Your obviously nothing more than a nerdy bookworm. Maybe its time to get your head out of the shelves of the local library and actually (visually) watch and observe what makes a team tick. Stats are surely important but there are times when you need to exit your smoked filled room and turn on some games and watch whats not written on paper. Funny how when ppl respond with their opinions on this game, you react in the insulting manner of a spoiled brat. Look, I can't help if you were the blunt of jokes in school, but really please don't think now is the time to extract revenge and try to tell others how to cap a game. If you ask for opinions and insight then accept it that may not always be of your liking. Some, like a few of your sheep, might believe that trying to be an ENSTEIN is the way to cap a game, others are not of that opinion. Plain old common sense goes a long way in capping a game.
Says a likely regular loser. I am not a fan of these 10 page writeups either, but god damn, stfu,
0
Quote Originally Posted by golfing123:
Your obviously nothing more than a nerdy bookworm. Maybe its time to get your head out of the shelves of the local library and actually (visually) watch and observe what makes a team tick. Stats are surely important but there are times when you need to exit your smoked filled room and turn on some games and watch whats not written on paper. Funny how when ppl respond with their opinions on this game, you react in the insulting manner of a spoiled brat. Look, I can't help if you were the blunt of jokes in school, but really please don't think now is the time to extract revenge and try to tell others how to cap a game. If you ask for opinions and insight then accept it that may not always be of your liking. Some, like a few of your sheep, might believe that trying to be an ENSTEIN is the way to cap a game, others are not of that opinion. Plain old common sense goes a long way in capping a game.
Says a likely regular loser. I am not a fan of these 10 page writeups either, but god damn, stfu,
Chandler over pts + reb is 22.5 as stated in the OP if anyone is interested.
The guy had 25 rebounds ALONE last Knicks game. So if you don't like the Knicks side the Chandler over prop is there for the taking. Not going to do a write up on a prop bet as guys here wouldn't care so why write it up. Apparently they care not about a write up either except to bash it.
Sick people on this site. Sick and miserable people.
Wondering what it's like to grow up in a household with some of them.
Pure misery is all I can think of.
0
Chandler over pts + reb is 22.5 as stated in the OP if anyone is interested.
The guy had 25 rebounds ALONE last Knicks game. So if you don't like the Knicks side the Chandler over prop is there for the taking. Not going to do a write up on a prop bet as guys here wouldn't care so why write it up. Apparently they care not about a write up either except to bash it.
Sick people on this site. Sick and miserable people.
Wondering what it's like to grow up in a household with some of them.
You have been challenged // Thread is in the PB.. if you dont show up , everyone will assume you are not a capper and a troll... Thanks Let me know when you have a pick..
0
Quote Originally Posted by Bizzey:
One word eh? friggin genius.
Whats your pick???
where are your winners???
You have been challenged // Thread is in the PB.. if you dont show up , everyone will assume you are not a capper and a troll... Thanks Let me know when you have a pick..
How much time do you have on your hands Scal?? Those write-ups are insane...best of luck to ya man, but I consulted my magic 8 ball and it said to ride the Nazi and his super soldiers...Dirk -7.5 in a 15+pt win.
0
How much time do you have on your hands Scal?? Those write-ups are insane...best of luck to ya man, but I consulted my magic 8 ball and it said to ride the Nazi and his super soldiers...Dirk -7.5 in a 15+pt win.
How much time do you have on your hands Scal?? Those write-ups are insane...best of luck to ya man, but I consulted my magic 8 ball and it said to ride the Nazi and his super soldiers...Dirk -7.5 in a 15+pt win.
You're asking the wrong guy.
It takes a lot less time to write that up than to troll this site for hours waiting for that very write-up and bash it.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Rauchy76:
How much time do you have on your hands Scal?? Those write-ups are insane...best of luck to ya man, but I consulted my magic 8 ball and it said to ride the Nazi and his super soldiers...Dirk -7.5 in a 15+pt win.
You're asking the wrong guy.
It takes a lot less time to write that up than to troll this site for hours waiting for that very write-up and bash it.
lol another loser. a loser standing up for another loser HAHAHHAHA
I been trying to tail your picks but you've never had one. I can't blame you, you don't have any money I'm sure and live in your parents basement. Probably one of those guys that plays poker and uses peanuts instead of real money. Stop being a total shaft.
0
Quote Originally Posted by duosduo:
lol another loser. a loser standing up for another loser HAHAHHAHA
I been trying to tail your picks but you've never had one. I can't blame you, you don't have any money I'm sure and live in your parents basement. Probably one of those guys that plays poker and uses peanuts instead of real money. Stop being a total shaft.
NBA Record: 5-8 I'm taking a break but Dallas only plays the Knicks twice a year, this being the last time they play so I have to dip my feet into this one. Why the interest? 1. The Trade ...The trade that sent Tyson Chandler to Dallas and brought back Calderon, Dalembert and Larkin. Folks, the Knicks don't have much to go with concerning their lineup. Shumpert is gone. JR is questionable and probably won't go. So we need the bodies on the floor that we have to score. Can we depend on them? Well, we have to look to Calderon, Dalembert and Larkin, the ex-Mavs to step up against their former team. In a 109-102 OT loss on 11/26, did those three step up? Calderon averages 8p/4a/3r. The game vs. his former team? Off the charts.. 21points; 10!!! rebounds; 4 assists; 7-9 from 3! Dalembert averages 4p/5a/1r. The game vs. his former team? For him, damn good! 13 pts 13 Rebounds 2 steals 2 blocks. BOTH these guys stepped up in a big way and propelled the Knicks to OT in Dallas as FOURTEEN point dogs eventually losing by 7. So we need BOTH to step up in a big way again in this game. Larkin? No discernable difference between his averages and this game. Here is one problem. Dalembert has been so brutal of late, he is now coming off the bench. Still, I really hope Fisher sees that he will want to perform against his former team and did in a big way the last game. If he does not give him the start, it will be a problem. That is another unknown, along with JR's status that messes with this pick. 2. Tyson Chandler Well if Dalembert and Calderon stepped up, you must be wondering about how Chandler did last game. He's averages 10p/11r/1block That night...OFF THE CHARTS. 17pts 25 Rebounds! and 2 blocks and one steal. So in some regard Tyson's play neutralized the step up games of Jose and Samuel. 3. So how did the Knicks go into OT with the Mavs last game and get the cover? Because the Mavs were running plays through Chandler. Right from the get-go, Dirk was deferring to Chandler on offense. Yes, Dirk. This lead to a breakdown in many plays, lots of iso's underneath and short jumpers for Tyson and it couldn't be sustained over the course of the game, keeping the Knicks in it. Combine this with Calderon and Dalembert and the nights they had and you get a game that goes to OT. So what will the Mavs do tonight? It's important because if the Mavs play their up-tempo offense and move away from Tyson and what they did last game, they have a much better shot at covering this number. Two thoughts: 1) Carlisle is smart and will realize that the Knicks are terrible but deferring to Chandler puts the game in jeopardy. 2) Chandler overrides any intention of his coach (if there is even any intention in the first place and their should be) and demands the ball continuously on offense to fill up his box score and burn the Knicks in his old stomping grounds where he was unceremoniously dismissed. Make no mistake, the veiled shots at Chandler from the Knicks last season were many by coaches, media and players. It is a dream come true for Tyson to be with the team he won a championship with and he will be looking forward to his MSG return in a BIG WAY far more than the game in Dallas. That is why I suggest looking at Chandler props along with Calderon (Dalembert) props are a stretch.
Wow this is a nice write up you must have a lot of tome.
0
Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:
NBA Record: 5-8 I'm taking a break but Dallas only plays the Knicks twice a year, this being the last time they play so I have to dip my feet into this one. Why the interest? 1. The Trade ...The trade that sent Tyson Chandler to Dallas and brought back Calderon, Dalembert and Larkin. Folks, the Knicks don't have much to go with concerning their lineup. Shumpert is gone. JR is questionable and probably won't go. So we need the bodies on the floor that we have to score. Can we depend on them? Well, we have to look to Calderon, Dalembert and Larkin, the ex-Mavs to step up against their former team. In a 109-102 OT loss on 11/26, did those three step up? Calderon averages 8p/4a/3r. The game vs. his former team? Off the charts.. 21points; 10!!! rebounds; 4 assists; 7-9 from 3! Dalembert averages 4p/5a/1r. The game vs. his former team? For him, damn good! 13 pts 13 Rebounds 2 steals 2 blocks. BOTH these guys stepped up in a big way and propelled the Knicks to OT in Dallas as FOURTEEN point dogs eventually losing by 7. So we need BOTH to step up in a big way again in this game. Larkin? No discernable difference between his averages and this game. Here is one problem. Dalembert has been so brutal of late, he is now coming off the bench. Still, I really hope Fisher sees that he will want to perform against his former team and did in a big way the last game. If he does not give him the start, it will be a problem. That is another unknown, along with JR's status that messes with this pick. 2. Tyson Chandler Well if Dalembert and Calderon stepped up, you must be wondering about how Chandler did last game. He's averages 10p/11r/1block That night...OFF THE CHARTS. 17pts 25 Rebounds! and 2 blocks and one steal. So in some regard Tyson's play neutralized the step up games of Jose and Samuel. 3. So how did the Knicks go into OT with the Mavs last game and get the cover? Because the Mavs were running plays through Chandler. Right from the get-go, Dirk was deferring to Chandler on offense. Yes, Dirk. This lead to a breakdown in many plays, lots of iso's underneath and short jumpers for Tyson and it couldn't be sustained over the course of the game, keeping the Knicks in it. Combine this with Calderon and Dalembert and the nights they had and you get a game that goes to OT. So what will the Mavs do tonight? It's important because if the Mavs play their up-tempo offense and move away from Tyson and what they did last game, they have a much better shot at covering this number. Two thoughts: 1) Carlisle is smart and will realize that the Knicks are terrible but deferring to Chandler puts the game in jeopardy. 2) Chandler overrides any intention of his coach (if there is even any intention in the first place and their should be) and demands the ball continuously on offense to fill up his box score and burn the Knicks in his old stomping grounds where he was unceremoniously dismissed. Make no mistake, the veiled shots at Chandler from the Knicks last season were many by coaches, media and players. It is a dream come true for Tyson to be with the team he won a championship with and he will be looking forward to his MSG return in a BIG WAY far more than the game in Dallas. That is why I suggest looking at Chandler props along with Calderon (Dalembert) props are a stretch.
Wow this is a nice write up you must have a lot of tome.
oh cool i posted my wiz bet somewhere, also took it with Minn TT first half under 46.5, sometimes you can split the bet into 2 to reduce variance when they are correlated
0
oh cool i posted my wiz bet somewhere, also took it with Minn TT first half under 46.5, sometimes you can split the bet into 2 to reduce variance when they are correlated
Normally i dont like seeing anyone lose money but i ave told this moron millions of times to stay away for garbage teams but yet he seems to love that little + symbol next to them , you deserve to lose every last dollar you have
0
Normally i dont like seeing anyone lose money but i ave told this moron millions of times to stay away for garbage teams but yet he seems to love that little + symbol next to them , you deserve to lose every last dollar you have
In post #54 I had a rebuttal to your original lean. Now because it disagreed with yours you decided to spew your childish venom as most figured you would. You want to call ppl sick, look no further than your mirror. An honest rebuttal turns into a mass of name calling caused only by the reputation that presides you. Sorry for you that you feel so slighted by a difference in opinion that you asked for to begin with. Even your teenage minions cannot protect your rep. Just saying why should anyone offer an opinion if your only gonna act a fool.
0
In post #54 I had a rebuttal to your original lean. Now because it disagreed with yours you decided to spew your childish venom as most figured you would. You want to call ppl sick, look no further than your mirror. An honest rebuttal turns into a mass of name calling caused only by the reputation that presides you. Sorry for you that you feel so slighted by a difference in opinion that you asked for to begin with. Even your teenage minions cannot protect your rep. Just saying why should anyone offer an opinion if your only gonna act a fool.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Hot Forum Topics
