorn
The bankroll play amount will now be adjusted Daily, I must let the snowball effect have its impact, depending on prior days results. Discipline is a key factor in sports wagering.
Note: Innings indicated on each play
F5-Run Line Yankees -.5, -140 (Tomin/Sabathia)
There is one thing about this play I absolutely hate, and that is that I do not normally like to lay both runs and odds in a baseball game. I much prefer the +$ payback for laying a half or one-and-a-half, but very few rules are carved in stone and those came down from Mt. Sinai. The Tribe must start one of the worst starters of the season today (1-3 qs, 0-4 h2h) versus a fully rejuvenated and rehabbed Sabathia (3-2, 4-1), and do it after a long and active 20 inning day versus the Jays. Poor starter, tired players, spent bullpen and travel are not a good combination. Francona may right this one off and try to prepare for tomorrow. I wouldn’t blame him a bit. My computed 5 inning money line on this game is -348, so I think we have room to lay a half run. Don’t ask about full game. I never, never, never lay -1.5 on a home team. Who wants to sit there and pray for your opponent to score in the top of the ninth because you are only up 1? So, you get lucky and they do score one. Now you must get a man on and win with a 2 (or more) run dinger to clear the margin. Your team does not even play that way; they play for the one run to win, and end, the game. Very shaky proposition and that is why the books will pay a good price on it.
F5- Pirates-Brewers Under 4.5, -125, (Kingham/Guerra)
Kingham looked impressive his first outing, and this will be the Brewers first experience with him. But, he is 26 years old with 7 years of minor league experience and has to be considered mature in a baseball sense. It can be trouble to face a guy like that and he may get through the Brewers order twice with no problems. Junior Guerra is blooming nicely but is scarcely noticed by most bettors, especially those that ignore pitching. The Brewers offense is very average and the Pirates have disappeared their last 4 games versus righty. The early part of this game should be a pitcher’s duel.
FG- Cardinals -105, (Quintana/Mikolas)
The Cubs are playing OK ball, but nothing impressive or intimidating and Quintana is off to a slow, shaky start, with only 2 quality starts in his first 5, both versus the Brewers, away then home; but the Brewers are not nearly the lefty hitting club the Cardinals are. I suppose some trend follower will tell us Quintana is 4-0 versus the Cardinals, 2 with the White Sox and 2 with the Cubs, but that was then, and this is now. Trends followed blindly can be very deceiving and disappointing.
BOL
Now and then even a BLIND squirrel can find an acorn
0
F5- Pirates-Brewers Under 4.5, -125, (Kingham/Guerra)
Kingham looked impressive his first outing, and this will be the Brewers first experience with him. But, he is 26 years old with 7 years of minor league experience and has to be considered mature in a baseball sense. It can be trouble to face a guy like that and he may get through the Brewers order twice with no problems. Junior Guerra is blooming nicely but is scarcely noticed by most bettors, especially those that ignore pitching. The Brewers offense is very average and the Pirates have disappeared their last 4 games versus righty. The early part of this game should be a pitcher’s duel.
FG- Cardinals -105, (Quintana/Mikolas)
The Cubs are playing OK ball, but nothing impressive or intimidating and Quintana is off to a slow, shaky start, with only 2 quality starts in his first 5, both versus the Brewers, away then home; but the Brewers are not nearly the lefty hitting club the Cardinals are. I suppose some trend follower will tell us Quintana is 4-0 versus the Cardinals, 2 with the White Sox and 2 with the Cubs, but that was then, and this is now. Trends followed blindly can be very deceiving and disappointing.
Posted: an hour ago "Quote" Where does the starting pitcher Mikolas fit into your analysis? I think the cubs will do some damage.
Mikolas has delivered 3 of 5 quality starts and his skill nimbers are respectable. Now don't go thinking it takes a staff ace to beat the Cubs because it doesn't. These are not the 2016 Cubs, even if most of the names are the same, and I already pointed out that Quintana is not exactly a Messiah this year. Matchup offense strongly favors the Cards.
Now and then even a BLIND squirrel can find an acorn
0
Quote Originally Posted by KC_4_LIFE:
Posted: an hour ago "Quote" Where does the starting pitcher Mikolas fit into your analysis? I think the cubs will do some damage.
Mikolas has delivered 3 of 5 quality starts and his skill nimbers are respectable. Now don't go thinking it takes a staff ace to beat the Cubs because it doesn't. These are not the 2016 Cubs, even if most of the names are the same, and I already pointed out that Quintana is not exactly a Messiah this year. Matchup offense strongly favors the Cards.
Posted: an hour ago "Quote" Key which of the 3 plays are you more confident?
We are not going to go there anymore. Any play can win or lose. I fell for that question yesterday and of course the favorite pushed, while the dog romped home with a big win. Do not think favorites are stronger bets, because that is not why they are favorites. They are only favorites because the public favors them to win. That is the art of linemaking, not probability.
Play them all, play none of them, or pick and choose. Your money, your choice.
There is a darn good reason I flat play everything.
Now and then even a BLIND squirrel can find an acorn
0
Quote Originally Posted by Gizmoo:
Posted: an hour ago "Quote" Key which of the 3 plays are you more confident?
We are not going to go there anymore. Any play can win or lose. I fell for that question yesterday and of course the favorite pushed, while the dog romped home with a big win. Do not think favorites are stronger bets, because that is not why they are favorites. They are only favorites because the public favors them to win. That is the art of linemaking, not probability.
Play them all, play none of them, or pick and choose. Your money, your choice.
There is a darn good reason I flat play everything.
How can you bet - 1/2 point in baseball. I dont get it. In your example the yanks -.5 -140 for the Run Line and money line for this game is -180
$ .40 seems like a lot for the books to offer for 1/2 point but
why would the book make that bet available at all. ???
Your bet is effectively a money line bet since there are no ties in baseball. You basically have a money line bet at significantly less juice. Thats all anybody would bet if that really is available.
Maybe you meant -1 1/2 runs.
0
How can you bet - 1/2 point in baseball. I dont get it. In your example the yanks -.5 -140 for the Run Line and money line for this game is -180
$ .40 seems like a lot for the books to offer for 1/2 point but
why would the book make that bet available at all. ???
Your bet is effectively a money line bet since there are no ties in baseball. You basically have a money line bet at significantly less juice. Thats all anybody would bet if that really is available.
How can you bet - 1/2 point in baseball. I dont get it. In your example the yanks -.5 -140 for the Run Line and money line for this game is -180
$ .40 seems like a lot for the books to offer for 1/2 point but
why would the book make that bet available at all. ???
Your bet is effectively a money line bet since there are no ties in baseball. You basically have a money line bet at significantly less juice. Thats all anybody would bet if that really is available.
Maybe you meant -1 1/2 runs.
That is -.5 for the 1st half of the game (1st 5 innings) which an offering that virtually every book offers
0
Quote Originally Posted by archdriver:
How can you bet - 1/2 point in baseball. I dont get it. In your example the yanks -.5 -140 for the Run Line and money line for this game is -180
$ .40 seems like a lot for the books to offer for 1/2 point but
why would the book make that bet available at all. ???
Your bet is effectively a money line bet since there are no ties in baseball. You basically have a money line bet at significantly less juice. Thats all anybody would bet if that really is available.
Maybe you meant -1 1/2 runs.
That is -.5 for the 1st half of the game (1st 5 innings) which an offering that virtually every book offers
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.