All Forums | NBA Betting

Confused

Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 451
Posts: 10
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 5265
Posted: #1
Blake got Technical at the end of the third quarter and GSW got a ft starting  the 4th quarter along with flag foul by gsw...

Same shit happened 3 mins later or something so Blake got his second Technical and got tossed but only Clippers get to shoot fts for the Flag foul by gsw. How come GSW didn't get a ft like they did earlier for Blake 2nd T......or did i miss it...interesting....
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2007
Posts: 36739
Posted: #2
Double technicals the 2nd time I believe
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2012
Posts: 2486
Posted: #3
I was thinking the same thing after hollins shot the fts
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2009
Posts: 27785
Posted: #4

Bogut and Griffin got T'd up at the same time, they cancel each other up.

The refs in the end got what they wanted.

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2012
Posts: 2486
Posted: #5
It was a flagrant 1 for bogut the second time
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 5265
Posted: #6
nvm got it...apparently Green Flag foul was type 2 which =2 T's while Bogot only Flag Type 1= 1 T so it cancelled out.....weird behind rule...

still a bs ending one possession game and no score in last minute
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2012
Posts: 2486
Posted: #7
But why did hollins shoot two freethrows if they were supposed to cancel each other out?
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2004
Posts: 3253
Posted: #8
the call was a flagrant 1 on Bogut and a tech on Griffin. Using the precedent set 3 minutes earlier, the Clips should've had 2 fts and possession after a tech ft by GSW, although for some reason, it never happened.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2012
Posts: 2486
Posted: #9
Quote Originally Posted by wallet:

the call was a flagrant 1 on Bogut and a tech on Griffin. Using the precedent set 3 minutes earlier, the Clips should've had 2 fts and possession after a tech ft by GSW, although for some reason, it never happened.
yep just another screw up by the refs tonight..
 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2004
Posts: 3253
Posted: #10
The difference between the flagrant 2 on Green and Flagrant 1 on Bogut should not have affected the fts that should've been awarded to GSW because of each of Griffin's techs. The only difference between a flagrant 1 and 2 is that the latter gets you ejected, but the number of freethrows awarded to an opponent is the same
All Forums | NBA Betting
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.