Nice stats and officiating angles. For me, the Under is the play simply because Chicago lost their last game to a lowly PHX squad. Thib will go back and emphasize their bread and butter - Defense - since they cannot count on the same scoring night in, night out. But they can count on their defense.
Besides that - when these 2 get together in Chicago last several it goes under.
Under 184 - best of luck
Nice stats and officiating angles. For me, the Under is the play simply because Chicago lost their last game to a lowly PHX squad. Thib will go back and emphasize their bread and butter - Defense - since they cannot count on the same scoring night in, night out. But they can count on their defense.
Besides that - when these 2 get together in Chicago last several it goes under.
Under 184 - best of luck
Nice stats and officiating angles. For me, the Under is the play simply because Chicago lost their last game to a lowly PHX squad. Thib will go back and emphasize their bread and butter - Defense - since they cannot count on the same scoring night in, night out. But they can count on their defense.
Besides that - when these 2 get together in Chicago last several it goes under.
Under 184 - best of luck
Nice stats and officiating angles. For me, the Under is the play simply because Chicago lost their last game to a lowly PHX squad. Thib will go back and emphasize their bread and butter - Defense - since they cannot count on the same scoring night in, night out. But they can count on their defense.
Besides that - when these 2 get together in Chicago last several it goes under.
Under 184 - best of luck
Like the stat-driven analysis but you may be missing one important aspect when using those numbers. Your home and road PPG stats are very helpful, but those are averages and include games against defensively weak teams. Both CHI and ATL play above average defense statistically, with ATL being slightly above average and CHI being one of the best in the league. So you have to adjust those numbers downward to account for the better than average defenses.
Similarly, you've can't just look at the referee's numbers compared to the team's numbers. You've got to look at their averages in relation to league averages. League average scoring per game is right around 195, so you've got two ref's that right around the average and one ref that is higher than average. To me, this would justify perhaps a small increase in the expected number of points but not anything significant.
Like the stat-driven analysis but you may be missing one important aspect when using those numbers. Your home and road PPG stats are very helpful, but those are averages and include games against defensively weak teams. Both CHI and ATL play above average defense statistically, with ATL being slightly above average and CHI being one of the best in the league. So you have to adjust those numbers downward to account for the better than average defenses.
Similarly, you've can't just look at the referee's numbers compared to the team's numbers. You've got to look at their averages in relation to league averages. League average scoring per game is right around 195, so you've got two ref's that right around the average and one ref that is higher than average. To me, this would justify perhaps a small increase in the expected number of points but not anything significant.
Like the stat-driven analysis but you may be missing one important aspect when using those numbers. Your home and road PPG stats are very helpful, but those are averages and include games against defensively weak teams. Both CHI and ATL play above average defense statistically, with ATL being slightly above average and CHI being one of the best in the league. So you have to adjust those numbers downward to account for the better than average defenses.
Similarly, you've can't just look at the referee's numbers compared to the team's numbers. You've got to look at their averages in relation to league averages. League average scoring per game is right around 195, so you've got two ref's that right around the average and one ref that is higher than average. To me, this would justify perhaps a small increase in the expected number of points but not anything significant.
Like the stat-driven analysis but you may be missing one important aspect when using those numbers. Your home and road PPG stats are very helpful, but those are averages and include games against defensively weak teams. Both CHI and ATL play above average defense statistically, with ATL being slightly above average and CHI being one of the best in the league. So you have to adjust those numbers downward to account for the better than average defenses.
Similarly, you've can't just look at the referee's numbers compared to the team's numbers. You've got to look at their averages in relation to league averages. League average scoring per game is right around 195, so you've got two ref's that right around the average and one ref that is higher than average. To me, this would justify perhaps a small increase in the expected number of points but not anything significant.
POD = Under Magic =194 $7,700 to win $7,000
POD = Bulls -4 $3,300 to win $3,300
POD = Mavericks -7 $3,300 to win $3,0002 Team Parlay Action Revers $3,000 to win $12,000
Under Magic=194
Magic +2
2 Team Parlay Action Revers $3,000 to win $12,000
Mavericks -7
POD = Under Magic =194 $7,700 to win $7,000
POD = Bulls -4 $3,300 to win $3,300
POD = Mavericks -7 $3,300 to win $3,0002 Team Parlay Action Revers $3,000 to win $12,000
Under Magic=194
Magic +2
2 Team Parlay Action Revers $3,000 to win $12,000
Mavericks -7
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.