Key, Am I mistaken when I think I followed your picks 8 or 9 yrs. ago on another forum. If so, why did you quit that forum.
I am going to pass on any more plays but may regret it in the morning. The Red Sox laying -173 with Koehler versus Porcello is ludicrous. Rick Porcello and the BoSox having a 63.4% or better chance of beating anyone is ludicrous.
I am going to pass on any more plays but may regret it in the morning. The Red Sox laying -173 with Koehler versus Porcello is ludicrous. Rick Porcello and the BoSox having a 63.4% or better chance of beating anyone is ludicrous.
I am going to pass on any more plays but may regret it in the morning. The Red Sox laying -173 with Koehler versus Porcello is ludicrous. Rick Porcello and the BoSox having a 63.4% or better chance of beating anyone is ludicrous.
I am going to pass on any more plays but may regret it in the morning. The Red Sox laying -173 with Koehler versus Porcello is ludicrous. Rick Porcello and the BoSox having a 63.4% or better chance of beating anyone is ludicrous.
JEG, the problem with the field is, as you say, too many scammers that give even the good ones a bad reputation. There are qualified people doing tout work but thanks to the overall perception they find it difficult to make a decent living that way and have to go find new customers every time they encounter a bad or unlucky streak and the old ones bail out, calling them "scammer" whether it is true or not. All that glitters is not gold and selling picks is not necessarily the easiest way in the world to earn a living, competent or not. There was even a guy here a few years ago that said "a professional gambler should make money every day." That is ridiculous, it is simply not the nature of the beast. So anyway, I guess we will let the rich kid or bookie or whatever he is keep his $5K. It pains me to pay you a compliment but thanx for your wise counsel.
JEG, the problem with the field is, as you say, too many scammers that give even the good ones a bad reputation. There are qualified people doing tout work but thanks to the overall perception they find it difficult to make a decent living that way and have to go find new customers every time they encounter a bad or unlucky streak and the old ones bail out, calling them "scammer" whether it is true or not. All that glitters is not gold and selling picks is not necessarily the easiest way in the world to earn a living, competent or not. There was even a guy here a few years ago that said "a professional gambler should make money every day." That is ridiculous, it is simply not the nature of the beast. So anyway, I guess we will let the rich kid or bookie or whatever he is keep his $5K. It pains me to pay you a compliment but thanx for your wise counsel.
Return on risk is the great equalizer.
Return on risk is the great equalizer.
I am going to pass on any more plays but may regret it in the morning. The Red Sox laying -173 with Koehler versus Porcello is ludicrous. Rick Porcello and the BoSox having a 63.4% or better chance of beating anyone is ludicrous.
I am going to pass on any more plays but may regret it in the morning. The Red Sox laying -173 with Koehler versus Porcello is ludicrous. Rick Porcello and the BoSox having a 63.4% or better chance of beating anyone is ludicrous.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.