This is truly incredible.
I have 24 losses in a row for teams where...
they lost the 2 previous games, on the ROAD, scoring less than 3 runs, in each game, and...
in the next game are a ROAD DOG with a line worse than +135.
No wins since April. All losses... 24 straight.
The play would be TOR ML -165 or maybe TOR RL +120 if you feel lucky.
This is truly incredible.
I have 24 losses in a row for teams where...
they lost the 2 previous games, on the ROAD, scoring less than 3 runs, in each game, and...
in the next game are a ROAD DOG with a line worse than +135.
No wins since April. All losses... 24 straight.
The play would be TOR ML -165 or maybe TOR RL +120 if you feel lucky.
@MITM
Hey there....what's the limit here when you say at least a +150 dog? Does that mean it needs to be higher or lower than a +150 dog? Just would like some clarification, as I did some back tracking and there's an instance where Detroit scored 2 runs or less in 2 straight road games (June 6 + June 8), then won their next one as a +175 dog against Minny (June 15th)? Or does this system refer to only the same series between 2 teams? Thanks.
@MITM
Hey there....what's the limit here when you say at least a +150 dog? Does that mean it needs to be higher or lower than a +150 dog? Just would like some clarification, as I did some back tracking and there's an instance where Detroit scored 2 runs or less in 2 straight road games (June 6 + June 8), then won their next one as a +175 dog against Minny (June 15th)? Or does this system refer to only the same series between 2 teams? Thanks.
@fitchris562
Nope, if I said that, I mis spoke.
You must FADE the road team if they have scored 2 or fewer runs in 2 straight road games and are still on the road. And are at least a ,(+150) dog in that third game
Maybe someone else can explain it better
@fitchris562
Nope, if I said that, I mis spoke.
You must FADE the road team if they have scored 2 or fewer runs in 2 straight road games and are still on the road. And are at least a ,(+150) dog in that third game
Maybe someone else can explain it better
No, someone just needs to understand it better...
No, someone just needs to understand it better...
Ok, so here is where someone else explained it:
For a team where...
they lost the 2 previous games, on the ROAD, scoring less than 3 runs, in each game, and...
in the next game are a ROAD DOG with a line worse than +135.
No wins since April. All losses... 24 straight.
_________________________________________
I thought it was less than 2 runs in each game for 2 straight games? Guess I'll try and find the video.
Ok, so here is where someone else explained it:
For a team where...
they lost the 2 previous games, on the ROAD, scoring less than 3 runs, in each game, and...
in the next game are a ROAD DOG with a line worse than +135.
No wins since April. All losses... 24 straight.
_________________________________________
I thought it was less than 2 runs in each game for 2 straight games? Guess I'll try and find the video.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.