I'm surprised you are not on the Pirates. Seems like a huge pitching gap between Tailon and Nelson. Plus the Brewers line up tonight is pretty punchless.
Too much Juice to take the ML with Fulmer over a converted reliever, or does the Sox beating up Fulmer last time out make you think he hit the wall?
IMHO that Pirates line is way too high. I don't necessarily think Fulmer has hit a wall, but his last outing was weak and Chacin had his best of the year. That is a truly ugly matchup. I have plenty of jack out there already, why push it? Some matchups that look easy to others are of no interest to me. BOL
Now and then even a BLIND squirrel can find an acorn
0
Quote Originally Posted by NaciremaDream:
I'm surprised you are not on the Pirates. Seems like a huge pitching gap between Tailon and Nelson. Plus the Brewers line up tonight is pretty punchless.
Too much Juice to take the ML with Fulmer over a converted reliever, or does the Sox beating up Fulmer last time out make you think he hit the wall?
IMHO that Pirates line is way too high. I don't necessarily think Fulmer has hit a wall, but his last outing was weak and Chacin had his best of the year. That is a truly ugly matchup. I have plenty of jack out there already, why push it? Some matchups that look easy to others are of no interest to me. BOL
Thanks for the tip about not picking home team favorite RLs. I've thought a lot about that since you posted it. I appreciate those tidbits!
Well please show your appreciation by taking back the commissioners job from Rob Manfred before we have nothing but slow pitch softball remaining. Juiced balls and a high strike zone are going to kill the game as we know it. Story, Seager, Sanchez, are all guys amazed at their home run power in the majors versus the minors, but we might not have seen nuthin yet. Starting pitcher era's are at their highest since the juice was taken from the players and injected into the balls.
Now and then even a BLIND squirrel can find an acorn
0
Quote Originally Posted by BudSelig:
Key,
Thanks for the tip about not picking home team favorite RLs. I've thought a lot about that since you posted it. I appreciate those tidbits!
Well please show your appreciation by taking back the commissioners job from Rob Manfred before we have nothing but slow pitch softball remaining. Juiced balls and a high strike zone are going to kill the game as we know it. Story, Seager, Sanchez, are all guys amazed at their home run power in the majors versus the minors, but we might not have seen nuthin yet. Starting pitcher era's are at their highest since the juice was taken from the players and injected into the balls.
Ladies and Gentlemen: Instead of arguing the merits of
jinxes, karma, and other superstitions, why not find a way to convince the
football/basketball -110 +/- pointsignoramuses
to explain how they can go 1-1 and have a 30.5% ROI in point spread wagering? 1-1 does not even break even at -110.
It is a -4.55%. We listen to the “win percent” crap all season and no one has
found a way to get them off it. Now it is late August and most have run back to
their beloved football without learning a thing, and will be back next spring
looking for handicappers that win 60% (of their games, the money is irrelevant).
Twins / Rockies, risk $480.00, profit $146.40, ROI = 30.5%
I realize Covers is not an educational institution, but at
some point you would think someone would learn something.
Key, just wanted to say thanks for all I've learned following you for the last one year plus. Wagering discipline, line value, team's tendencies against righties/lefties, quality start metrics, oera metrics, roi tracking, etc, etc. It's a whole science behind the scenes of the actual games being played. I realize you feel you don't get through to most, but know that some of us are leveraging your knowledge and appreciate it!
0
Quote Originally Posted by KeyElement:
Ladies and Gentlemen: Instead of arguing the merits of
jinxes, karma, and other superstitions, why not find a way to convince the
football/basketball -110 +/- pointsignoramuses
to explain how they can go 1-1 and have a 30.5% ROI in point spread wagering? 1-1 does not even break even at -110.
It is a -4.55%. We listen to the “win percent” crap all season and no one has
found a way to get them off it. Now it is late August and most have run back to
their beloved football without learning a thing, and will be back next spring
looking for handicappers that win 60% (of their games, the money is irrelevant).
Twins / Rockies, risk $480.00, profit $146.40, ROI = 30.5%
I realize Covers is not an educational institution, but at
some point you would think someone would learn something.
Key, just wanted to say thanks for all I've learned following you for the last one year plus. Wagering discipline, line value, team's tendencies against righties/lefties, quality start metrics, oera metrics, roi tracking, etc, etc. It's a whole science behind the scenes of the actual games being played. I realize you feel you don't get through to most, but know that some of us are leveraging your knowledge and appreciate it!
Key, just wanted to say thanks for all I've learned following you for the last one year plus. Wagering discipline, line value, team's tendencies against righties/lefties, quality start metrics, oera metrics, roi tracking, etc, etc. It's a whole science behind the scenes of the actual games being played. I realize you feel you don't get through to most, but know that some of us are leveraging your knowledge and appreciate it!
It is done for people lie you. Much appreciated.
Now and then even a BLIND squirrel can find an acorn
0
Quote Originally Posted by SlowCurve20:
Key, just wanted to say thanks for all I've learned following you for the last one year plus. Wagering discipline, line value, team's tendencies against righties/lefties, quality start metrics, oera metrics, roi tracking, etc, etc. It's a whole science behind the scenes of the actual games being played. I realize you feel you don't get through to most, but know that some of us are leveraging your knowledge and appreciate it!
Ladies and Gentlemen: Instead of arguing the merits of
jinxes, karma, and other superstitions, why not find a way to convince the
football/basketball -110 +/- pointsignoramuses
to explain how they can go 1-1 and have a 30.5% ROI in point spread wagering? 1-1 does not even break even at -110.
It is a -4.55%. We listen to the “win percent” crap all season and no one has
found a way to get them off it. Now it is late August and most have run back to
their beloved football without learning a thing, and will be back next spring
looking for handicappers that win 60% (of their games, yet the money is irrelevant).
Twins / Rockies, risk $480.00, profit $146.40, ROI = 30.5%
I realize Covers is not an educational institution, but at
some point you would think someone would learn something.
0
Quote Originally Posted by KeyElement:
Ladies and Gentlemen: Instead of arguing the merits of
jinxes, karma, and other superstitions, why not find a way to convince the
football/basketball -110 +/- pointsignoramuses
to explain how they can go 1-1 and have a 30.5% ROI in point spread wagering? 1-1 does not even break even at -110.
It is a -4.55%. We listen to the “win percent” crap all season and no one has
found a way to get them off it. Now it is late August and most have run back to
their beloved football without learning a thing, and will be back next spring
looking for handicappers that win 60% (of their games, yet the money is irrelevant).
Twins / Rockies, risk $480.00, profit $146.40, ROI = 30.5%
I realize Covers is not an educational institution, but at
some point you would think someone would learn something.
Copyright � 1995 - 2024
CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Hot Forum Topics
