Quote Originally Posted by undermysac:
Absolutely Wiseguy
The game is changing exponentially, especially how it's being analyzed. For me personally, I've been resorting to the best tool anyone can use. And that's their eyes, they don't lie.
The one thing the analytic nerds are using that I'm pissing on lately is their use of "x" or "expected" They don't know the game, they know stats and make guesses. I'll make my own and live with it.
All though it's hard to watch a lot of baseball these days, one has limited time in today's world.
Sac , Thank you for this as you have so eloquently stated the
points that I was trying to make.
The first statment is incredibly important to ones ability to quantify
a matchup and accurately determine the likelihood of a result.
Unfortunately, many who wager lack this skill and rely on stats
as a substitute for this skill. All stats are backward looking and
unless one knows how ( and what ) stats can be effectively as a
predictor for future matchups , their odds of success on a wager
are not good , or certainly not improved unless they what the
stats are trying to tell them. Stats will never be able to quantify
any players motivation on any given night , but they may be able
to tell a bettor which teams to avoid wagering on.
The second point is great because most who wager think looking
at stats and the use of analytics are the same thing . They are
not. You are correct in your statement that most bettors " look at
stats and make guesses "..That is not what the effective use of
analytics is about. Analytics used properly provide an effective
way to diagnose an element in any process ( in this case to
predict the outcome of a sporting event ) , identify the parameters
necessary to accurately predict an outcome ,and to provide the
probability that the assessment is a correct one. Most have no
idea how to do this , so guessing will have to suffice for them.
sac , Well said , Bud
Helping Kama'aina to beat their " Local " since 1994.