It almost looks like a decent play to just go straight up same units on all their plays. 87-68 is a decent percentage!
Yes 56.13% is a very decent percentage over the course of 155 games, but as we have seen throughout the past week or so, Accuscore has been very streaky, going up and down like a roller coaster, and the question is whether Accuscore can maintain at least a 55% winrate in the long run. For this month, I don't doubt it, but I'm not so confident yet for at least 1000-2000 plays.
0
Quote Originally Posted by minion0812:
It almost looks like a decent play to just go straight up same units on all their plays. 87-68 is a decent percentage!
Yes 56.13% is a very decent percentage over the course of 155 games, but as we have seen throughout the past week or so, Accuscore has been very streaky, going up and down like a roller coaster, and the question is whether Accuscore can maintain at least a 55% winrate in the long run. For this month, I don't doubt it, but I'm not so confident yet for at least 1000-2000 plays.
Original Poster, I have a record of roughly 1,000 props priced using the Accuscore Prop Analyzer. I sent you a friend request, PM me and let's exchange some information.
Spoiler alert. So far my conclusion is that accuscore isn't worth a damn nickel, but still let's discuss results.
0
Original Poster, I have a record of roughly 1,000 props priced using the Accuscore Prop Analyzer. I sent you a friend request, PM me and let's exchange some information.
Spoiler alert. So far my conclusion is that accuscore isn't worth a damn nickel, but still let's discuss results.
Original Poster, I have a record of roughly 1,000 props priced using the Accuscore Prop Analyzer. I sent you a friend request, PM me and let's exchange some information.
Spoiler alert. So far my conclusion is that accuscore isn't worth a damn nickel, but still let's discuss results.
Added. Will hit you up tomorrow. Gotta go to sleep now as it is 4 am over here, but on a quick note, yes, I too have my concerns about the long-term success rate of Accuscore. I mean, can it really be that easy picking winners at over 55% by just paying $99 a month? But I am still optimistic; there has to be a way to somehow incorporate Accuscore's stats/probabilities into a successful betting system. They must be doing something right if they've been around this long and are partnered up with Espn, CBS, etc...Who knows? GL
0
Quote Originally Posted by UsaSurfer:
Original Poster, I have a record of roughly 1,000 props priced using the Accuscore Prop Analyzer. I sent you a friend request, PM me and let's exchange some information.
Spoiler alert. So far my conclusion is that accuscore isn't worth a damn nickel, but still let's discuss results.
Added. Will hit you up tomorrow. Gotta go to sleep now as it is 4 am over here, but on a quick note, yes, I too have my concerns about the long-term success rate of Accuscore. I mean, can it really be that easy picking winners at over 55% by just paying $99 a month? But I am still optimistic; there has to be a way to somehow incorporate Accuscore's stats/probabilities into a successful betting system. They must be doing something right if they've been around this long and are partnered up with Espn, CBS, etc...Who knows? GL
Added. Will hit you up tomorrow. Gotta go to sleep now as it is 4 am over here, but on a quick note, yes, I too have my concerns about the long-term success rate of Accuscore. I mean, can it really be that easy picking winners at over 55% by just paying $99 a month? But I am still optimistic; there has to be a way to somehow incorporate Accuscore's stats/probabilities into a successful betting system. They must be doing something right if they've been around this long and are partnered up with Espn, CBS, etc...Who knows? GL
Yeah true that I would like to see as well and will certainly purchase if it looks okay. I have a feeling that they do really well at picking totals and perhaps sticking to that might be the best bet overall.
0
Quote Originally Posted by kpoutlaw:
Added. Will hit you up tomorrow. Gotta go to sleep now as it is 4 am over here, but on a quick note, yes, I too have my concerns about the long-term success rate of Accuscore. I mean, can it really be that easy picking winners at over 55% by just paying $99 a month? But I am still optimistic; there has to be a way to somehow incorporate Accuscore's stats/probabilities into a successful betting system. They must be doing something right if they've been around this long and are partnered up with Espn, CBS, etc...Who knows? GL
Yeah true that I would like to see as well and will certainly purchase if it looks okay. I have a feeling that they do really well at picking totals and perhaps sticking to that might be the best bet overall.
Here are my sentiments on Accuscore.. NOT WORTH THE $$.. for one thing, you CANNOT trust their advertised records. I was using them for various systems.. and I couldn't figure out why games they showed as winners, I was losing on. For example, in MLB, in some instances, not all, but enough to make a significant impact on dollars W and L, when they came out with their Daily Line Report, the lines they were using to record their success, were not even close to the actual closing line, which if you were using the SV value, directly impacted who you would be taking. Same way in basketball, Accuscore's closing lines for some games were way off. The other thing they are good at, is the "after the fact" crap. They they may be 17-4 in Big East Basketball.. kudo's to the person that knew that before the season. I used them for 2 years.. save the money.
0
Here are my sentiments on Accuscore.. NOT WORTH THE $$.. for one thing, you CANNOT trust their advertised records. I was using them for various systems.. and I couldn't figure out why games they showed as winners, I was losing on. For example, in MLB, in some instances, not all, but enough to make a significant impact on dollars W and L, when they came out with their Daily Line Report, the lines they were using to record their success, were not even close to the actual closing line, which if you were using the SV value, directly impacted who you would be taking. Same way in basketball, Accuscore's closing lines for some games were way off. The other thing they are good at, is the "after the fact" crap. They they may be 17-4 in Big East Basketball.. kudo's to the person that knew that before the season. I used them for 2 years.. save the money.
I emailed them asking about their record keeping. Specifically, I wanted to know their records -- in each sport -- for each "star rated" system. For example, what is their record for the entire NBA season on 3-star plays? Or, their record for the entire CBB season for 4-star plays? Simple enough.
They were very evasive. Here is what they wrote:
As
for keeping the star rating picks in our daily line report, we do not
keep them. We do post them in the more trends section. The star ratings are based on teams and their records with the
AccuScore computer over the season.
They couldn't answer my question. They post their "recent trends" but claim not to keep records for each sport, by "star rated" pick.
I don't trust them, but find this thread interesting anyway. Keep it up.
0
I emailed them asking about their record keeping. Specifically, I wanted to know their records -- in each sport -- for each "star rated" system. For example, what is their record for the entire NBA season on 3-star plays? Or, their record for the entire CBB season for 4-star plays? Simple enough.
They were very evasive. Here is what they wrote:
As
for keeping the star rating picks in our daily line report, we do not
keep them. We do post them in the more trends section. The star ratings are based on teams and their records with the
AccuScore computer over the season.
They couldn't answer my question. They post their "recent trends" but claim not to keep records for each sport, by "star rated" pick.
I don't trust them, but find this thread interesting anyway. Keep it up.
Here are my sentiments on Accuscore.. NOT WORTH THE $$.. for one thing, you CANNOT trust their advertised records. I was using them for various systems.. and I couldn't figure out why games they showed as winners, I was losing on. For example, in MLB, in some instances, not all, but enough to make a significant impact on dollars W and L, when they came out with their Daily Line Report, the lines they were using to record their success, were not even close to the actual closing line, which if you were using the SV value, directly impacted who you would be taking. Same way in basketball, Accuscore's closing lines for some games were way off. The other thing they are good at, is the "after the fact" crap. They they may be 17-4 in Big East Basketball.. kudo's to the person that knew that before the season. I used them for 2 years.. save the money.
If it don't make money, it don't make sense.
0
Quote Originally Posted by ctrapper:
Here are my sentiments on Accuscore.. NOT WORTH THE $$.. for one thing, you CANNOT trust their advertised records. I was using them for various systems.. and I couldn't figure out why games they showed as winners, I was losing on. For example, in MLB, in some instances, not all, but enough to make a significant impact on dollars W and L, when they came out with their Daily Line Report, the lines they were using to record their success, were not even close to the actual closing line, which if you were using the SV value, directly impacted who you would be taking. Same way in basketball, Accuscore's closing lines for some games were way off. The other thing they are good at, is the "after the fact" crap. They they may be 17-4 in Big East Basketball.. kudo's to the person that knew that before the season. I used them for 2 years.. save the money.
I emailed them asking about their record keeping. Specifically, I wanted to know their records -- in each sport -- for each "star rated" system. For example, what is their record for the entire NBA season on 3-star plays? Or, their record for the entire CBB season for 4-star plays? Simple enough.
They were very evasive. Here is what they wrote:
As for keeping the star rating picks in our daily line report, we do not keep them. We do post them in the more trends section. The star ratings are based on teams and their records with the AccuScore computer over the season.
They couldn't answer my question. They post their "recent trends" but claim not to keep records for each sport, by "star rated" pick.
I don't trust them, but find this thread interesting anyway. Keep it up.
You shouldn't trust any system/service that sells its picks online completely, but we shall see.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Mike_NYC:
I emailed them asking about their record keeping. Specifically, I wanted to know their records -- in each sport -- for each "star rated" system. For example, what is their record for the entire NBA season on 3-star plays? Or, their record for the entire CBB season for 4-star plays? Simple enough.
They were very evasive. Here is what they wrote:
As for keeping the star rating picks in our daily line report, we do not keep them. We do post them in the more trends section. The star ratings are based on teams and their records with the AccuScore computer over the season.
They couldn't answer my question. They post their "recent trends" but claim not to keep records for each sport, by "star rated" pick.
I don't trust them, but find this thread interesting anyway. Keep it up.
You shouldn't trust any system/service that sells its picks online completely, but we shall see.
I HAVE ACCUSCORE...AND YES THEY GOT ME ON THAT PACERS GAME.....THEY SAID PACERS WILL WIN....111.8 TO 101...I SAY THEY ARE REALLY GOOD IN BASEBALL...BEEN WIT THEM FOR 3 YEARS......I PAY 100 A YEAR.....NEVER 99 A MONTH......
0
I HAVE ACCUSCORE...AND YES THEY GOT ME ON THAT PACERS GAME.....THEY SAID PACERS WILL WIN....111.8 TO 101...I SAY THEY ARE REALLY GOOD IN BASEBALL...BEEN WIT THEM FOR 3 YEARS......I PAY 100 A YEAR.....NEVER 99 A MONTH......
TODAY THEY SAY THAT I LIKE...UCONN 74 ZONA 70+1.5= 71.5...UCONN......IONA 74 ETS 70+1.5=71.5...IONA....BUTLER 68...FLORIDA 68...IAM TAKING BUTLER PLUS THE 4....SEE WHAT HAPPENS TODAY.....GL2A OF U$
0
TODAY THEY SAY THAT I LIKE...UCONN 74 ZONA 70+1.5= 71.5...UCONN......IONA 74 ETS 70+1.5=71.5...IONA....BUTLER 68...FLORIDA 68...IAM TAKING BUTLER PLUS THE 4....SEE WHAT HAPPENS TODAY.....GL2A OF U$
I just signed up for accuscore...just wondering if its smart to bet just the 4 star games at a flat rate of 1unit per bet...im gonna play every sport they cover (nba, ncaa, nfl, mlb, nhl) so i need to find a system that is efficient instead of playing 20-25 bets a night and getting sucked dry by the juice....anyone have any insights? Thanks! Great thread btw...
0
I just signed up for accuscore...just wondering if its smart to bet just the 4 star games at a flat rate of 1unit per bet...im gonna play every sport they cover (nba, ncaa, nfl, mlb, nhl) so i need to find a system that is efficient instead of playing 20-25 bets a night and getting sucked dry by the juice....anyone have any insights? Thanks! Great thread btw...
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Hot Forum Topics
