All Forums | MLB Betting

Multiple MLB Chase Systems (+250 units in 2012)

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 114169
Posts: 643
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2013
Posts: 93
Posted: #526
sorry niner one more question.  How come you went with a couple of dogs today? d backs and rockies.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2013
Posts: 326
Posted: #527
Quote Originally Posted by honolulu:

sorry niner one more question.  How come you went with a couple of dogs today? d backs and rockies.

Are you referring to the Series Chase Plays? Those chases require us to play the team to win at least one game in the 3 or 4 game series. It does not matter if they are dogs or not, we're still playing them to win. In essence, we're taking the superior team to not get swept. We got the better team at + odds, which is great value IMO. good luck
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2007
Posts: 397
Posted: #528
Is #186 done?
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2013
Posts: 93
Posted: #529
Quote Originally Posted by ninersfan1949:


Are you referring to the Series Chase Plays? Those chases require us to play the team to win at least one game in the 3 or 4 game series. It does not matter if they are dogs or not, we're still playing them to win. In essence, we're taking the superior team to not get swept. We got the better team at + odds, which is great value IMO. good luck

hence the name series chace plays.  thanks for clarifying.  makes sense.  babu #186 is still a game 3 pending
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2013
Posts: 93
Posted: #530
Quote Originally Posted by ninersfan1949:


Are you referring to the Series Chase Plays? Those chases require us to play the team to win at least one game in the 3 or 4 game series. It does not matter if they are dogs or not, we're still playing them to win. In essence, we're taking the superior team to not get swept. We got the better team at + odds, which is great value IMO. good luck

hence the name series chace plays.  thanks for clarifying.  makes sense.  babu #186 is still a game 3 pending
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2010
Posts: 184
Posted: #531
Angels ugh
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2013
Posts: 326
Posted: #532
Recap of 5/31/13 Part 1:

4 game chase play:
#185: Angels -257 (2714/1056) for G3
#192: Reds -123 (581/472) for G2
#196: Dbacks +1.5 -180 (180/100)for G1
#197: Tigers -136 (136/100) for G1
#198: Tigers -136 (136/100) for G1
#199: Angels -257 (257/100) for G1
#200: Mariners -131 (131/100) for G1
#201: Phillies -127 (381/300) for G1 [3u]
#202: Yankees -115 (115/100) for G1
#203: Yankees -115 (115/100) for G1
#204: Indians +1.5 -160 (160/100) for G1
#205: Mets -152 (304/200) for G1 [2u]
#206: Rangers -217 (217/100) for G1

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2013
Posts: 326
Posted: #533
YTD: 186-4 +3829
Game 1: 121 (#181 pending)
Game 2: 43 (#176, #177, #178, #183, #191, #196, #197, #198, #199, #201, #204, #205 pending)
Game 3: 15 (#186 pending)
Game 4: 7 (#146, #185 pending)
Losses: 4

Series Chase Plays:
#51: Cardinals -143 (143/100) for Game 1 P
#52: A’s -175 (350/200) for Game 1 [2u] W
#53: Angels -248 (248/100) for Game 1 L
#54: Dbacks +108 (100/108) for Game 1 L
#55: Pirates -115 (115/100) for Game 1 L
#56: Rangers -217 (217/100) for Game 1 W
#57: Braves -108 (108/100) for Game 1 L
#58: Cardinals -143 (143/100) for Game 1 P
#59: Rockies +123 (100/123) for Game 1 L

YTD: 50-1 +4911
Game 1: 40 (#44, #51, #58 pending)
Game 2: 7 (#53, #54, #55, #57, #58, #59 pending)
Game 3: 3
Losses: 1
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2013
Posts: 326
Posted: #534
Plays for 6/1/13 P1:

4 game chase play:
#185: Angels -238 (5403/2270) for Game 4
#186: Mets -110 (444/404) for Game 2
#196: Dbacks +1.5 2.8u for Game 2 (no line atm)
#197: Tigers -133 (314/236) for Game 2
#198: Tigers -133 (314/236) for Game 2
#199: Angels -238 (850/357) for Game 2
#201: Phillies 4.81u for Game 2 (no line atm)
#204: Indians 2.6u for Game 2 (waiting on line)
#207: Tigers -133 (798/600) for Game 1 [6u]
#208: Rockies -128 (768/600) for Game 1 [6u]
#209: Rockies -128 (128/100) for Game 1
#210: Braves -138  (828/600) for Game 1 [6u]

Notes:
Transferred a total of 15 units from Chase #185 to other chases indicated as 6u. 54 units is more than enough on a single game 4. Saying a huge card would be an understatement. 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2013
Posts: 326
Posted: #535
Plays for 6/1/13 P2:

Series Chase Plays:
#53: Angels -238 (850/357) for Game 2
#54: Dbacks +121 (200/242) for Game 2
#55: Pirates -132 (284/215) for Game 2
#57: Braves -138 (287/208) for Game 2
#59: Rockies -128 (256/200) for Game 2

Notes:
If Cardinals lose first game of the double header, bet them the 2nd game.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2013
Posts: 326
Posted: #536
Opps, forgot to add:


Series Chase Plays:
#51: Cardinals 1u for Game 1 (no line atm)
#58: Cardinals 1u for Game 1 (no line atm)
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2013
Posts: 326
Posted: #537
Opps, #186 is supposed to be chase #205
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2010
Posts: 184
Posted: #538
Gl...
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2013
Posts: 326
Posted: #539

Plays for 6/1/13 P1:


All lines updated. Let's throw out a prayer, fellas. We're gonna need it. 

4 game chase play:
#185: Angels -238 (5403/2270) for Game 4
#205: Mets -110 (444/404) for Game 2
#196: Dbacks +1.5 -170 (476/280) for Game 2
#197: Tigers -133 (314/236) for Game 2
#198: Tigers -133 (314/236) for Game 2
#199: Angels -238 (850/357) for Game 2
#201: Phillies -122 (587/481) for Game 2
#204: Indians -130 (338/260) for Game 2
#207: Tigers -133 (798/600) for Game 1 [6u]
#208: Rockies -128 (768/600) for Game 1 [6u]
#209: Rockies -128 (128/100) for Game 1
#210: Braves -138  (828/600) for Game 1 [6u]

Notes:
Transferred a total of 15 units from Chase #185 to other chases indicated as 6u. 54 units is more than enough on a single game 4. Saying a huge card would be an understatement. 

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2013
Posts: 326
Posted: #540

Plays for 6/1/13 P2:


Series Chase Plays:
#53: Angels -238 (850/357) for Game 2
#54: Dbacks +121 (200/242) for Game 2
#55: Pirates -132 (284/215) for Game 2
#57: Braves -138 (287/208) for Game 2
#59: Rockies -128 (256/200) for Game 2

#51: Cardinals -150 (150/100) for Game 1
#58: Cardinals -150 (150/100) for Game 1

Notes:
If Cardinals lose first game of the double header, bet them the 2nd game.

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2010
Posts: 184
Posted: #541
204 Indians ML?  not RL like yesterday? 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2010
Posts: 184
Posted: #542
Well they r the favs this game, so no RL makes sense. Kind of a dumb question that I answered myself
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2012
Posts: 508
Posted: #543
Niners,

I greatly appreciate you posting your system plays here, so take what follows as only constructive criticism.  You have WAY too many plays going on at the same time for good bankroll management.

I figured I'd do some math since my actual bank total wasn't growing despite showing all those winning cleared chases.  Here are the results just for today:

     Total bets made (today)=-13425
     Pending bets (not including today)=-1900 (assumes an even odds bet at the pending level, so this is very optimistic)
     Winnings=+8740

     NET=-6585

If you play each unit at the suggested 0.5% of your original bank, this NET represents about 1/3 of your roll is outstanding!!  That's not good.

Since my own roll was small at the start of this, I purposely chose to reduce your plays, which means I haven't won as much, but I don't have as much outstanding either.  The series chase plays are the easiest to understand & pick versus the 4-game chases, since I don't know your systems & what those plays are going to be in the future.  I'd suggest eliminating plays with odds over -200 or so since that puts way too many units on the line to win just 1 unit compounded in a 4 game chase & doesn't even follow good MLB single game rules of thumb for ML odds.
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2012
Posts: 508
Posted: #544
For clarity, those unit results I added up for today are those that Niner's listed.  My plays are only a fraction of that list.

(blasted forum desperately needs an edit function)
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2013
Posts: 326
Posted: #545
Hardtimes85:

Understood and point taken. Thanks for the analysis. I'm considering playing the -1.5 when such heavy chalk chases like this happens, it will significantly reduce the juice. It isn't exactly the system play but it dramatically reduces the amount risk.

Thanks again for the feedback.

As far as too many plays, yes it is a lot of plays. If anyone can't afford to play them all, I would suggest lowering your unit size or picking the chases you like and play those. Just a fyi, there are other systems I play as well so I have tons of action everyday and I have been doing this for years and it's been working for me.

Again, chase systems aren't good for the heart, it's EXTREMELY high risk high reward.

good luck everyone
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2013
Posts: 93
Posted: #546
I play this system exactly how niners suggests (at 100 per unit).  The only thing i question is if we should spread units around on game 4s.  Did you do that in the past niners?  Today we are playing a lot of 6 unit game ones which if they go to game 4 we will be in trouble (or have to split again).  Niner why not just ride the system as designed and accept there may be some game 4 losses but overall we will come out ahead.  I am running into a little bit of trouble with the 3 unit and now 6 unit game ones were i think i would of rather took my chances on a full bet for game 4 (on the dodgers plus 1.5 last time and the angels tonight even though that would be a bet of about 8000.  What do you think niner?
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2012
Posts: 138
Posted: #547
6u plays went HARD!!!!!
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2002
Posts: 7112
Posted: #548
Damn Angels!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2010
Posts: 1834
Posted: #549
 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2010
Posts: 184
Posted: #550
Angels really really really hurt me w this chase system. Laying -220 or more and losing 4 games in a row is just absurd and god damn expensive. All my profit from the year is now gone, so disappointed blahhhhhhh
All Forums | MLB Betting
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.