System is called "The Scoring Drought":
Fade the road team if:
The team lost their past 2 games when scoring 2 runs or less in each of those defeats; and their moneyline is greater than +150 as a dog.
Undefeated since this year April, apparently.
System is called "The Scoring Drought":
Fade the road team if:
The team lost their past 2 games when scoring 2 runs or less in each of those defeats; and their moneyline is greater than +150 as a dog.
Undefeated since this year April, apparently.
System is called "The Scoring Drought":
Fade the road team if:
The team lost their past 2 games when scoring 2 runs or less in each of those defeats; and their moneyline is greater than +150 as a dog.
Undefeated since this year April, apparently.
If u say less than 3 runs or u say 2 runs or fewer, I believe that's the same thing.
If they score (0, 1 or 2) in 2 straight ROAD games and are on the road in game 3 and are a dog of at least (+150) u fade them. It has hit 24 in a row.
That's how Professor MJ explained it
If u say less than 3 runs or u say 2 runs or fewer, I believe that's the same thing.
If they score (0, 1 or 2) in 2 straight ROAD games and are on the road in game 3 and are a dog of at least (+150) u fade them. It has hit 24 in a row.
That's how Professor MJ explained it
Sheesh......this is so easy to understand and it has won 24 straight times! Stop trying to dissect it and reinvent the wheel. Some of you would screw up a free lunch.
Sheesh......this is so easy to understand and it has won 24 straight times! Stop trying to dissect it and reinvent the wheel. Some of you would screw up a free lunch.
Well guys Professor MJ says the Yankees are a play tonight.
KC has lost 2 straight games, scoring 2 runs or less but these 2 games were at home.
I messaged him about it. Waiting on his response.
Falcon
Well guys Professor MJ says the Yankees are a play tonight.
KC has lost 2 straight games, scoring 2 runs or less but these 2 games were at home.
I messaged him about it. Waiting on his response.
Falcon
Looks like it is 2 straight games of a team scoring 2 runs or less. Then the third game has to be a road game, where the road team is a dog of (+150) or higher.
So we do have a play today.
Fade the Royals and play the Yankees.
Falcon
Looks like it is 2 straight games of a team scoring 2 runs or less. Then the third game has to be a road game, where the road team is a dog of (+150) or higher.
So we do have a play today.
Fade the Royals and play the Yankees.
Falcon
You said this earlier
You must FADE the road team if they have scored 2 or fewer runs in 2 straight road games and are still on the road. And are at least a ,(+150) dog in that third game
You said this earlier
You must FADE the road team if they have scored 2 or fewer runs in 2 straight road games and are still on the road. And are at least a ,(+150) dog in that third game
@smellybunty
I said it yes but its not my system. I could have misunderstood.
I just checked where Professor MJ explained and the FADE is the road team but the two previous games could have been on the road or at home.
I messaged him to make sure. U can go on YouTube and look him up and confirm this.
He also didn't count Arizona last Sunday.
I have this at 24 in a row. But its not my system
Falcon
@smellybunty
I said it yes but its not my system. I could have misunderstood.
I just checked where Professor MJ explained and the FADE is the road team but the two previous games could have been on the road or at home.
I messaged him to make sure. U can go on YouTube and look him up and confirm this.
He also didn't count Arizona last Sunday.
I have this at 24 in a row. But its not my system
Falcon
I just checked an old YouTube video where he explained it.
FADE the road team if they have scored 2 runs or less in their previous 2 games (doesn't matter home or away) and they are at least a (+150) road dog.
Thats how he explained it. Your welcome to look it up. I messaged him to ask and I also asked him about Arizona last Sunday
When he responds ill let u know.
But it looks like u are supposed to FADE the Royals tonight.
Falcon
I just checked an old YouTube video where he explained it.
FADE the road team if they have scored 2 runs or less in their previous 2 games (doesn't matter home or away) and they are at least a (+150) road dog.
Thats how he explained it. Your welcome to look it up. I messaged him to ask and I also asked him about Arizona last Sunday
When he responds ill let u know.
But it looks like u are supposed to FADE the Royals tonight.
Falcon
I've personally played the last 3 to win $200 on each. I'll stick with that amount ($400 to win $200) at Draftkings.
This system isn't mine. I don't count it in my records but I'm (3-0) (+$600) on it.
I've personally played the last 3 to win $200 on each. I'll stick with that amount ($400 to win $200) at Draftkings.
This system isn't mine. I don't count it in my records but I'm (3-0) (+$600) on it.
If it loses I'm out. I have hit three in a row so I have to continue until it loses. Last juice I will lay when it gets a loss but what if it wins the rest of year. I got to stay on it.
Still no response from Professor MJ
If it loses I'm out. I have hit three in a row so I have to continue until it loses. Last juice I will lay when it gets a loss but what if it wins the rest of year. I got to stay on it.
Still no response from Professor MJ
Line dropping like a dead body. -210 to -190
On the worst team in the league
Thinking about Yankd double result which pays +110
If Yankees win I think it is an easy win.
That is gambling
Line dropping like a dead body. -210 to -190
On the worst team in the league
Thinking about Yankd double result which pays +110
If Yankees win I think it is an easy win.
That is gambling
No, the two games scoring 2 runs or less could've occurred anywhere. The Royals qualify today as the team to bet against.
No, the two games scoring 2 runs or less could've occurred anywhere. The Royals qualify today as the team to bet against.
If u go to his YouTube videos and look at the one for July 7th, he shows every team in the streak.
The streak is at either 23, 24 or 25 straight. He isn't counting Arizona last Sunday but pinnacle had them as qualifying
Falcon
If u go to his YouTube videos and look at the one for July 7th, he shows every team in the streak.
The streak is at either 23, 24 or 25 straight. He isn't counting Arizona last Sunday but pinnacle had them as qualifying
Falcon
@MrBator
Running it through the sportsdatabase.com, there is no play for tonight.
KCR/NYY is NOT a play.
KCR was at HOME in its last series, vs. DET.
All the games MUST be on the ROAD to qualify.
It counted 24 losses in a row since April.
There is NO PLAY for tonight.
@MrBator
Running it through the sportsdatabase.com, there is no play for tonight.
KCR/NYY is NOT a play.
KCR was at HOME in its last series, vs. DET.
All the games MUST be on the ROAD to qualify.
It counted 24 losses in a row since April.
There is NO PLAY for tonight.
The pair of low scoring losses that precede the qualifying play had to have to occurred on the road? If so, then why is Professor MJ promoting the Yankees over the Royals tonight as the potential 24th consecutive system winner? Who's right here?
The pair of low scoring losses that precede the qualifying play had to have to occurred on the road? If so, then why is Professor MJ promoting the Yankees over the Royals tonight as the potential 24th consecutive system winner? Who's right here?
Ok he responded to me.
He said it doesn't matter if the 2 games are at home or on the road but the game that your fading them in, the third game has to be on the road.
Therefore tonight is official play.
He also said that Arizona only went above (+150) at the very end. Most of the day they were under this, so he didn't count it.
Falcon
Ok he responded to me.
He said it doesn't matter if the 2 games are at home or on the road but the game that your fading them in, the third game has to be on the road.
Therefore tonight is official play.
He also said that Arizona only went above (+150) at the very end. Most of the day they were under this, so he didn't count it.
Falcon
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.