Posted:
#1
I wonder if anybody has done a bit of researching on the difference betting a full game and just 1st half bet. I win games betting full, but I feel overall I don't get alot of comebacks on teams losing 1st half but when I bet full games especially as spreads get bigger I get alot of 2nd half backdoors to occur that would have been 1st half winners such as wizards tonight. I wonder what percent of winning 1st half wagers were also winning full game wagers. I feel like I have to sweat more winners than I should by betting full games and I 'm sure there are others who feel that way especially if you bet cavs as they seem to cover 1st half well but give away full game covers or the spurs who seem to blow everyone out in the 2nd half. Any thoughts much appreciated, would like to get a good solid discussion going as I am sure people have thought this too and have lost on the same issue. Appreciate all responses, I think this is something to think about for all bettors.
0
Hot Forum Topics
