All Forums | MLB Betting

THE CHASERS LOUNGE...

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 23588
Posts: 265
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2011
Posts: 1
Posted: #151

Im on the Unders tonight and F5 Detroit

McShady I send ya a email, If possible I would still like to enjoy access to your SS it has been very helpful all year long.  Keep up the good work sir.

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2012
Posts: 29
Posted: #152
Hey McShady,

I just sent you a friend request. I'd like to give you my email afterwards as I value your SS and input. You won't ever hear me talk negative like some of the turds on the forum. I just can't understand people sometimes. Thanks bud. 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2012
Posts: 13
Posted: #153

mcShady,

 

I also sent you an e-mail for access to your ss.Nothing negitive will come from me either...

 

Thanks

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2012
Posts: 618
Posted: #154

I am not trying to question your intelligence or your records. All I am saying is last week Nebraska -6.5 and Louisville were listed on the spreadsheet under the -6.5 column.  After both lost they were deleted from the spreadsheet.  That misleads the readers and the records.  Thats all I am saying.  It has nothing to do with your personal records for the year.  I am not trying to be a azz I just am stating fact.  Now, this week, the spreadsheet reflects that -6.5 is for the "NFL Only".

Sorry you took it personal I am just pointing out that changes to the spreadsheet ae made after games are over which is mosleading, especially if someone plays them and loses like what happened last week.

Good luck to you. 

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2008
Posts: 74
Posted: #155
Js4u,I always see you lurking around and bringing poison to other people's threads,read through the previous threads and find out why those games were deleted from the spread sheets
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2012
Posts: 618
Posted: #156
Quote Originally Posted by McShady:

jus4

Where did I ever post Neb -6.5 & LVille -6.5 as a play? So whos cares if I delete them. All I know is you are too stupid to even pay attn. So just try and discredit me like you did PORKY. yea we all saw how you turn on someone like a lil bitch!

Go check my plays on COVERS. I hit at a 75% and share for FREE. You a gambling lost cause...

You asked me "Where did I ever post Neb -6.5 & LVille -6.5 as a play?" and then say "So whos cares if I delete them". 

That statement actually contradicts each other don't they?  Thats like saying "I didn't bet on the 49ers" and then saying "So who cares if I bet on the 49ers".

Thats classic.

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2012
Posts: 13
Posted: #157
Quote Originally Posted by js4u:

You asked me "Where did I ever post Neb -6.5 & LVille -6.5 as a play?" and then say "So whos cares if I delete them". 

That statement actually contradicts each other don't they?  Thats like saying "I didn't bet on the 49ers" and then saying "So who cares if I bet on the 49ers".

Thats classic.

 

Hey jack a$$

 

Do you have nothing better to do then to come here and start sh@t.. If you don't like what happens here do come here..There are plenty of other sites to go to..You would fit in perfect at the lock thead on cbs.

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2012
Posts: 618
Posted: #158

nase "You won't ever hear me talk negative"

westernrattler "Nothing negitive will come from me either..."

You dont have to kiss his ass....I was simply asking why plays were deleted.  Is that bad to ask?  Does that make a a troublemaker?  If so why?  I have to go back and read 100 pages to find out why?  Just sayin.

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2012
Posts: 618
Posted: #159

Quote Originally Posted by McShady:

If you can can use my SS for a positive purpose...email me your screen name and ill give access. Sorry if i dont recognize u...

Lord, this is funny.  I guess this thread is a communist thread?  If anyone speaks up and asks a question they are removed from receiving information?  Thats to funny.  Sounds like a dictatorship to me.

 

 

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2012
Posts: 373
Posted: #160
Quote Originally Posted by js4u:

I am not trying to question your intelligence or your records. All I am saying is last week Nebraska -6.5 and Louisville were listed on the spreadsheet under the -6.5 column.  After both lost they were deleted from the spreadsheet.  That misleads the readers and the records.  Thats all I am saying.  It has nothing to do with your personal records for the year.  I am not trying to be a azz I just am stating fact.  Now, this week, the spreadsheet reflects that -6.5 is for the "NFL Only".

Sorry you took it personal I am just pointing out that changes to the spreadsheet ae made after games are over which is mosleading, especially if someone plays them and loses like what happened last week.

Good luck to you. 

Who played the spreadsheet and lost last weekend? What ss are you looking at? 52-11 but you lost on a number last week. Do you know how stupid you look? Seriously, just don't come hang out here. Have you posted a play here? How'd that SF-9 play you dropped on another posting do for you against SEA +7,5 set number? You knew of that trend play cause you were posting here about it yet recommended the opposite with SF-9 on the trends thread on another discussion. How many people lost on your false trend info with you touting SF-9 after you were aware of the set trend from being informed on this thread? You're nothing more than a charlatan, a poseur, bugger off.

 

 

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2012
Posts: 618
Posted: #161
Quote Originally Posted by westernrattler:

 

Hey jack a$$

 

Do you have nothing better to do then to come here and start sh@t.. If you don't like what happens here do come here..There are plenty of other sites to go to..You would fit in perfect at the lock thead on cbs.

I ASKED A IMPLE QUESTION AND ALL THE INDIANS COME TO DEFEND THE CHIEF.....
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2012
Posts: 618
Posted: #162
Quote Originally Posted by Newfie_Bullet:

Who played the spreadsheet and lost last weekend? What ss are you looking at? 52-11 but you lost on a number last week. Do you know how stupid you look? Seriously, just don't come hang out here. Have you posted a play here? How'd that SF-9 play you dropped on another posting do for you against SEA +7,5 set number? You knew of that trend play cause you were posting here about it yet recommended the opposite with SF-9 on the trends thread on another discussion. How many people lost on your false trend info with you touting SF-9 after you were aware of the set trend from being informed on this thread? You're nothing more than a charlatan, a poseur, bugger off.

 

 

You just stepped on your own Dic_ bud.  Ok now I have to call you out.  You make a statement that I posted SF -9 which was a play supposively against a SS play right?  OK, post the thread link and PROVE what you just said.  Lets see how credible you are so the readers can see.  I'll be waiting.  Oh, and by the, no response is the same as posting false information.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2011
Posts: 2768
Posted: #163
Its done. I fixed it so this scenerio wont happen again. 

Im a fraud and a loser. You win. Go away
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2012
Posts: 813
Posted: #164

Everyone, please ignore this idiot...

Who is chasing the under in tonight's Baseball game?

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2012
Posts: 373
Posted: #165
js4u says:
10/15/12 10:24AM
With 2 even teams (SF/SEA) the line opened at -9 and that seems to tell me one thing. Why is the line so high? I see this as a 49er wager or nothing based solely on the opening line.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2012
Posts: 618
Posted: #166
Quote Originally Posted by McShady:

Its done. I fixed it so this scenerio wont happen again. 

Im a fraud and a loser. You win. Go away
Did I cll you a fraud?  Did I call you a loser?  I simply asked a question and received no response but rather I was attacked by you and all the Indians.  You still havent answered the question.
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2012
Posts: 639
Posted: #167
Shut the Fuck Up js4u.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2012
Posts: 618
Posted: #168
Quote Originally Posted by Newfie_Bullet:

js4u says:
10/15/12 10:24AM
With 2 even teams (SF/SEA) the line opened at -9 and that seems to tell me one thing. Why is the line so high? I see this as a 49er wager or nothing based solely on the opening line.
Thats not me buddie but nice try.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2012
Posts: 373
Posted: #169
https://spaces.covers.com/blog/js4u/NFL/10152012-NFL-Strong-Team-Trends.html
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2012
Posts: 373
Posted: #170
Nice try fraud. One look at your space and it's easy to see you are all ove the betting blogs spreading nothing but deceit and misinformation
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2012
Posts: 249
Posted: #171
dont check the thread, make up your own plays. speaking for myself, ima novice bettor im here to learn not to have some asshole fuck it up for me and the rest. go away. 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2011
Posts: 117
Posted: #172
@js4u - Your argument of the plays being removed are fundamentally flawed. The "plays" on the spreadsheet are not plays. No one tells you to play them. They are one man's research. How he uses them are up to him.

Let me see your spreadsheet...
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2012
Posts: 618
Posted: #173
Quote Originally Posted by Newfie_Bullet:

https://spaces.covers.com/blog/js4u/NFL/10152012-NFL-Strong-Team-Trends.html
Where in that quote does it say I made a play on the 49ers?  Can you post that?  I said a play on 49ers OR NO PLAY.  Nice try again.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2012
Posts: 618
Posted: #174

Quote Originally Posted by Bettingbrothers:

@js4u - Your argument of the plays being removed are fundamentally flawed. The "plays" on the spreadsheet are not plays. No one tells you to play them. They are one man's research. How he uses them are up to him.

Let me see your spreadsheet...
If you insert plays on a spreadsheet and a record of those plays, as he does, you cannot place plays on the sheet, and then when they lose, take them off.  Especially when their is a record of such plays under each spread at the top.  THATS MY POINT.  Is it that hard to understand? 

I still havent received a answer of why they were taken off of the sheet after they lost???????

 
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2011
Posts: 2768
Posted: #175
How is it misleading people when everyrthing on there is a TRUE statement. I know u dont know how to come up with ur own winning formula. But this how its done. 

If a trend is 10-6 w/ NFL & CFB and u FILTER out a type of play (CFB) then the trend is 10-2. Wouldnt u like to know that moving forward?

You want to be spoon fed easy plays that win. I get it. But if u cant get over a couple losses that you chose and I NEVER endorsed. Whats your objective?
All Forums | MLB Betting
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2025 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.