If the jazz line moved from 5.5 to 3.5 it means that the public is pounding the other team not jazz. If public was pounding jazz the line would go up to like 6.0-6.5 to verify someone who posted that. Can't quote on my phone :(
0
If the jazz line moved from 5.5 to 3.5 it means that the public is pounding the other team not jazz. If public was pounding jazz the line would go up to like 6.0-6.5 to verify someone who posted that. Can't quote on my phone :(
If the jazz line moved from 5.5 to 3.5 it means that the public is pounding the other team not jazz. If public was pounding jazz the line would go up to like 6.0-6.5 to verify someone who posted that. Can't quote on my phone :(
Thanks! That was me! On my mobile I cant even capitalize in the forum.
Thats what I was hoping with the line movement, I feel even stronger on the Utah play now. Hopefully if Vegas cleans house I go with them!
0
Quote Originally Posted by aleiverson02:
If the jazz line moved from 5.5 to 3.5 it means that the public is pounding the other team not jazz. If public was pounding jazz the line would go up to like 6.0-6.5 to verify someone who posted that. Can't quote on my phone :(
Thanks! That was me! On my mobile I cant even capitalize in the forum.
Thats what I was hoping with the line movement, I feel even stronger on the Utah play now. Hopefully if Vegas cleans house I go with them!
I'm new here and have been following all your plays for the past 2 weeks. Even though I'm not happy with the losing streak, I still have faith in you and will continue to follow your plays man. Lets bounce back this week.
I notice u split your plays up with early and late. Can you post the early and late plays together because my local closes for the night.
0
Kkid,
I'm new here and have been following all your plays for the past 2 weeks. Even though I'm not happy with the losing streak, I still have faith in you and will continue to follow your plays man. Lets bounce back this week.
I notice u split your plays up with early and late. Can you post the early and late plays together because my local closes for the night.
KK, ive been doing some totals work this morning....ambitious, not lazy as usual!! LOL and i am looking hard at OVER 184 in the ATL/CHI game... here is what i am analyzing... first the officiating crew main official ken mauer avg pts scored in his games as lead official 193.8 the crew rodney mott 194.6 and steve anderson 205.4, though in only 7 games officiated... that averages to197.93 ppg for this crew . ...looking at ATL avg of combined pts for both teams, its 192 and 185.5 for CHI, avg for the 2 teams 188.9...so the official avg is 197.93 and game avg for these 2 teams is 188.9 with a total set at 184.... both these teams have O/U records strongly to the under chi 14-21 and Atl 17-18, but due to the officiating trends and team averages for scoring, i will be on over 184 in the atl/chi game...
0
KK, ive been doing some totals work this morning....ambitious, not lazy as usual!! LOL and i am looking hard at OVER 184 in the ATL/CHI game... here is what i am analyzing... first the officiating crew main official ken mauer avg pts scored in his games as lead official 193.8 the crew rodney mott 194.6 and steve anderson 205.4, though in only 7 games officiated... that averages to197.93 ppg for this crew . ...looking at ATL avg of combined pts for both teams, its 192 and 185.5 for CHI, avg for the 2 teams 188.9...so the official avg is 197.93 and game avg for these 2 teams is 188.9 with a total set at 184.... both these teams have O/U records strongly to the under chi 14-21 and Atl 17-18, but due to the officiating trends and team averages for scoring, i will be on over 184 in the atl/chi game...
KK, ive been doing some totals work this morning....ambitious, not lazy as usual!! LOL and i am looking hard at OVER 184 in the ATL/CHI game... here is what i am analyzing... first the officiating crew main official ken mauer avg pts scored in his games as lead official 193.8 the crew rodney mott 194.6 and steve anderson 205.4, though in only 7 games officiated... that averages to197.93 ppg for this crew . ...looking at ATL avg of combined pts for both teams, its 192 and 185.5 for CHI, avg for the 2 teams 188.9...so the official avg is 197.93 and game avg for these 2 teams is 188.9 with a total set at 184.... both these teams have O/U records strongly to the under chi 14-21 and Atl 17-18, but due to the officiating trends and team averages for scoring, i will be on over 184 in the atl/chi game...
It's people like you that I would like to see more of. These stats are crucial believe it or not. Thanks for bringing it to the table. Any additional information is welcomed!! Thanks bud!
0
Quote Originally Posted by pigskinpicker:
KK, ive been doing some totals work this morning....ambitious, not lazy as usual!! LOL and i am looking hard at OVER 184 in the ATL/CHI game... here is what i am analyzing... first the officiating crew main official ken mauer avg pts scored in his games as lead official 193.8 the crew rodney mott 194.6 and steve anderson 205.4, though in only 7 games officiated... that averages to197.93 ppg for this crew . ...looking at ATL avg of combined pts for both teams, its 192 and 185.5 for CHI, avg for the 2 teams 188.9...so the official avg is 197.93 and game avg for these 2 teams is 188.9 with a total set at 184.... both these teams have O/U records strongly to the under chi 14-21 and Atl 17-18, but due to the officiating trends and team averages for scoring, i will be on over 184 in the atl/chi game...
It's people like you that I would like to see more of. These stats are crucial believe it or not. Thanks for bringing it to the table. Any additional information is welcomed!! Thanks bud!
It's people like you that I would like to see more of. These stats are crucial believe it or not. Thanks for bringing it to the table. Any additional information is welcomed!! Thanks bud!
this isnt a knock on KK, though hes been in a slump recently, i know he has picked games successfully, but what aggravates me about him and many others in here that like to post their plays every day and track their won-loss record..... they simply give this long list of picks they will play. i have no idea how they arrive at these decisions, so following them becomes a bit like russian roulette. i dont post more because i am too lazy usually to type an analysis and reasoning for the games i play, and frankly i cant do better than around 50% regardless of how much work i put in..... so i dont post a lot of plays. but i feel very strongly about this the over in the atl/chi game.
0
Quote Originally Posted by penwand:
It's people like you that I would like to see more of. These stats are crucial believe it or not. Thanks for bringing it to the table. Any additional information is welcomed!! Thanks bud!
this isnt a knock on KK, though hes been in a slump recently, i know he has picked games successfully, but what aggravates me about him and many others in here that like to post their plays every day and track their won-loss record..... they simply give this long list of picks they will play. i have no idea how they arrive at these decisions, so following them becomes a bit like russian roulette. i dont post more because i am too lazy usually to type an analysis and reasoning for the games i play, and frankly i cant do better than around 50% regardless of how much work i put in..... so i dont post a lot of plays. but i feel very strongly about this the over in the atl/chi game.
david, i agree with ya buddy, kk does indeed show a lot of class the way he handles the haters. he has my respect for it. and a suggestion for you my friend... quoting you "up most respect" the term is UTMOST defined as showing the greatest or highest degree..... i just dont want the public to think of us as a bunch of pot bellied high school drop out beer guzzlers that throw their money away gambling. .... dont be offended david, i taught high school 32 years and coached 20 of those and just retired... its still in my nature.
0
david, i agree with ya buddy, kk does indeed show a lot of class the way he handles the haters. he has my respect for it. and a suggestion for you my friend... quoting you "up most respect" the term is UTMOST defined as showing the greatest or highest degree..... i just dont want the public to think of us as a bunch of pot bellied high school drop out beer guzzlers that throw their money away gambling. .... dont be offended david, i taught high school 32 years and coached 20 of those and just retired... its still in my nature.
Atl/chi played once before this year with a line of 184. Score was 92-75 for a total of 167
ATL was 16-9 at the time, playing very well and Chi had no richard hamilton. deng went 5-14 and chi as a team shot just over 42%. i dont see where the game tonight will be like that one, though the officiating crew on dec 22 was a fairly high scoring crew.
0
Quote Originally Posted by bullmoose:
Atl/chi played once before this year with a line of 184. Score was 92-75 for a total of 167
ATL was 16-9 at the time, playing very well and Chi had no richard hamilton. deng went 5-14 and chi as a team shot just over 42%. i dont see where the game tonight will be like that one, though the officiating crew on dec 22 was a fairly high scoring crew.
Bol khmerkid, I know too how it feels like to start fresh. I was on fire at the beginning of the season bein up 200+ units, lost it all back pretty much to the mans. Lol
0
Bol khmerkid, I know too how it feels like to start fresh. I was on fire at the beginning of the season bein up 200+ units, lost it all back pretty much to the mans. Lol
Atl averages 93.4 ppg on the road with 91.2 possessions per game. thats 1.02 pt per possession. chicago at home averages 91.7 ppg at home on an avg of 90.3 possessions per game for 1.01 pts per possession...so we have a total of 1.03 pts per possession both teams combined multiplied by a total of an avg 181.5 possessions per game ... extrapolated out for a full game, total should be 186.945 or 187 pts and an officiating crew that calls an avg of 197.73 pts per game.... thats a decent shot at the over, IMO...
0
Atl averages 93.4 ppg on the road with 91.2 possessions per game. thats 1.02 pt per possession. chicago at home averages 91.7 ppg at home on an avg of 90.3 possessions per game for 1.01 pts per possession...so we have a total of 1.03 pts per possession both teams combined multiplied by a total of an avg 181.5 possessions per game ... extrapolated out for a full game, total should be 186.945 or 187 pts and an officiating crew that calls an avg of 197.73 pts per game.... thats a decent shot at the over, IMO...
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.