I would not get too focused on Atlanta's terrible bullpen as the majority of those guys aren't currently with the team. Since adding Frasor and Detwiller the BP has looked better. Don't focus on season stats with BP. It's misleading on what the current state is with the Pen.
Good shitt bud. Thx for responding..
0
Quote Originally Posted by erdoc:
I would not get too focused on Atlanta's terrible bullpen as the majority of those guys aren't currently with the team. Since adding Frasor and Detwiller the BP has looked better. Don't focus on season stats with BP. It's misleading on what the current state is with the Pen.
My friend, since leaving the armpit on the Erie Kazmir has been what he was meant to be. Do you still hold the same opinion of Max Scherzer you held when he was in Arizona?
Key I am puzzled by the Sherzer reference. He went from Zona to the other armpit on the Erie, Detroit.
0
Quote Originally Posted by KeyElement:
My friend, since leaving the armpit on the Erie Kazmir has been what he was meant to be. Do you still hold the same opinion of Max Scherzer you held when he was in Arizona?
Key I am puzzled by the Sherzer reference. He went from Zona to the other armpit on the Erie, Detroit.
I think there is more value in Braves RL at -130 considering Cards have had 36 1 run games and Bravo's 32 1 run games this year, agree though Clooney doesn't warrant this price, probably books fishing for Square play with St Louis. GL on your play.
So, the Braves have played 33.7% of their games within 1 run. Deduct 18 outright wins and +1.5 would have saved them in only 14 of their overall 95 games. Any result other than a 1 run win by the Cardinals costs you either either return on risk or the total wagered amount, regardless of what it is. -130 pays 77 cents on the dollar, but if you feel the +1.5 is worth
over 50% of the potential profit, well, it's always your money, your
choice. Personally, just speaking for myself, I hate the +1.5 run line. It seems to be extremely expensive insurance that only pays off under 1 specific condition, the favorite winning by exactly 1 run. BOL
Now and then even a BLIND squirrel can find an acorn
0
Quote Originally Posted by BarneysDad:
I think there is more value in Braves RL at -130 considering Cards have had 36 1 run games and Bravo's 32 1 run games this year, agree though Clooney doesn't warrant this price, probably books fishing for Square play with St Louis. GL on your play.
So, the Braves have played 33.7% of their games within 1 run. Deduct 18 outright wins and +1.5 would have saved them in only 14 of their overall 95 games. Any result other than a 1 run win by the Cardinals costs you either either return on risk or the total wagered amount, regardless of what it is. -130 pays 77 cents on the dollar, but if you feel the +1.5 is worth
over 50% of the potential profit, well, it's always your money, your
choice. Personally, just speaking for myself, I hate the +1.5 run line. It seems to be extremely expensive insurance that only pays off under 1 specific condition, the favorite winning by exactly 1 run. BOL
My friend, since leaving the armpit on the Erie Kazmir has been what he was meant to be. Do you still hold the same opinion of Max Scherzer you held when he was in Arizona?
Feel the burn.
0
Quote Originally Posted by KeyElement:
My friend, since leaving the armpit on the Erie Kazmir has been what he was meant to be. Do you still hold the same opinion of Max Scherzer you held when he was in Arizona?
Just a little bit to think about on the Astros game....Astros swept the Royals a couple of weeks ago....won't be easy now that they are on road...Yes...they are a very good road team, just something to think about....that's all.
0
Just a little bit to think about on the Astros game....Astros swept the Royals a couple of weeks ago....won't be easy now that they are on road...Yes...they are a very good road team, just something to think about....that's all.
Originally Posted by KeyElement So, the Braves have played 33.7% of their games within 1 run. Deduct 18 outright wins and +1.5 would have saved them in only 14 of their overall 95 games. Any result other than a 1 run win by the Cardinals costs you either either return on risk or the total wagered amount, regardless of what it is. -130 pays 77 cents on the dollar, but if you feel the +1.5 is worth over 50% of the potential profit, well, it's always your money, your choice. Personally, just speaking for myself, I hate the +1.5 run line. It seems to be extremely expensive insurance that only pays off under 1 specific condition, the favorite winning by exactly 1 run. BOL
IMHO, the RL is a good play only if you have large parlay with one team remaining and go opposite for the hedge.
0
Originally Posted by KeyElement So, the Braves have played 33.7% of their games within 1 run. Deduct 18 outright wins and +1.5 would have saved them in only 14 of their overall 95 games. Any result other than a 1 run win by the Cardinals costs you either either return on risk or the total wagered amount, regardless of what it is. -130 pays 77 cents on the dollar, but if you feel the +1.5 is worth over 50% of the potential profit, well, it's always your money, your choice. Personally, just speaking for myself, I hate the +1.5 run line. It seems to be extremely expensive insurance that only pays off under 1 specific condition, the favorite winning by exactly 1 run. BOL
IMHO, the RL is a good play only if you have large parlay with one team remaining and go opposite for the hedge.
Just a little bit to think about on the Astros game....Astros swept the Royals a couple of weeks ago....won't be easy now that they are on road...Yes...they are a very good road team, just something to think about....that's all.
I understand that, but I am not playing the series, just one specific game in one specific situation. The rest will take care of itself.
Now and then even a BLIND squirrel can find an acorn
0
Quote Originally Posted by Astros93:
Just a little bit to think about on the Astros game....Astros swept the Royals a couple of weeks ago....won't be easy now that they are on road...Yes...they are a very good road team, just something to think about....that's all.
I understand that, but I am not playing the series, just one specific game in one specific situation. The rest will take care of itself.
you mean the frasor and detwiler that have pitched a total of 4 innings for the braves???? to say the braves bullpen is improved and then cite those two pitchers is absurd. Detwiler was one of the WORST starters in the league before the braves got ahold of him. frasor had almost as many walks as strikeouts with the royals. when one of the best teams in baseball gives up on a reliever with a 1.54 era, that doesn't raise a red flag for you?
0
you mean the frasor and detwiler that have pitched a total of 4 innings for the braves???? to say the braves bullpen is improved and then cite those two pitchers is absurd. Detwiler was one of the WORST starters in the league before the braves got ahold of him. frasor had almost as many walks as strikeouts with the royals. when one of the best teams in baseball gives up on a reliever with a 1.54 era, that doesn't raise a red flag for you?
you mean the frasor and detwiler that have pitched a total of 4 innings for the braves???? to say the braves bullpen is improved and then cite those two pitchers is absurd. Detwiler was one of the WORST starters in the league before the braves got ahold of him. frasor had almost as many walks as strikeouts with the royals. when one of the best teams in baseball gives up on a reliever with a 1.54 era, that doesn't raise a red flag for you?
Last years stats with a different team and pitching in a different position don't mean a damn thing
0
Quote Originally Posted by mabber:
you mean the frasor and detwiler that have pitched a total of 4 innings for the braves???? to say the braves bullpen is improved and then cite those two pitchers is absurd. Detwiler was one of the WORST starters in the league before the braves got ahold of him. frasor had almost as many walks as strikeouts with the royals. when one of the best teams in baseball gives up on a reliever with a 1.54 era, that doesn't raise a red flag for you?
Last years stats with a different team and pitching in a different position don't mean a damn thing
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.