so youre betting on a trend that you found and dont understand the language to....im only pissing on your parade as it will make you happier in the long run imo.
W means win
WP is win percentage.
the fact that folks are still following this shows the desperate nature of the gambler and why most of us will lose long term.
three people have tried explaining this and still folks are pretending like what we say has no merit. your money your choice, but look at it this way...two people are saying things you dont fully understand, do you follow the original cause you like what he said or neither cause you dont understand what youre doing....food for thought.
ill say it one last time, the query your looking at does not match your query.
truly look at this thread as an example of how/how not to use this forum.
appreciate the idea NYG, but unfortunately i believe youre wrong. BOLTA regardless
0
so youre betting on a trend that you found and dont understand the language to....im only pissing on your parade as it will make you happier in the long run imo.
W means win
WP is win percentage.
the fact that folks are still following this shows the desperate nature of the gambler and why most of us will lose long term.
three people have tried explaining this and still folks are pretending like what we say has no merit. your money your choice, but look at it this way...two people are saying things you dont fully understand, do you follow the original cause you like what he said or neither cause you dont understand what youre doing....food for thought.
ill say it one last time, the query your looking at does not match your query.
truly look at this thread as an example of how/how not to use this forum.
appreciate the idea NYG, but unfortunately i believe youre wrong. BOLTA regardless
NYG- never used t before no idea what it does. also never used (W) in any aspect as its a postdictive variable, and im not familiar in how to incorporate it correctly
0
NYG- never used t before no idea what it does. also never used (W) in any aspect as its a postdictive variable, and im not familiar in how to incorporate it correctly
Monstergrit, I'm not sure if you're trying to insult me or not but I simply ask anyone very good with SDQL what annexing the prefix t does to the query.
The t prefix is a very basic sdql syntax as it reference the "team" in the query. Though I wonder why this trend occurs without it as what would it be referencing if not the team in play? it stands as saying away teams under .500, it possibly means ONLY on the road not the actually teams win percentage,
Aussie or Extremist could be of some help as I know they are well acquainted with the syntax.
And again I can't stress enough to all to not blindly follow a system unless logic backs it and it produces a large sample size. This system is still up in the air.
0
Monstergrit, I'm not sure if you're trying to insult me or not but I simply ask anyone very good with SDQL what annexing the prefix t does to the query.
The t prefix is a very basic sdql syntax as it reference the "team" in the query. Though I wonder why this trend occurs without it as what would it be referencing if not the team in play? it stands as saying away teams under .500, it possibly means ONLY on the road not the actually teams win percentage,
Aussie or Extremist could be of some help as I know they are well acquainted with the syntax.
And again I can't stress enough to all to not blindly follow a system unless logic backs it and it produces a large sample size. This system is still up in the air.
the fact that you still dont believe me is comical. wasnt trying to insult you, just trying to help everyone including yourself, however the fact that you cant see that makes me kinda wanna insult you
peace n whale grease boys, done here
0
the fact that you still dont believe me is comical. wasnt trying to insult you, just trying to help everyone including yourself, however the fact that you cant see that makes me kinda wanna insult you
the fact that you still dont believe me is comical. wasnt trying to insult you, just trying to help everyone including yourself, however the fact that you cant see that makes me kinda wanna insult you
peace n whale grease boys, done here
Dont be done Post you picks from your system
0
Quote Originally Posted by monstergrit:
the fact that you still dont believe me is comical. wasnt trying to insult you, just trying to help everyone including yourself, however the fact that you cant see that makes me kinda wanna insult you
the fact that you still dont believe me is comical. wasnt trying to insult you, just trying to help everyone including yourself, however the fact that you cant see that makes me kinda wanna insult you
peace n whale grease boys, done here
Finally Negative Nelly is leaving.
0
Quote Originally Posted by monstergrit:
the fact that you still dont believe me is comical. wasnt trying to insult you, just trying to help everyone including yourself, however the fact that you cant see that makes me kinda wanna insult you
the fact that you still dont believe me is comical. wasnt trying to insult you, just trying to help everyone including yourself, however the fact that you cant see that makes me kinda wanna insult you
peace n whale grease boys, done here
You don't understand what t means.....of course I don't believe you and your claim of the trend being post-predictive because you're making a fool of yourself, when you don't know basic sdql syntax and come in here acting like you know anything it's laughable. Like trying to teach math when you don't know addition.
"Oh I don't know what the trend you showed me means but let me tell you why the trend is wrong and your all dumb for following it"
Lmfaoooo what a fukin idiot this guy is
See ya! You're not welcome in this thread, "peace and whale grease"...loser who the f*ck says that
0
Quote Originally Posted by monstergrit:
the fact that you still dont believe me is comical. wasnt trying to insult you, just trying to help everyone including yourself, however the fact that you cant see that makes me kinda wanna insult you
peace n whale grease boys, done here
You don't understand what t means.....of course I don't believe you and your claim of the trend being post-predictive because you're making a fool of yourself, when you don't know basic sdql syntax and come in here acting like you know anything it's laughable. Like trying to teach math when you don't know addition.
"Oh I don't know what the trend you showed me means but let me tell you why the trend is wrong and your all dumb for following it"
Lmfaoooo what a fukin idiot this guy is
See ya! You're not welcome in this thread, "peace and whale grease"...loser who the f*ck says that
negative nancy or not im here to help. why would i be against you finding a great trend, im not. im about winning money. thats why i took the time to continually offer advice. cause im a nice guy regardless of yalls hate
0
negative nancy or not im here to help. why would i be against you finding a great trend, im not. im about winning money. thats why i took the time to continually offer advice. cause im a nice guy regardless of yalls hate
nyg- dont you think its kinda nuts how crazy you went when someone proved you wrong? step back and look at that. the above trend is the same as yours only one game lost for both team and opponent. hope you all learned something through all this nonsense
0
nyg- dont you think its kinda nuts how crazy you went when someone proved you wrong? step back and look at that. the above trend is the same as yours only one game lost for both team and opponent. hope you all learned something through all this nonsense
i lied. im a glutten for arguements and attempting to make myself feel better.
just tryin to offer advice on our trend and betting in general, and got a lil pissy when dude put words in my mout.
heres another system for you to follow its 564-0
AD and A(W) <= 0.500 and p:L and op:L and oA(W) >= 0.500
SU:
503-0 (7.64, 100.0%)
ATS:
503-0-0 (13.82, 100.0%)
avg line: 6.2
O/U:
246-245-12 (0.16, 50.1%)
avg total: 194.3
WoW 503-0tjats crazy what's that trend? I've never known there was a trend that was 100% that's crazy!! What's the next play on that trend so I can tail??
0
Quote Originally Posted by monstergrit:
i lied. im a glutten for arguements and attempting to make myself feel better.
just tryin to offer advice on our trend and betting in general, and got a lil pissy when dude put words in my mout.
heres another system for you to follow its 564-0
AD and A(W) <= 0.500 and p:L and op:L and oA(W) >= 0.500
SU:
503-0 (7.64, 100.0%)
ATS:
503-0-0 (13.82, 100.0%)
avg line: 6.2
O/U:
246-245-12 (0.16, 50.1%)
avg total: 194.3
WoW 503-0tjats crazy what's that trend? I've never known there was a trend that was 100% that's crazy!! What's the next play on that trend so I can tail??
We could sit and argue this query that NYG posted a few days ago. Up to him if he wants to continue to follow it.. But here is another one that apparently had 4 active games on it today
A(W)<=0.5 and AD
The results are staggering if you wish to believe in it.. But I obviously don't believe it because the query is not written write.
We could sit and argue this query that NYG posted a few days ago. Up to him if he wants to continue to follow it.. But here is another one that apparently had 4 active games on it today
A(W)<=0.5 and AD
The results are staggering if you wish to believe in it.. But I obviously don't believe it because the query is not written write.
And now even though the query showed all dogs to win today as it was 5167-0 S/U the Mavs lost today but this game will drop off the query tomorrow once the database has been updated because it only shows winners. The Knicks trend the other day was just a lucky fluke. Something will happen today if the Lakers lose.
0
And now even though the query showed all dogs to win today as it was 5167-0 S/U the Mavs lost today but this game will drop off the query tomorrow once the database has been updated because it only shows winners. The Knicks trend the other day was just a lucky fluke. Something will happen today if the Lakers lose.
74-0 boys whats next? thought youd all be jumping for joy after winning in the face of this negative nelly. lmao
What's up Troll. Do you ever post NBA picks or just talk shiz. Looks like the Lakers covered last night. I saw you are only 1 game under .500 on your NCAAB picks. Maybe you should do more capping and less Trolling.
DrKnoNothing Out
0
Quote Originally Posted by monstergrit:
74-0 boys whats next? thought youd all be jumping for joy after winning in the face of this negative nelly. lmao
What's up Troll. Do you ever post NBA picks or just talk shiz. Looks like the Lakers covered last night. I saw you are only 1 game under .500 on your NCAAB picks. Maybe you should do more capping and less Trolling.
lmao. i know the lakeshow covered last night. thats why i bumped this.
i started here to help, not as a troll. now i troll cause this dude and a few others here jumped on me when i questioned your choice to follow something you didnt understand and even showed you how he was wrong multiple times.
maybe you ought to have convos without letting emotion influence perception of fact.
thx for the groundbreaking advice. this is a forum and the point here is to help eachother make money. we can do that in more ways than posting picks
grit out
0
lmao. i know the lakeshow covered last night. thats why i bumped this.
i started here to help, not as a troll. now i troll cause this dude and a few others here jumped on me when i questioned your choice to follow something you didnt understand and even showed you how he was wrong multiple times.
maybe you ought to have convos without letting emotion influence perception of fact.
thx for the groundbreaking advice. this is a forum and the point here is to help eachother make money. we can do that in more ways than posting picks
lmao. i know the lakeshow covered last night. thats why i bumped this.
i started here to help, not as a troll. now i troll cause this dude and a few others here jumped on me when i questioned your choice to follow something you didnt understand and even showed you how he was wrong multiple times.
maybe you ought to have convos without letting emotion influence perception of fact.
thx for the groundbreaking advice. this is a forum and the point here is to help eachother make money. we can do that in more ways than posting picks
grit out
I know personally i like to post my own picks and see what matches with other cappers. This lets me know that i am not the only thinking it. I don't know what people systems are so if their system matches mine. It makes me feel more comfortable with my picks. Like today i posted 6 plays 3 in NBA and 3 in NCAAB. I have had a few matches with other cappers so that makes me fell better about those picks. We knew the code was written wrong as aussie stated on the first page. Then you came around telling us but you could not explain the t, so how could we truly trust what you said. If youbare here to help. Help if not why troll.
0
Quote Originally Posted by monstergrit:
lmao. i know the lakeshow covered last night. thats why i bumped this.
i started here to help, not as a troll. now i troll cause this dude and a few others here jumped on me when i questioned your choice to follow something you didnt understand and even showed you how he was wrong multiple times.
maybe you ought to have convos without letting emotion influence perception of fact.
thx for the groundbreaking advice. this is a forum and the point here is to help eachother make money. we can do that in more ways than posting picks
grit out
I know personally i like to post my own picks and see what matches with other cappers. This lets me know that i am not the only thinking it. I don't know what people systems are so if their system matches mine. It makes me feel more comfortable with my picks. Like today i posted 6 plays 3 in NBA and 3 in NCAAB. I have had a few matches with other cappers so that makes me fell better about those picks. We knew the code was written wrong as aussie stated on the first page. Then you came around telling us but you could not explain the t, so how could we truly trust what you said. If youbare here to help. Help if not why troll.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.