If you have never read my wagering strategy I encourage you to do so. Whether or not you adopt is it your choice.
MLB 2012 Regular Season: 363-369 +245.87 Units 6.72% ROI
MLB 2012 Playoffs: 12-9-3 +10.29 Units 14.6% ROI
MLB 2012 @ 1 unit per play = +51.23 Net Units
6.03.2013, 0-1, -5 Units, -100% ROI
YTD – 121-125-24, +49.31 Units, +4.05% ROI
5 & 9 Innings – ALWAYS Specify Pitchers – NO action plays
All plays are 5 Units Flat, unless otherwise noted
Today’s comment: Breaks are what they are. Sometimes you get them, sometimes you don’t. Kendrick won that pitching duel with Koehler last night but partially because he contributed offensively himself. When handicapping there is just no way to allow for a pitcher getting the first triple of his career and driving in a run, then becoming an rbi stat himself. S**t happens, we persevere, we push on.
Now and then even a BLIND squirrel can find an acorn
If you have never read my wagering strategy I encourage you to do so. Whether or not you adopt is it your choice.
MLB 2012 Regular Season: 363-369 +245.87 Units 6.72% ROI
MLB 2012 Playoffs: 12-9-3 +10.29 Units 14.6% ROI
MLB 2012 @ 1 unit per play = +51.23 Net Units
6.03.2013, 0-1, -5 Units, -100% ROI
YTD – 121-125-24, +49.31 Units, +4.05% ROI
5 & 9 Innings – ALWAYS Specify Pitchers – NO action plays
All plays are 5 Units Flat, unless otherwise noted
Today’s comment: Breaks are what they are. Sometimes you get them, sometimes you don’t. Kendrick won that pitching duel with Koehler last night but partially because he contributed offensively himself. When handicapping there is just no way to allow for a pitcher getting the first triple of his career and driving in a run, then becoming an rbi stat himself. S**t happens, we persevere, we push on.
Unless Pettibone triples (lol) Nolasco is the better side of this matchup. Per my system I have Nolasco with 7 quality starts in 12 appearances, versus 5 of 8 for Pettibone, but Pettibone has not faced the quality of opposition that Nolasco has and the offensive potential of either team is remarkably close tonight. All of that says that the Phillies probably should be favored, but not by an amount that requires a 63% win probability before you start looking at a positive EV.
Indians F5 (+130) (Kazmir / Phelps)
A couple months ago I would have sworn the day would never come when I would pass on Masterson and take Kazmir the next, but that is just an example of what a funny game baseball really is. In my way of doing things there is no “fade this pitcher” or “fade this team”, nor is there very often a chance to “ride” either a pitcher or team. Today is the only future I am wagering on and the probability of winning performance today is the only probability that matters. I don’t have Kazmir highly rated, but he is just as good as Phelps and the Indians hit righties far better than the Yankees hit lefties. There is also the aspect of Yankee Stadium (old and new both) slightly favoring left handed pitchers and tonight’s slight wind across from left to right should or could enhance that. ‘nuff said.
Diamondbacks F5 (+140) (Skaggs / Wacha)
OK, it looks like the Cardinals are laying waste to everything in sight, right? To an extent that is true, and what is true is what makes the Cardinals the best team in MLB at this point and could give us a runaway winner in the regular season and playoffs if it continues. There are two aspects that playoff qualifiers almost always share. Win on the road, and beat right handed pitching. Obviously at 20-9 winning on the road is no problem, nor is 31-13 versus righty a problem, but a hot newcomer lefty is a different challenge. The Cardinals are only 7-6 versus lefty overall and 6-6-1 in the 5 inning game. According to my formula the Cardinals offensive rating drops from righty to lefty 38 / 32.4, and their offensive era drops from 6.3 per nine innings to 3.5. That is a huge difference when you also consider the fact the Cardinals have never faced Tyler Skaggs.
Now and then even a BLIND squirrel can find an acorn
0
Marlins F5 (+155) (Nolasco / Pettibone)
Unless Pettibone triples (lol) Nolasco is the better side of this matchup. Per my system I have Nolasco with 7 quality starts in 12 appearances, versus 5 of 8 for Pettibone, but Pettibone has not faced the quality of opposition that Nolasco has and the offensive potential of either team is remarkably close tonight. All of that says that the Phillies probably should be favored, but not by an amount that requires a 63% win probability before you start looking at a positive EV.
Indians F5 (+130) (Kazmir / Phelps)
A couple months ago I would have sworn the day would never come when I would pass on Masterson and take Kazmir the next, but that is just an example of what a funny game baseball really is. In my way of doing things there is no “fade this pitcher” or “fade this team”, nor is there very often a chance to “ride” either a pitcher or team. Today is the only future I am wagering on and the probability of winning performance today is the only probability that matters. I don’t have Kazmir highly rated, but he is just as good as Phelps and the Indians hit righties far better than the Yankees hit lefties. There is also the aspect of Yankee Stadium (old and new both) slightly favoring left handed pitchers and tonight’s slight wind across from left to right should or could enhance that. ‘nuff said.
Diamondbacks F5 (+140) (Skaggs / Wacha)
OK, it looks like the Cardinals are laying waste to everything in sight, right? To an extent that is true, and what is true is what makes the Cardinals the best team in MLB at this point and could give us a runaway winner in the regular season and playoffs if it continues. There are two aspects that playoff qualifiers almost always share. Win on the road, and beat right handed pitching. Obviously at 20-9 winning on the road is no problem, nor is 31-13 versus righty a problem, but a hot newcomer lefty is a different challenge. The Cardinals are only 7-6 versus lefty overall and 6-6-1 in the 5 inning game. According to my formula the Cardinals offensive rating drops from righty to lefty 38 / 32.4, and their offensive era drops from 6.3 per nine innings to 3.5. That is a huge difference when you also consider the fact the Cardinals have never faced Tyler Skaggs.
Dont trust Nolasco or Miami however last 2 look great...Gl as,always
I can more easily trust Nolasco for 155 cents on the dollar than Pettibone for 61. I think 2.54 x the potential payback is worthy, but, it is always your money, your choice.
Now and then even a BLIND squirrel can find an acorn
0
Quote Originally Posted by Frank the Bank:
Dont trust Nolasco or Miami however last 2 look great...Gl as,always
I can more easily trust Nolasco for 155 cents on the dollar than Pettibone for 61. I think 2.54 x the potential payback is worthy, but, it is always your money, your choice.
As much as Colorodo pissed,me off yesterday how do you like their value today at plus 150
The +150 works Frank. What does not work is that I grant small, but not insignificant, edges to the Reds in pitching, offensive rating, run production, and strength of schedule. All four small edges gain a momentum of their own, very hard to quantify, but basically the whole is greater than the sum of its parts. So although I show the Rockies with a 44.6% probability of a win, and that easily covers the 40% required by +150, I still do not like the play.
BTW, why be pissed off at any team? It just tends to warp your judgment in the future. It is gambling and we do not win them all and we accept that going in.
Now and then even a BLIND squirrel can find an acorn
0
Quote Originally Posted by Frank the Bank:
As much as Colorodo pissed,me off yesterday how do you like their value today at plus 150
The +150 works Frank. What does not work is that I grant small, but not insignificant, edges to the Reds in pitching, offensive rating, run production, and strength of schedule. All four small edges gain a momentum of their own, very hard to quantify, but basically the whole is greater than the sum of its parts. So although I show the Rockies with a 44.6% probability of a win, and that easily covers the 40% required by +150, I still do not like the play.
BTW, why be pissed off at any team? It just tends to warp your judgment in the future. It is gambling and we do not win them all and we accept that going in.
The greatest thing about Covers is that very few people actually care what is written or should be considered. After all, 99% of the viewers already know everything about sports and sports gambling, so the books will always have the funds available to pay me (us).
Now and then even a BLIND squirrel can find an acorn
0
Quote Originally Posted by The-OG-GunClapa:
Best MLB write ups on covers bud
As always thanks for sharing
The greatest thing about Covers is that very few people actually care what is written or should be considered. After all, 99% of the viewers already know everything about sports and sports gambling, so the books will always have the funds available to pay me (us).
BTW, why be pissed off at any team? It just tends to warp your judgment in the future. It is gambling and we do not win them all and we accept that going in.
Great point, couldnt agree with you more. This is definetly a marathon. Hey, just a question, seen this abbreviation on this site more then once, what does ROI stand for?
GL on your picks. Thinking about taking Arizona myself. Im against you on the other two for the full game, but BOL.
0
Quote Originally Posted by KeyElement:
BTW, why be pissed off at any team? It just tends to warp your judgment in the future. It is gambling and we do not win them all and we accept that going in.
Great point, couldnt agree with you more. This is definetly a marathon. Hey, just a question, seen this abbreviation on this site more then once, what does ROI stand for?
GL on your picks. Thinking about taking Arizona myself. Im against you on the other two for the full game, but BOL.
Great point, couldnt agree with you more. This is definetly a marathon. Hey, just a question, seen this abbreviation on this site more then once, what does ROI stand for?
GL on your picks. Thinking about taking Arizona myself. Im against you on the other two for the full game, but BOL.
ROI is Return On Investment. Very important in baseball, where you can hit 60% and lose money or hit 40% and make money. The link to my blog on the subject is at the top of the page, but basically it amounts to what is the return on your dollar of investment? The dog is easy: a dog quoted at +140 is making 140 cents per dollar if it wins (1 x 140), but the opposite side is the favorite at -150. That favorite is making only 66.67 cents per dollar of investment (risk) if it wins. Now, if one divides the potential profit of the dog, 140 by the potential profit of the favorite, he sees that the profit on the dog is potentially 2.1 times the profit on the favorite in a risk/reward comparison. The question then becomes, is the favorite really worth the risk?
Now and then even a BLIND squirrel can find an acorn
0
Quote Originally Posted by Bloodshot13:
Great point, couldnt agree with you more. This is definetly a marathon. Hey, just a question, seen this abbreviation on this site more then once, what does ROI stand for?
GL on your picks. Thinking about taking Arizona myself. Im against you on the other two for the full game, but BOL.
ROI is Return On Investment. Very important in baseball, where you can hit 60% and lose money or hit 40% and make money. The link to my blog on the subject is at the top of the page, but basically it amounts to what is the return on your dollar of investment? The dog is easy: a dog quoted at +140 is making 140 cents per dollar if it wins (1 x 140), but the opposite side is the favorite at -150. That favorite is making only 66.67 cents per dollar of investment (risk) if it wins. Now, if one divides the potential profit of the dog, 140 by the potential profit of the favorite, he sees that the profit on the dog is potentially 2.1 times the profit on the favorite in a risk/reward comparison. The question then becomes, is the favorite really worth the risk?
run support for ricky nolasco has been far a paltry 2.2 runs a game, that doesn't worry you at all?
Run support for a given pitcher is irrelevant. Teams do not score because of who is pitching for them, but because of who is pitching for the opponent. Every team would like to score 10 runs every game for their own pitcher, but that is up to the guy they are going against, not the pitcher himself. Tonight's probability, pitcher versus opposing offense, tells me the Marlins are just as likely to score versus Pettibone as the Phillies are versus Nolasco.
Now and then even a BLIND squirrel can find an acorn
0
Quote Originally Posted by slowphenomenon:
run support for ricky nolasco has been far a paltry 2.2 runs a game, that doesn't worry you at all?
Run support for a given pitcher is irrelevant. Teams do not score because of who is pitching for them, but because of who is pitching for the opponent. Every team would like to score 10 runs every game for their own pitcher, but that is up to the guy they are going against, not the pitcher himself. Tonight's probability, pitcher versus opposing offense, tells me the Marlins are just as likely to score versus Pettibone as the Phillies are versus Nolasco.
Very true statement on the Cardinals and I've been staying off them entirely when going against a lefty, even faded them against Jorge De La Rosa. Very nice write ups, suprised I've never seen your threads before. GL man.
0
Very true statement on the Cardinals and I've been staying off them entirely when going against a lefty, even faded them against Jorge De La Rosa. Very nice write ups, suprised I've never seen your threads before. GL man.
Very true statement on the Cardinals and I've been staying off them entirely when going against a lefty, even faded them against Jorge De La Rosa. Very nice write ups, suprised I've never seen your threads before. GL man.
You have to look early or go back a couple pages. After some of the East Coast guys get home from work and start to load the forum with garbage some of the better posters are pushed far off page one. BOL
Now and then even a BLIND squirrel can find an acorn
0
Quote Originally Posted by TheForbes777:
Very true statement on the Cardinals and I've been staying off them entirely when going against a lefty, even faded them against Jorge De La Rosa. Very nice write ups, suprised I've never seen your threads before. GL man.
You have to look early or go back a couple pages. After some of the East Coast guys get home from work and start to load the forum with garbage some of the better posters are pushed far off page one. BOL
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.