No addressing the salient points, just down nosing an opposing opinion irrelevant of its substance.
You brought up the anomalous nature of the Athletics performance against the dominant Darvish, but fail to address the possibility of Darvish underperforming relative to himself.
There are so many variables to examine within the Darvish vs. Athletics performance that I can assert you don't have the resources to identify the "why". I took issue with you grandiose statement about anomalies that is clearly erroneous.
Keep up the obstinate attitude and the large lexicon. No one questions if you sound intelligent.
0
Standard operating procedure, key.
No addressing the salient points, just down nosing an opposing opinion irrelevant of its substance.
You brought up the anomalous nature of the Athletics performance against the dominant Darvish, but fail to address the possibility of Darvish underperforming relative to himself.
There are so many variables to examine within the Darvish vs. Athletics performance that I can assert you don't have the resources to identify the "why". I took issue with you grandiose statement about anomalies that is clearly erroneous.
Keep up the obstinate attitude and the large lexicon. No one questions if you sound intelligent.
No addressing the salient points, just down nosing an opposing opinion irrelevant of its substance.
You brought up the anomalous nature of the Athletics performance against the dominant Darvish, but fail to address the possibility of Darvish underperforming relative to himself.
There are so many variables to examine within the Darvish vs. Athletics performance that I can assert you don't have the resources to identify the "why". I took issue with you grandiose statement about anomalies that is clearly erroneous.
Keep up the obstinate attitude and the large lexicon. No one questions if you sound intelligent.
Boy do you sound learned, all that there fancy talkin and all....
I was a loyal viewer of the sty there for a minute but the commandments of don't talk about the losses and unless your a founding forefather don't chime in unless we deem you worthy bullshiet ruined what was a decent thread. Take your arrogance back to your little pigpen and go stroke your little buddies. What few are left.
It's his thread if you don't like it go back and play with your own ball. I could only imagine someone coming into the well protected sty and questioning someone's pick. Some win, some lose he has his own beliefs and reasoning for his picks. Like or leave it. Your purtty mouf with them ther fancy smancy words don't impress not one nan nada round here.
Sorry key for flaming in your thread. Your one of the few on this site worth viewing and I have watched them blow up on many in the sacred sty for far less then a losing pick. Enjoy your thread! Keep up the great work.
0
Quote Originally Posted by henrymethbreath:
Standard operating procedure, key.
No addressing the salient points, just down nosing an opposing opinion irrelevant of its substance.
You brought up the anomalous nature of the Athletics performance against the dominant Darvish, but fail to address the possibility of Darvish underperforming relative to himself.
There are so many variables to examine within the Darvish vs. Athletics performance that I can assert you don't have the resources to identify the "why". I took issue with you grandiose statement about anomalies that is clearly erroneous.
Keep up the obstinate attitude and the large lexicon. No one questions if you sound intelligent.
Boy do you sound learned, all that there fancy talkin and all....
I was a loyal viewer of the sty there for a minute but the commandments of don't talk about the losses and unless your a founding forefather don't chime in unless we deem you worthy bullshiet ruined what was a decent thread. Take your arrogance back to your little pigpen and go stroke your little buddies. What few are left.
It's his thread if you don't like it go back and play with your own ball. I could only imagine someone coming into the well protected sty and questioning someone's pick. Some win, some lose he has his own beliefs and reasoning for his picks. Like or leave it. Your purtty mouf with them ther fancy smancy words don't impress not one nan nada round here.
Sorry key for flaming in your thread. Your one of the few on this site worth viewing and I have watched them blow up on many in the sacred sty for far less then a losing pick. Enjoy your thread! Keep up the great work.
Boy do you sound learned, all that there fancy talkin and all....
I was a loyal viewer of the sty there for a minute but the commandments of don't talk about the losses and unless your a founding forefather don't chime in unless we deem you worthy bullshiet ruined what was a decent thread. Take your arrogance back to your little pigpen and go stroke your little buddies. What few are left.
It's his thread if you don't like it go back and play with your own ball. I could only imagine someone coming into the well protected sty and questioning someone's pick. Some win, some lose he has his own beliefs and reasoning for his picks. Like or leave it. Your purtty mouf with them ther fancy smancy words don't impress not one nan nada round here.
Sorry key for flaming in your thread. Your one of the few on this site worth viewing and I have watched them blow up on many in the sacred sty for far less then a losing pick. Enjoy your thread! Keep up the great work.
i was seriously asking key what tangible stats he is using to justify a pitcher who is 1-7, now 1-8.
He called it anomalous in a grandiose statement, with the next sentence implying that the mathematics work for rangers bettors, saying the others side will meet a macabre ending.
I enjoy reading this thread, but softballs like that are for the birds.
You indicting the sty and throwing personal crap about me being learned is the exact point of what you posted.
Cheers, lucky and key.
0
Quote Originally Posted by 1TimeLucky1:
Boy do you sound learned, all that there fancy talkin and all....
I was a loyal viewer of the sty there for a minute but the commandments of don't talk about the losses and unless your a founding forefather don't chime in unless we deem you worthy bullshiet ruined what was a decent thread. Take your arrogance back to your little pigpen and go stroke your little buddies. What few are left.
It's his thread if you don't like it go back and play with your own ball. I could only imagine someone coming into the well protected sty and questioning someone's pick. Some win, some lose he has his own beliefs and reasoning for his picks. Like or leave it. Your purtty mouf with them ther fancy smancy words don't impress not one nan nada round here.
Sorry key for flaming in your thread. Your one of the few on this site worth viewing and I have watched them blow up on many in the sacred sty for far less then a losing pick. Enjoy your thread! Keep up the great work.
i was seriously asking key what tangible stats he is using to justify a pitcher who is 1-7, now 1-8.
He called it anomalous in a grandiose statement, with the next sentence implying that the mathematics work for rangers bettors, saying the others side will meet a macabre ending.
I enjoy reading this thread, but softballs like that are for the birds.
You indicting the sty and throwing personal crap about me being learned is the exact point of what you posted.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Hot Forum Topics
