REDS

RL +3.. -170... 85 units... This could be one of those games for the Mets offense to take a night off after a series with the Braves.. Not saying they won’t win but Reds offense will score a few.. I see maybe a 4-2 type game.. +3 at -170 is GREAT value.. as always BOL Gentlemen 

-170 anything is never great value lol ust take them ML

@FormerAthlete

 -170 and +3 runs is GREAT value.. why would I take them on the money line if I believe their going to lose a tight game... Could they win? Of course.. but their able to lose by 1,2,3 and worst case scenery it’s a wash.. if I take them  On the money line and they lose by 1, I lose.. Nice attempt at trying to jump down my throat though..

why would u take them at all if u think they gonna lose lol.... like i said... no value in -170. Pay more to win less when u think tehy already going to lose. So u spotting 1 run to win and 1 to push... what a waste. 

@FormerAthlete

Their getting 3 runs.. not sure where you see 1 run.. again, Nice attempt at being ignorant..

u think they going to lose... so thats already 1 run out of ur +3... because when a team lsoes they lose by at least 1... so ur not giving urself 3 runs u are giving 1 run to win because u only win -170 if they lose by 2... if they lose by 3 its a push and a waste of ur time... so ur banking on 1 outcome lol...

can u get dumber?

If you blindly bet $100 on every MLB team that was an underdog of at least +225, you would be up $2,363 with a 38.7% ROI this season. Like I said. Take ML and just relax and sit back

@FormerAthlete

 Did you ever take another team in another sport with the spread? Not thinking they would win the game but cover? That’s what a run line is for in baseball..

@FormerAthlete

I don’t insult people on here but calling somebody dumb and then Posting that logic  that you copy and pasted from somewhere.. is all I need to know.. BOL pal

@FormerAthlete

 57-29 since the All Star Break.. I’m ok with you calling me dumb all you want..

no thats just dumb. I take teams I think will win, why would I ever bet on a team to cover a spread when I think they will lose. 

I will just not bet that game and find one where I think they will win lol 

posting a real stat that shows value is in the ML is stupid? LOL oh brother. 

@FormerAthlete

 Ignorance is bliss.

So you never bet the spread on a underdog in any sport?? 

Why bet on a team if you dont think there going to win has gotta be the dumbest angle I've heard on here And that's saying a lot. 

And as they say "scoreboard" 

Look at the guys record. Not like hes laying -300 chalk on every pick..

betting -170 with that record u might be up 2/3 units lol not impressive at all - whats your ROI? How many units u up? We all can be 57-29 betting -170 and higher faves lol 

pple like u crack me up - think record means anything - does not show ROI or unit count lol 

Ill bet spreads if its -110.... who in the fkn hell are betting -170 spreads LOL and ucall me dumb? LOL hilarious 

I can guarantee if he betting -170 for 85 units.... he is 100% betting majority of his plays at -150 or higher... ill let u do the math in how many he has to get right to create a profit at -150... and thats being conservative. 

Records mean absolute nothing in sports - its all about Return on Investment. At the minimum it should be a Unit count with ur average unit bet. 

We all can chose -200s and win at a 57-29 rate... but guess what.. thats still minus units lol 

I dont like laying anything south of -140 ish in baseball,  but I say pretty much no chance they lose by 4 runs today. Tt is probably 3 so..

@FormerAthlete

 I went back to look as some of your previous posts and all it was were posts of you jumping in peoples threads.. EXACTLY what I expected 

@FormerAthlete

 Please just stop... your making zero sense.. BOL to you..

@FormerAthlete

 Simple solution.  Start posting picks along with lines, record, and units.

Should be up 100s of units by season end I would imagine.. 

But wait, of course you wont..

Bol..

@BigDickHertzer

 We would like to see your post 

thanks

@POOR

 This post go to 

That trumps my Mets -2.5:). Reds starting a kid who has a 6+ era in the minors:) Mets are raking against righties

@Fallser29

 -170 / thats @1.58 

i got three sites

It’s at  -138 / 1.72  cin +3

and -142 or @1.70 cin +3 on my other two sites

just sharing as you got a big play,  your numbers are way down. Cant resist myself not to speak up seeing a big play, with your books giving you that kind of gap.

Maybe you meant you got @1.70  though? 

I like the cin to cover too. Might get 2.5 as my back up play.