Good thread, good posts, good read.
When you get back to the basic rationale for a line, is it not about minimizing risk/exposure for the book? Granted there are formulas and rules of thumb (8.5-10pt swing) but isn't it in the books best interest to lay down a line that best regulates sharp money while at the same time splits the public handle dead nuts to the dollar, granting the book a full 10% hold?
Furthermore, isnt it our primary task to find the error in a line and to take advantage of it?. In looking at line accuracy in Miami's six playoff games, the line was relatively tight in game 2 vs. MIL... line was -14.5 margin of victory (mov) was 12. And game 4 vs MIL mov was 11 vs a line of -8.5
The above references indicate the book has been 'tight' only 33% of the time (2 of 6 games) on Miami. The book knows Miami is a public favorite with a 5-1 record vs the line, and Chicago has captured the nations eye with their play but are only sporting a 5-4 vs the line...some adjustments need to be made to balance the handle IMO
Good thread, good posts, good read.
When you get back to the basic rationale for a line, is it not about minimizing risk/exposure for the book? Granted there are formulas and rules of thumb (8.5-10pt swing) but isn't it in the books best interest to lay down a line that best regulates sharp money while at the same time splits the public handle dead nuts to the dollar, granting the book a full 10% hold?
Furthermore, isnt it our primary task to find the error in a line and to take advantage of it?. In looking at line accuracy in Miami's six playoff games, the line was relatively tight in game 2 vs. MIL... line was -14.5 margin of victory (mov) was 12. And game 4 vs MIL mov was 11 vs a line of -8.5
The above references indicate the book has been 'tight' only 33% of the time (2 of 6 games) on Miami. The book knows Miami is a public favorite with a 5-1 record vs the line, and Chicago has captured the nations eye with their play but are only sporting a 5-4 vs the line...some adjustments need to be made to balance the handle IMO
Yes you are getting ripped off taking Miami and yes you are getting a bargain taking Chicago.
I think making Miami -4.5 or -5 today, that line would've gotten pounded by the public.
Open it at -7.5 and you get some hesitation. Don't books love hesitation? All the people that want to take Miami are thinking, crap man win by 8. That's a lot. On the other side, after watching Chicago get crushed by 40 is 8 enough? Doesn't feel very good getting 8.
The last game is the one everyone remembers.
Emotion aside, just logical thinking, my money would be on Chicago today. But I don't have to play it so I'll pass. See what halftime looks like.
Yes you are getting ripped off taking Miami and yes you are getting a bargain taking Chicago.
I think making Miami -4.5 or -5 today, that line would've gotten pounded by the public.
Open it at -7.5 and you get some hesitation. Don't books love hesitation? All the people that want to take Miami are thinking, crap man win by 8. That's a lot. On the other side, after watching Chicago get crushed by 40 is 8 enough? Doesn't feel very good getting 8.
The last game is the one everyone remembers.
Emotion aside, just logical thinking, my money would be on Chicago today. But I don't have to play it so I'll pass. See what halftime looks like.
[/Quote]
Ok Scal...so is this the perfect # for this game or what? Bulls backers as well as the Heat backers are happy as clams. As of 2:19 p Vegas has Miami -8.5 (at the property I have an acct. with) and that # has been stable for a bit.
Next up IMO is Thibodeau, his clydsdales and 30-36 fouls to give vs. Spolestra, his thouroughbreds and the birdman.
What do you think the leagues instructions to the officiating crew will be? Let 'em play...or keep 'em on a short leash?
[/Quote]
Ok Scal...so is this the perfect # for this game or what? Bulls backers as well as the Heat backers are happy as clams. As of 2:19 p Vegas has Miami -8.5 (at the property I have an acct. with) and that # has been stable for a bit.
Next up IMO is Thibodeau, his clydsdales and 30-36 fouls to give vs. Spolestra, his thouroughbreds and the birdman.
What do you think the leagues instructions to the officiating crew will be? Let 'em play...or keep 'em on a short leash?
Ok Scal...so is this the perfect # for this game or what? Bulls backers as well as the Heat backers are happy as clams. As of 2:19 p Vegas has Miami -8.5 (at the property I have an acct. with) and that # has been stable for a bit.
Next up IMO is Thibodeau, his clydsdales and 30-36 fouls to give vs. Spolestra, his thouroughbreds and the birdman.
What do you think the leagues instructions to the officiating crew will be? Let 'em play...or keep 'em on a short leash?
Ok Scal...so is this the perfect # for this game or what? Bulls backers as well as the Heat backers are happy as clams. As of 2:19 p Vegas has Miami -8.5 (at the property I have an acct. with) and that # has been stable for a bit.
Next up IMO is Thibodeau, his clydsdales and 30-36 fouls to give vs. Spolestra, his thouroughbreds and the birdman.
What do you think the leagues instructions to the officiating crew will be? Let 'em play...or keep 'em on a short leash?
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.