Are you kidding... I have this thread right where I want it !!!!
PITTSBURGH +161
WBA- Nobody seemed to care much about the pic of the day...Wish I could have got some more talk out of it. Maybe if I would have started on a seperate thread.... Oh well !!!
keep up the good work ...
I noticed it a few times but am unsure what It is about. Is it a consensus pick or the top picks or what? When I have time I do the same thing, ranking each with a value. It gets varying results. If anyone has ever taken the time to review results from the covers consensus it will give some unexpected results. For instance the Top 10% will actually LOSE more frequently than the general conc. That seems to go against logic but when you really look at why it makes sense, the Top10% is the current Top 10% of that day not a consistant group from say last season, so the slight majority has no were to go but down and is replaced by new members. I believe this is a similar phenominon here. So my view would be to follow previous winners and or top players after a loss or two. Just some observations I have crunched on spreadsheet. Any thoughts?
0
Quote Originally Posted by Chaps04:
Chaps04 11-16-1 -725
*** Wow you needed that win yesterday!***
Are you kidding... I have this thread right where I want it !!!!
PITTSBURGH +161
WBA- Nobody seemed to care much about the pic of the day...Wish I could have got some more talk out of it. Maybe if I would have started on a seperate thread.... Oh well !!!
keep up the good work ...
I noticed it a few times but am unsure what It is about. Is it a consensus pick or the top picks or what? When I have time I do the same thing, ranking each with a value. It gets varying results. If anyone has ever taken the time to review results from the covers consensus it will give some unexpected results. For instance the Top 10% will actually LOSE more frequently than the general conc. That seems to go against logic but when you really look at why it makes sense, the Top10% is the current Top 10% of that day not a consistant group from say last season, so the slight majority has no were to go but down and is replaced by new members. I believe this is a similar phenominon here. So my view would be to follow previous winners and or top players after a loss or two. Just some observations I have crunched on spreadsheet. Any thoughts?
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.