All Forums | Movies & Television

Vikings tomorrow

Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 2040
Posts: 41
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2001
Posts: 85256
Posted: #26

well they FINALLY got rid of that murdering person Earl Haraldson (played by Gabriel Byrne) in episode 6.

 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2001
Posts: 85256
Posted: #27

Ba$tard changed to "person"?

Ba$tard is too "crude" for Covers? what a bunch of "net nannies"

 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2004
Posts: 28383
Posted: #28
I am still watching it, but i do not think it is very good to be honest.
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2001
Posts: 85256
Posted: #29

Quote Originally Posted by Mikael99:

I am still watching it, but i do not think it is very good to be honest.

agree 100%

 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2004
Posts: 28383
Posted: #30
I am looking forward to friday and sunday this week.  Da Vinci's demons, and The Borgias season 3.
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2001
Posts: 85256
Posted: #31
I'm looking forward to Da Vinci's Demons this Friday April 12th on STARZ. their Wikipage https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Da_Vinci's_Demons shows it's on Fox Channel in Germany IF you get that, Mikael
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2004
Posts: 28383
Posted: #32
I get it the day after it has aired in the states, though the great internets 

It is a small world, especially online.
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2004
Posts: 28383
Posted: #33
Vikings has been picked up by History, for a second season.
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 35391
Posted: #34
Quote Originally Posted by Mikael99:

I am still watching it, but i do not think it is very good to be honest.

Mikael you don't like it?  I love it personally.  Now I am not a great historian when it comes to the Viking age but from what I do know they appear to be pretty decent in replicating what is know about these people.  Love the Ravens reference coming down from Oden to bring news of Earl Haraldssen's death back to the god of gods, among others.  I never heard of the Vikings sacrificing humans to the gods but I looked it up and apparently in rare occasions it did happen.  I think it is a great series and looking forward to more to come.
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 35391
Posted: #35
Quote Originally Posted by LeRinkRat:

starting to lose interest in The Vikings. can't figure out why ANYONE would be loyal to Gabriel Byrne's character Earl Haraldson. the guy murders his lieutenants right and left and reminds me of some incompetent clueless executives I used to fly around when I was a corporate pilot years ago

BOTH "The Big Book of Hebrew Fables: The Movie" AND The Vikings definately NOT as good as recent History Channel offerings


I think that Earl Haraldssen demonstrated why his fellow clansmen follow him all these years despite his rather oppressive style in his dialogue regarding how he actually respects Ragna.  It appears to me from his statements that he took his position out of strength and raw aggression/ambition.  If you can take the position of power away from the man in charge you become the one in charge.  If you cannot then STFU and do what I say bi%ch.  Moreover, you also noticed he has to be this a$$hole or his sub-servants will start following someone stronger than he and he will lose his power.  It is kinda of like a pimp and a bi%ch relationship.
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2004
Posts: 28383
Posted: #36
I did not like the first 5 episodes, it has got a little bit better now. 
I think the biggest failure about it was/is that the dialogue where cheesy and not like how a viking would do it. 

Also some of the phrases used are not correct. Like we are going to Ting .. or Thank you lord .. 

And then the historic part of it is incorrect, which is kinda funny when you consider it airs at History. 

Ragner Lodbrog was a danish viking, and here he is in the norweigan parts of scandinavia. Also Ragner was not the first viking to raid england, and it didnt take place when they say it did.

 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 35391
Posted: #37
Quote Originally Posted by Mikael99:

I did not like the first 5 episodes, it has got a little bit better now. 
I think the biggest failure about it was/is that the dialogue where cheesy and not like how a viking would do it. 

Also some of the phrases used are not correct. Like we are going to Ting .. or Thank you lord .. 

And then the historic part of it is incorrect, which is kinda funny when you consider it airs at History. 

Ragner Lodbrog was a danish viking, and here he is in the norweigan parts of scandinavia. Also Ragner was not the first viking to raid england, and it didnt take place when they say it did.


Yeah you are right about that but like "The Bible" I got past some of the historical inaccuracies and was rejoiced about some of the ones they got right.  What do you think of them using the name Loki for one of the clansmen?  Do you really think any Viking would name themself after a god?  Even though he is my favorite character and just he way he presents himself reminds me of the playful nature of the norse god Loki.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2010
Posts: 1924
Posted: #38

I'm still watching...Mostly because they show it 3 or 4 times every Sunday night and I'm able to watch it at midnight when their ain't s h i t else on.

 

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2010
Posts: 1924
Posted: #39
Quote Originally Posted by jesron1269:


What do you think of them using the name Loki for one of the clansmen?  Do you really think any Viking would name themself after a god?  
 
 
The son asks Ragnar about Floki being named after Loki in 1st or 2nd episode.
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 35391
Posted: #40
Quote Originally Posted by Dutch1976:

 
 
The son asks Ragnar about Floki being named after Loki in 1st or 2nd episode.

I missed that... will have to check that out again.
 
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 35391
Posted: #41
Not a bad finale.  Is the "sickness" that spread in the village supposed to be Dupuytren’s disease?  They set next season up but if you have been watching this year that circumstance was inevitable.  Ragnar is too cunning to not know something is up with his brother.  Interesting plot development.  Thoughts on the finale?
All Forums | Movies & Television
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.