Monty McCutchen: 7-6 SU for the Road Team. Cavs 1-1 & GSW 1-2 w/ McCutchen ref’ing.
Derrick Stafford: 4-3 SU for the Road Team. Cavs 1-1 & GSW 2-1 w/ Stafford ref’ing.
McCutchen + Stafford have ref’d 4 games together these playoffs & are 3-1 for the Road Team.
Zach Zarba: 8-1 SU for the Home Team. Cavs 2-0 & GSW 1-1 w/ Zarba ref’ing
Combined: 17-12 for the Home team. 11-9 for the Road Team (Minus Zarba). Cavs 4-2 – GSW 4-4
---------------------------------------------------
Like i do for most officiating crew i disregard the least important 3rd ref & focus on the top 2. Either way you put it the stats aren't very compelling. Usually if there was to be bias on one side the stats would lead that way. Tonight i anticipated the stats to be skewed towards Lebron & the Cavs.
So again we find ourselves in an interesting situation. I was heavily leading on Cavs but it seems officiating does not convincingly support it tonight. I've followed ref stats in these circumstances and have been successful each time.......so i guess why go against it now.
Play:
GSW +1.5
Again, obviously i'm not confident w/ the play as we are yet again blindly following ref statistics. I did like Cavs to take this game 3 but on the flip i would imagine public perception would be on the Cavs not dropping their first game at home in this finals.....surely they win this one, right?! So far we've been against the public (i believe?). Today will be no different. I'm on a 20-2 run & 2-0 in the finals.....we continue to follow what's been successful in the last 4 playoffs/finals now
Monty McCutchen: 7-6 SU for the Road Team. Cavs 1-1 & GSW 1-2 w/ McCutchen ref’ing.
Derrick Stafford: 4-3 SU for the Road Team. Cavs 1-1 & GSW 2-1 w/ Stafford ref’ing.
McCutchen + Stafford have ref’d 4 games together these playoffs & are 3-1 for the Road Team.
Zach Zarba: 8-1 SU for the Home Team. Cavs 2-0 & GSW 1-1 w/ Zarba ref’ing
Combined: 17-12 for the Home team. 11-9 for the Road Team (Minus Zarba). Cavs 4-2 – GSW 4-4
---------------------------------------------------
Like i do for most officiating crew i disregard the least important 3rd ref & focus on the top 2. Either way you put it the stats aren't very compelling. Usually if there was to be bias on one side the stats would lead that way. Tonight i anticipated the stats to be skewed towards Lebron & the Cavs.
So again we find ourselves in an interesting situation. I was heavily leading on Cavs but it seems officiating does not convincingly support it tonight. I've followed ref stats in these circumstances and have been successful each time.......so i guess why go against it now.
Play:
GSW +1.5
Again, obviously i'm not confident w/ the play as we are yet again blindly following ref statistics. I did like Cavs to take this game 3 but on the flip i would imagine public perception would be on the Cavs not dropping their first game at home in this finals.....surely they win this one, right?! So far we've been against the public (i believe?). Today will be no different. I'm on a 20-2 run & 2-0 in the finals.....we continue to follow what's been successful in the last 4 playoffs/finals now
I call bluff. I don't believe you anymoreyou wouldn't be dumb enough to fade my 5 unit pick which has never lost
I call bluff. I don't believe you anymoreyou wouldn't be dumb enough to fade my 5 unit pick which has never lost
This is a great example of why 2 heads are better than one. You thought game 3 was tricky, while I thought it was one of the easiest plays yet this post season.
So, one games I find tricky and you find easy (during your hot run) we could maximize profits somehow, if we can understand the strength's of each others plays.
For instance yesterday you might of noticed I had a 5 unit post for Cavs ML. I've never lost a 5 unit post, so you'd figure if you were not sure yourself, you could follow someone who was. And vice versa.
Just a thought for you, it works for me. If I am having a trouble on a game I will seek info from someone who does understand the situation better than I do.
This is a great example of why 2 heads are better than one. You thought game 3 was tricky, while I thought it was one of the easiest plays yet this post season.
So, one games I find tricky and you find easy (during your hot run) we could maximize profits somehow, if we can understand the strength's of each others plays.
For instance yesterday you might of noticed I had a 5 unit post for Cavs ML. I've never lost a 5 unit post, so you'd figure if you were not sure yourself, you could follow someone who was. And vice versa.
Just a thought for you, it works for me. If I am having a trouble on a game I will seek info from someone who does understand the situation better than I do.
This is a great example of why 2 heads are better than one. You thought game 3 was tricky, while I thought it was one of the easiest plays yet this post season.
So, one games I find tricky and you find easy (during your hot run) we could maximize profits somehow, if we can understand the strength's of each others plays.
For instance yesterday you might of noticed I had a 5 unit post for Cavs ML. I've never lost a 5 unit post, so you'd figure if you were not sure yourself, you could follow someone who was. And vice versa.
Just a thought for you, it works for me. If I am having a trouble on a game I will seek info from someone who does understand the situation better than I do.
This is a great example of why 2 heads are better than one. You thought game 3 was tricky, while I thought it was one of the easiest plays yet this post season.
So, one games I find tricky and you find easy (during your hot run) we could maximize profits somehow, if we can understand the strength's of each others plays.
For instance yesterday you might of noticed I had a 5 unit post for Cavs ML. I've never lost a 5 unit post, so you'd figure if you were not sure yourself, you could follow someone who was. And vice versa.
Just a thought for you, it works for me. If I am having a trouble on a game I will seek info from someone who does understand the situation better than I do.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.