Sunday: 3-1, +3.15
Monday:
Kansas City Royals -110 ML
Arizona Diamondbacks +110 ML
Parlay: Astros ML / Dodgers -1 RL (+120)
MLB Running Record:
238-195, +31.85 Units
Sunday: 3-1, +3.15
Monday:
Kansas City Royals -110 ML
Arizona Diamondbacks +110 ML
Parlay: Astros ML / Dodgers -1 RL (+120)
MLB Running Record:
238-195, +31.85 Units
Sunday: 3-1, +3.15
Monday:
Kansas City Royals -110 ML
Arizona Diamondbacks +110 ML
Parlay: Astros ML / Dodgers -1 RL (+120)
MLB Running Record:
238-195, +31.85 Units
Wrote these down for my leans…. Syndergaard and Junis both are on my sharp tease list.
Your getting hot again big bro. Might finalize them just because of you.
Wrote these down for my leans…. Syndergaard and Junis both are on my sharp tease list.
Your getting hot again big bro. Might finalize them just because of you.
Same here. Royals in great form right now, and the Giants have looked awful
Same here. Royals in great form right now, and the Giants have looked awful
Strictly a FADE on the Giants.
I like the Dbacks lineup better
The Giants Bullpen stinks
The Giants are hitting .187 with an OPS of .577 over their last 7 games.
Dbacks are hitting .317 with an OPS of .856 over their last 7 games.
The Giants didn’t play well in their last series down in Arizona, they’re 22-25 on the road, and Arizona is much better at home.
Strictly a FADE on the Giants.
I like the Dbacks lineup better
The Giants Bullpen stinks
The Giants are hitting .187 with an OPS of .577 over their last 7 games.
Dbacks are hitting .317 with an OPS of .856 over their last 7 games.
The Giants didn’t play well in their last series down in Arizona, they’re 22-25 on the road, and Arizona is much better at home.
ADDING the Orioles
Monday:
Baltimore Orioles +110 ML
Kansas City Royals -110 ML
Arizona Diamondbacks +110 ML
Parlay: Astros ML / Dodgers -1 RL (+120)
ADDING the Orioles
Monday:
Baltimore Orioles +110 ML
Kansas City Royals -110 ML
Arizona Diamondbacks +110 ML
Parlay: Astros ML / Dodgers -1 RL (+120)
ADDING a parlay in the Cubs game.
Monday:
Baltimore Orioles +110 ML
Kansas City Royals -110 ML
Arizona Diamondbacks +110 ML
Parlay: Cubs ML / Pirates tt U 4.5 (+100)
Parlay: Astros ML / Dodgers -1 RL (+120)
ADDING a parlay in the Cubs game.
Monday:
Baltimore Orioles +110 ML
Kansas City Royals -110 ML
Arizona Diamondbacks +110 ML
Parlay: Cubs ML / Pirates tt U 4.5 (+100)
Parlay: Astros ML / Dodgers -1 RL (+120)
@Riggs-MLB-Picks
I never look at anyone's plays until after I click "CONFIRM" and when I do that might be hours or next day but I'll have to make sure I check your plays first before I click "CONFIRM SINGLE BET"
Seen your Parlay: NYY -0.5 F5 / MIN -0.5 F5 last night going through threads
Had I seen that and out of respect for your awesome capping, no way I would have played opposite with high $$$ dogs.
Worse still is that it's rare that I even look at any sides with a -150 ML or more, usually automatic toss outs and the few that I have swayed to I've lost with either playing on or against.
Great capping Riggs CHEERS
@Riggs-MLB-Picks
I never look at anyone's plays until after I click "CONFIRM" and when I do that might be hours or next day but I'll have to make sure I check your plays first before I click "CONFIRM SINGLE BET"
Seen your Parlay: NYY -0.5 F5 / MIN -0.5 F5 last night going through threads
Had I seen that and out of respect for your awesome capping, no way I would have played opposite with high $$$ dogs.
Worse still is that it's rare that I even look at any sides with a -150 ML or more, usually automatic toss outs and the few that I have swayed to I've lost with either playing on or against.
Great capping Riggs CHEERS
Yep, that’s the thing bro.
I have gotten in so many arguments over Line Premium with people who say that “the line doesn’t matter as long as you WIN.”
I strongly DISAGREE with that. Especially in a grind of a season like baseball.
Even if I LOVE a game, but hate the Line, I always find another way to play it, put it in a 2-team parlay, or SKIP it all together.
One thing I’ve been experimenting with lately is the No Run 1st inning, or TT Unders on teams that I’m fading… parlaying it with F5 or ML to get a better Line.
Yep, that’s the thing bro.
I have gotten in so many arguments over Line Premium with people who say that “the line doesn’t matter as long as you WIN.”
I strongly DISAGREE with that. Especially in a grind of a season like baseball.
Even if I LOVE a game, but hate the Line, I always find another way to play it, put it in a 2-team parlay, or SKIP it all together.
One thing I’ve been experimenting with lately is the No Run 1st inning, or TT Unders on teams that I’m fading… parlaying it with F5 or ML to get a better Line.
@Riggs-MLB-Picks
MLB, NHL ML games, definitely no argument from me, totally AGREE.
MLB is my "get me through the summer" entertainment but I do exactly the same as I do when NHL rolls around. I eliminate all games that have over a -150. After I go through the games that fit my rule I sometimes sway away (in MLB only, NHL, no swaying away) and look at the other games over -150 for maybe a game total, or a TT, 1st 5, etc and for the extra action and by swaying over to the above -150 games for the extra action it's cost me a few times this season and I should know better.
EXAMPLE: Atlanta -2' -104 on RL against Washington, lost outright 3-7.
Played -2' because they should have blown Washington out of the stadium and I didn't want to pay higher juice for the -1' I had the game scratched off then went looking for the extra action which again, I should know better as I've paid for my education over the decades of playing and should know better not to go against my personal rules or not to force something just to have the extra action. It all adds up to expensive losses, like Sunday's Tigers and Orioles F5 losses. Only liked 3 games, went 2-1 +132 but went looking for extra and it cost me -200. Even if one or both hit, bottom line I went against my rules.
It's rare that I ever play RL's or parlays and because for me personally, in the long run they've always been a losing proposition.
I try to get away from laying any juice what so ever and with totals if I like a game to go over say 8' minus $$$ I'll confirm it at 9 or 9' for plus $$$. Same way with under.
Betting to win or risk comes into play as well when “the line doesn’t matter as long as you WIN.”
One can have over a 52% ML/NHL win record but "The measure of success of a sports handicapper is not his percentage of winning bets, but the relative amount of profit he made over any given period of time." -- JV Miller
Best to you Riggs, keep up the awesome capping.
@Riggs-MLB-Picks
MLB, NHL ML games, definitely no argument from me, totally AGREE.
MLB is my "get me through the summer" entertainment but I do exactly the same as I do when NHL rolls around. I eliminate all games that have over a -150. After I go through the games that fit my rule I sometimes sway away (in MLB only, NHL, no swaying away) and look at the other games over -150 for maybe a game total, or a TT, 1st 5, etc and for the extra action and by swaying over to the above -150 games for the extra action it's cost me a few times this season and I should know better.
EXAMPLE: Atlanta -2' -104 on RL against Washington, lost outright 3-7.
Played -2' because they should have blown Washington out of the stadium and I didn't want to pay higher juice for the -1' I had the game scratched off then went looking for the extra action which again, I should know better as I've paid for my education over the decades of playing and should know better not to go against my personal rules or not to force something just to have the extra action. It all adds up to expensive losses, like Sunday's Tigers and Orioles F5 losses. Only liked 3 games, went 2-1 +132 but went looking for extra and it cost me -200. Even if one or both hit, bottom line I went against my rules.
It's rare that I ever play RL's or parlays and because for me personally, in the long run they've always been a losing proposition.
I try to get away from laying any juice what so ever and with totals if I like a game to go over say 8' minus $$$ I'll confirm it at 9 or 9' for plus $$$. Same way with under.
Betting to win or risk comes into play as well when “the line doesn’t matter as long as you WIN.”
One can have over a 52% ML/NHL win record but "The measure of success of a sports handicapper is not his percentage of winning bets, but the relative amount of profit he made over any given period of time." -- JV Miller
Best to you Riggs, keep up the awesome capping.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.