3/22 (3/21 U.S.)
Orlando Magic -12.5 56% $42 (2-star)
Orlando Magic Under 194.5 58.4% $94 (2-star)
Memphis Over 203.5 55.1% $60 (4-star)
Memphis Grizzlies -8 50.9% $40 (3-star)
Goldenstate Over 210.5 56.3% $48 (2-star)
Denver Nuggets Over 214.5 56.5% $53 (3-star)
Accuscore Record to Date (March):
ATS: 32-27-0 $597.60
Totals: 45-27-0 $512.05
Overall: 77-54-0 58.78% $1109.65
I initially started playing only the games with a high enough percentage to give me an edge but recently started playing all the 3 to 4 star plays even though there is no edge. Conversely, I will all any and all of their high percentage plays that give me an edge even though there is only 1 or 2 stars next to the pick.
Accuscore boasts a 82-37, 68.9% +1920 streak on all NBA 3-and-4 Star picks to date.
I know that I should separate the high percentage plays that I'm playing in accordance with the Kelly criterion from the 3 and 4-star plays, but it's enough work as it is.
Note to everyone: While the amount of dollars bet or lost may the most visible aspect of any betting system, look carefully at the winning percentages and the number of games bet. So far, Accuscore has produced a winning percentage of 58.78% over the course of 131 games. But 131 games is too small of a sample size to determine the degree of success Accuscore will produce over the long run.
Consider this excerpt from a book that I read on sports betting.
"Studies in statistical significance show that if a betting system is producing better than a 57% winning percentage, statistical significance for a result of 55% can be proven over the course of 2000 games. In other words, if a system produces a 57% winning percentage over the course of 2,000 games, there is a 95% probability that the actual winning results will equal or exceed 55% in the long run."
Give me 55% and I won't pay Accuscore $100 a month, I'll pay them $1000.
I initially started playing only the games with a high enough percentage to give me an edge but recently started playing all the 3 to 4 star plays even though there is no edge. Conversely, I will all any and all of their high percentage plays that give me an edge even though there is only 1 or 2 stars next to the pick.
Accuscore boasts a 82-37, 68.9% +1920 streak on all NBA 3-and-4 Star picks to date.
I know that I should separate the high percentage plays that I'm playing in accordance with the Kelly criterion from the 3 and 4-star plays, but it's enough work as it is.
NBA: Points Spreads (Season) 496-439 53% +1310
NBA: Moneyline (Season) 728-313 69.9% +2499
NBA: 4 Star PS Past 30 Days: 14-10 58.3% +170
NBA: 3-Star PS Past 30 Days 16-13 55.2% +300
NBA: 4-Star O/U Past 30 days 22-15 59.5% +550
I don't see any season records on all star picks nor do I see the
season records on season totals, so I'm assuming it's negative. Who knows.
NBA: Points Spreads (Season) 496-439 53% +1310
NBA: Moneyline (Season) 728-313 69.9% +2499
NBA: 4 Star PS Past 30 Days: 14-10 58.3% +170
NBA: 3-Star PS Past 30 Days 16-13 55.2% +300
NBA: 4-Star O/U Past 30 days 22-15 59.5% +550
I don't see any season records on all star picks nor do I see the
season records on season totals, so I'm assuming it's negative. Who knows.
Final Card 3/22 (3/21 U.S.)
Orlando Magic -12.5 56% $42 (2-star)
Orlando Magic Under 194.5 58.4% $94 (2-star)
Memphis Over 203.5 55.1% $60 (4-star)
Memphis Grizzlies -8 50.9% $40 (3-star)
Goldenstate Over 210.5 56.3% $48 (2-star)
Denver Nuggets Over 214.5 56.5% $53 (3-star)
New Jersey +3 58.5% $96 (2-star)
Boston Celtics Over 197.5 54.6% $60 (4-star)
Sacramento Kings +15.5 60.1% $131 (1-star)
Sacramento Over 196.5 55.3% $27 (2-star)
Accuscore Record to Date (March):
ATS: 32-27-0 $597.60
Totals: 45-27-0 $512.05
Overall: 77-54-0 58.78% $1109.65
NBA: Points Spreads (Season) 496-439 53% +1310
NBA: Moneyline (Season) 728-313 69.9% +2499
NBA: 4 Star PS Past 30 Days: 14-10 58.3% +170
NBA: 3-Star PS Past 30 Days 16-13 55.2% +300
NBA: 4-Star O/U Past 30 days 22-15 59.5% +550
I don't see any season records on all star picks nor do I see the
season records on season totals, so I'm assuming it's negative. Who knows.
| Point Spread | |
| Sacramento Kings +15.5 | 51.4% |
| Chicago Bulls -15.5 | 48.5% |
| Over / Under | |
| OVR 196.5 | 56.2% |
| UND 196.5 | 43.7% |
| Money Line | |
| Sacramento Kings +2000 | 8.8% |
| Chicago Bulls -4500 | 91.1% |
| Point Spread | |
| Sacramento Kings +15.5 | 51.4% |
| Chicago Bulls -15.5 | 48.5% |
| Over / Under | |
| OVR 196.5 | 56.2% |
| UND 196.5 | 43.7% |
| Money Line | |
| Sacramento Kings +2000 | 8.8% |
| Chicago Bulls -4500 | 91.1% |
The Daily Line Report is posted no later than 12:00 Noon EST for games played that day. In most cases a preliminary Upcoming Game Report will be posted in the early hours of each day (3 am EST), but the information in this report is subject to change and it is not guaranteed to be available prior to Noon EST. MLB has significantly more games and player data to process than other sports requiring a different schedule for the DLR. Live Betting Predictions Data is updated when the DLR Upcoming Game Report is updated. However, the Vegas Odds which are refreshed every few minutes in the Live Betting Predictions are not refreshed in the DLR Report.
To answer your question, yes, Accuscore updates its percentages and data as the actual game time gets closer. Of course, not as often as the actual books or Vegas, but as the NBA games start early in the morning for me, I just follow their preliminary data. Also, the lines are a bit off on the Korean books when they release them so if I can hit the right lines early, it is better for me than trying to wait right before game time and beat the closing line.
Yes, I looked at it and it shows the YTD record on the season for each.team playing that day. As for the historical archives that anyone can access for free, it's not really an archive, just a paragraph for each sport extolling Accuscore's "phenomenal" record throughout the years.
Results 3/22 (3/21 U.S.)
Orlando Magic -12.5 -$42 
Orlando Magic Under 194.5 $79.9 
Memphis Over 203.5 -$60
Memphis Grizzlies -8 $34
Goldenstate Over 210.5 -$48
Denver Nuggets Over 214.5 -$53
New Jersey +3 -$96
Boston Celtics Over 197.5 -$60
Sacramento Kings +15.5 -$131
Sacramento Over 196.5 $22.95
Accuscore Record to Date (March):
ATS: 33-30-0 $362.60
Totals: 47-32-0 $394.35
Overall: 80-62-0 56.34% $756.95
3/24 (3/23 U.S.)
Atlanta Hawks +6.5 57.9% $83
Atlanta Under 190.5 58.5% $96
Detroit Pistons +8.5 55.4% $29
Detroit Under 199.5 57.5% $74
Boston Over 187 59.6% $120
Boston Celtics -6.5 58.8% $103
Sacramento Kings +8.5 57.9% $83
Toronto Over 209.5 56% $42
Sacramento Over 194.5 54.4% $7
Orlando Magic Over 203.5 57% $64
Denver Nuggets Under 211.5 53% $60 (4-Star Play)
Accuscore Record to Date (March):
ATS: 33-30-0 $362.60
Totals: 48-33-0 $394.75
Overall: 81-63-0 56.25% $757.35
No problem. Either $99 a month or $299 a year, but if you talk to them right, you can get a nice discount for the yearly subscription, like around $200 or maybe even less. For that price, I say it's definitely worth it.
It's very easy to follow, but a lot of people seem to misunderstand the Side Value/ML part of Accuscore. Too tired to explain what that is. I am using a Kelly betting critierion based on Accuscore's percentages to determine how much I should bet on each respective game. If you're not familiar with this concept or betting system, it is best to flat bet about 1-2% of your bankroll. Of course, if you have $1000 dollars, 10 to 20 dollars might seem a little too small, so of course you can increase your wager size if you're comfortable betting more.
"Studies in statistical significance show that if a betting system is producing better than a 57% winning percentage, statistical significance for a result of 55% can be proven over the course of 2000 games. In other words, if a system produces a 57% winning percentage over the course of 2,000 games, there is a 95% probability that the actual winning results will equal or exceed 55% in the long run."
Give me 55% and I won't pay Accuscore $100 a month, I'll pay them $1000.
Established in 1995,
Hot Forum Topics
