In Game 1, Dr. John's statistical model pegged a fair line for the game at Warriors -10.3and the game ended by 10 (https://www.covers.com/forum/ViewThread/103245186/game-1-analysis/1).
With last night's tickets cashing on both plays (2-0; Cavs +7.5 1H and Cavs +12.5; unofficial lean to Over 214.5 also cashed), Dr. John has now hit at 54.73% on 203 bets in the NBA playoffs. Wagering 2% of bankroll per bet, that amounts to an EV of +0.086% of bankroll per bet.
***Game 2 Analysis***
Much is riding on the tentative status of Iguodola. While he is officially listed as a Questionable designation, per the most up-to-date information, it looks as though he is actually closer to Doubtful for a Game 2 comeback.
Assuming Iguodola does not play, Dr. John's statistical model favors the Warriors by just 10.9 points. This is more than Game 1, and while it reflects the tendency for teams off of a loss in the playoffs to play better in the game that immediately follows, there was also an adjustment made for terrible defender Tristian Thompson playing relatively more minutes and oustanding performer Kyle Korver playing relatively less minutes than originally anticipated.
That being said, there are several intangible factors that favor the Warriors in this game. Namely, an angle playing on Home teams with an above average Home Court advantage playing teams with below average Road performance in the playoffs. In addition to this, it is all but hard fact that Steve Kerr is a more capable coach that Ty "Step Over" Lue. And this is evidenced by the Warriors 2H dominance (particularly in 3Q) throughout the playoffs, as well as in Game 1.
With respect to the intangible angle of Kerr being a better coach and this occurrence manifesting itself in strong halftime adjustments (and a strong 2H accordingly), it would be expected that the Warriors outperform the Cavaliers more in the 2H than in the 1H.
It necessarily follows that, the maximum 1H line should be no greater than Cavs +5.5. In fact, it should be several points lower than this. As seen in Game 1, by taking the 1H line we are effectively negating the coaching intangible angle to a large extent, and though there is still the additional intangible angle that favors the Warriors to contend with, there is value on the Cavs receiving so many points.
Take the Cavs +6.5 1H, down to +6 -115, and Cavs +12, down to Cavs +11.5 -110.
Official Plays are:
Cavs +6.5 1H -105 for 2 Units
Cavs +12 -110 for 2 Units
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
In Game 1, Dr. John's statistical model pegged a fair line for the game at Warriors -10.3and the game ended by 10 (https://www.covers.com/forum/ViewThread/103245186/game-1-analysis/1).
With last night's tickets cashing on both plays (2-0; Cavs +7.5 1H and Cavs +12.5; unofficial lean to Over 214.5 also cashed), Dr. John has now hit at 54.73% on 203 bets in the NBA playoffs. Wagering 2% of bankroll per bet, that amounts to an EV of +0.086% of bankroll per bet.
***Game 2 Analysis***
Much is riding on the tentative status of Iguodola. While he is officially listed as a Questionable designation, per the most up-to-date information, it looks as though he is actually closer to Doubtful for a Game 2 comeback.
Assuming Iguodola does not play, Dr. John's statistical model favors the Warriors by just 10.9 points. This is more than Game 1, and while it reflects the tendency for teams off of a loss in the playoffs to play better in the game that immediately follows, there was also an adjustment made for terrible defender Tristian Thompson playing relatively more minutes and oustanding performer Kyle Korver playing relatively less minutes than originally anticipated.
That being said, there are several intangible factors that favor the Warriors in this game. Namely, an angle playing on Home teams with an above average Home Court advantage playing teams with below average Road performance in the playoffs. In addition to this, it is all but hard fact that Steve Kerr is a more capable coach that Ty "Step Over" Lue. And this is evidenced by the Warriors 2H dominance (particularly in 3Q) throughout the playoffs, as well as in Game 1.
With respect to the intangible angle of Kerr being a better coach and this occurrence manifesting itself in strong halftime adjustments (and a strong 2H accordingly), it would be expected that the Warriors outperform the Cavaliers more in the 2H than in the 1H.
It necessarily follows that, the maximum 1H line should be no greater than Cavs +5.5. In fact, it should be several points lower than this. As seen in Game 1, by taking the 1H line we are effectively negating the coaching intangible angle to a large extent, and though there is still the additional intangible angle that favors the Warriors to contend with, there is value on the Cavs receiving so many points.
Take the Cavs +6.5 1H, down to +6 -115, and Cavs +12, down to Cavs +11.5 -110.
Wanted to release these plays good and early, as there is a fair chance the lines come down from where they are currently prior to gametime.
Update: Unfortunately now the number is hanging at 11.5. Either the sharps got wind of Dr. John's analysis/plays, or the number moved down organically. Though it is likely the former.
0
Quote Originally Posted by DrJohn3719:
Wanted to release these plays good and early, as there is a fair chance the lines come down from where they are currently prior to gametime.
Update: Unfortunately now the number is hanging at 11.5. Either the sharps got wind of Dr. John's analysis/plays, or the number moved down organically. Though it is likely the former.
I am beginning to think Kerr is not as good as the pundants make him out to be...lets face it, he inherited a winning lottery ticket when he took over for Mark Jackson...i am of the believer Kerrs success is more of a personality manager, rather than a basketball xs and os head coach type...anyone would look to be a competent coach when you are sitting on the Globetrotters bench...put Kerr on this years Atlanta or Chicago or Sacramento and hes just another useless HC like they all are when their teams are bottom feeders....although i dont like Lue either, he knows his role and is a very good assistant HC to James.
Regarding game two, i have to believe Durant plays alot better, and if he does, Warriors could easily win this game by 15+....we have never seen such inner turmoil and drama between a megastar like James and a role player starter like JR...and practically everyone else on the Cavs let Lebron down too...Korvers dumb touch foul on Klays 3 late, Hills missed FT, Loves terrible possession late jacking up a really bad shot, Clarkson laying bricks all game long, Thompson being useless as usual, Green being invisible all game...really the only legit player other than James showed up was Nance Jr who played great in his limited minutes...i have a hard time thinking the Cavs have the intestinal fortitude to overcome their misfortunes in game 1 and keep this one close...i think Steph and Klay bring back the splash brothers, while KD steps up with a much better effort...i do believe the Over is also a legit betting option in this game....the league loves scoring in the finals for maximum entertainment purposes, so i expect a ton of cheap fouls all game long leading to many more freebies at the ft line helping the total to nudge over...120 -102 type game is how the peoples champ sees this one.
BOL Dr.John...dont know why i felt the desire to go all Mr.Bator here with such amazing free analysis, but your style speaks to me and i like it
Victory Belongs to the Most Tenacious
0
I am beginning to think Kerr is not as good as the pundants make him out to be...lets face it, he inherited a winning lottery ticket when he took over for Mark Jackson...i am of the believer Kerrs success is more of a personality manager, rather than a basketball xs and os head coach type...anyone would look to be a competent coach when you are sitting on the Globetrotters bench...put Kerr on this years Atlanta or Chicago or Sacramento and hes just another useless HC like they all are when their teams are bottom feeders....although i dont like Lue either, he knows his role and is a very good assistant HC to James.
Regarding game two, i have to believe Durant plays alot better, and if he does, Warriors could easily win this game by 15+....we have never seen such inner turmoil and drama between a megastar like James and a role player starter like JR...and practically everyone else on the Cavs let Lebron down too...Korvers dumb touch foul on Klays 3 late, Hills missed FT, Loves terrible possession late jacking up a really bad shot, Clarkson laying bricks all game long, Thompson being useless as usual, Green being invisible all game...really the only legit player other than James showed up was Nance Jr who played great in his limited minutes...i have a hard time thinking the Cavs have the intestinal fortitude to overcome their misfortunes in game 1 and keep this one close...i think Steph and Klay bring back the splash brothers, while KD steps up with a much better effort...i do believe the Over is also a legit betting option in this game....the league loves scoring in the finals for maximum entertainment purposes, so i expect a ton of cheap fouls all game long leading to many more freebies at the ft line helping the total to nudge over...120 -102 type game is how the peoples champ sees this one.
BOL Dr.John...dont know why i felt the desire to go all Mr.Bator here with such amazing free analysis, but your style speaks to me and i like it
I am beginning to think Kerr is not as good as the pundants make him out to be...lets face it, he inherited a winning lottery ticket when he took over for Mark Jackson...i am of the believer Kerrs success is more of a personality manager, rather than a basketball xs and os head coach type...anyone would look to be a competent coach when you are sitting on the Globetrotters bench...put Kerr on this years Atlanta or Chicago or Sacramento and hes just another useless HC like they all are when their teams are bottom feeders....although i dont like Lue either, he knows his role and is a very good assistant HC to James.
Regarding game two, i have to believe Durant plays alot better, and if he does, Warriors could easily win this game by 15+....we have never seen such inner turmoil and drama between a megastar like James and a role player starter like JR...and practically everyone else on the Cavs let Lebron down too...Korvers dumb touch foul on Klays 3 late, Hills missed FT, Loves terrible possession late jacking up a really bad shot, Clarkson laying bricks all game long, Thompson being useless as usual, Green being invisible all game...really the only legit player other than James showed up was Nance Jr who played great in his limited minutes...i have a hard time thinking the Cavs have the intestinal fortitude to overcome their misfortunes in game 1 and keep this one close...i think Steph and Klay bring back the splash brothers, while KD steps up with a much better effort...i do believe the Over is also a legit betting option in this game....the league loves scoring in the finals for maximum entertainment purposes, so i expect a ton of cheap fouls all game long leading to many more freebies at the ft line helping the total to nudge over...120 -102 type game is how the peoples champ sees this one.
BOL Dr.John...dont know why i felt the desire to go all Mr.Bator here with such amazing free analysis, but your style speaks to me and i like it
a guy who comes back after a year long hiatus after all his losses and pegs a game with his "statistical model" to land on the 10 number only to be helped out by the biggest bone head play in history outside of Chris Webber's no time out and that demands respect? we have all won our fair share of wagers and even capped games to a complete T but none of us who have a shred of dignity go into others peoples threads and I mean ALL of the threads who laid the 12 with the Dubs and tell them " you should have followed me".
0
Quote Originally Posted by packersbackers:
I am beginning to think Kerr is not as good as the pundants make him out to be...lets face it, he inherited a winning lottery ticket when he took over for Mark Jackson...i am of the believer Kerrs success is more of a personality manager, rather than a basketball xs and os head coach type...anyone would look to be a competent coach when you are sitting on the Globetrotters bench...put Kerr on this years Atlanta or Chicago or Sacramento and hes just another useless HC like they all are when their teams are bottom feeders....although i dont like Lue either, he knows his role and is a very good assistant HC to James.
Regarding game two, i have to believe Durant plays alot better, and if he does, Warriors could easily win this game by 15+....we have never seen such inner turmoil and drama between a megastar like James and a role player starter like JR...and practically everyone else on the Cavs let Lebron down too...Korvers dumb touch foul on Klays 3 late, Hills missed FT, Loves terrible possession late jacking up a really bad shot, Clarkson laying bricks all game long, Thompson being useless as usual, Green being invisible all game...really the only legit player other than James showed up was Nance Jr who played great in his limited minutes...i have a hard time thinking the Cavs have the intestinal fortitude to overcome their misfortunes in game 1 and keep this one close...i think Steph and Klay bring back the splash brothers, while KD steps up with a much better effort...i do believe the Over is also a legit betting option in this game....the league loves scoring in the finals for maximum entertainment purposes, so i expect a ton of cheap fouls all game long leading to many more freebies at the ft line helping the total to nudge over...120 -102 type game is how the peoples champ sees this one.
BOL Dr.John...dont know why i felt the desire to go all Mr.Bator here with such amazing free analysis, but your style speaks to me and i like it
a guy who comes back after a year long hiatus after all his losses and pegs a game with his "statistical model" to land on the 10 number only to be helped out by the biggest bone head play in history outside of Chris Webber's no time out and that demands respect? we have all won our fair share of wagers and even capped games to a complete T but none of us who have a shred of dignity go into others peoples threads and I mean ALL of the threads who laid the 12 with the Dubs and tell them " you should have followed me".
trust me, I benefited from that OT in my wager as well. the difference is, I KNOW I got lucky and ill be damned if I visit everyones threads to tell them I had the right side.
0
Quote Originally Posted by DrJohn3719:
Jealousy is an ugly beast.
trust me, I benefited from that OT in my wager as well. the difference is, I KNOW I got lucky and ill be damned if I visit everyones threads to tell them I had the right side.
trust me, I benefited from that OT in my wager as well. the difference is, I KNOW I got lucky and ill be damned if I visit everyones threads to tell them I had the right side.
Dr. John is having a difficult time understanding...+7.5 1H and +12.5 would have hit...with or without OT. Can you clarify?
0
Quote Originally Posted by BIGDTITLE:
Quote Originally Posted by DrJohn3719:
Jealousy is an ugly beast.
trust me, I benefited from that OT in my wager as well. the difference is, I KNOW I got lucky and ill be damned if I visit everyones threads to tell them I had the right side.
Dr. John is having a difficult time understanding...+7.5 1H and +12.5 would have hit...with or without OT. Can you clarify?
sure can. you are hanging your hat on 10.3 when the Dubs won by 10 taking your victory lap that you completely nailed the cap and hit it on the head to boot. however, even in OT if it weren't for some questionable calls and a late meaningless JR three the Dubs win and cover and Dr. John is just another afterthought. So, again, GL on your future wagers and notoriety and this will be last time I engage with you.
0
sure can. you are hanging your hat on 10.3 when the Dubs won by 10 taking your victory lap that you completely nailed the cap and hit it on the head to boot. however, even in OT if it weren't for some questionable calls and a late meaningless JR three the Dubs win and cover and Dr. John is just another afterthought. So, again, GL on your future wagers and notoriety and this will be last time I engage with you.
sure can. you are hanging your hat on 10.3 when the Dubs won by 10 taking your victory lap that you completely nailed the cap and hit it on the head to boot. however, even in OT if it weren't for some questionable calls and a late meaningless JR three the Dubs win and cover and Dr. John is just another afterthought. So, again, GL on your future wagers and notoriety and this will be last time I engage with you.
back before Dr. John’s sobriety, he would’ve asked you for your drug dealer. The warriors were the beneficiary from these “questionable” calls. Otherwise the Cavs win outright. Anyone with a brain saw that.
0
Quote Originally Posted by BIGDTITLE:
sure can. you are hanging your hat on 10.3 when the Dubs won by 10 taking your victory lap that you completely nailed the cap and hit it on the head to boot. however, even in OT if it weren't for some questionable calls and a late meaningless JR three the Dubs win and cover and Dr. John is just another afterthought. So, again, GL on your future wagers and notoriety and this will be last time I engage with you.
back before Dr. John’s sobriety, he would’ve asked you for your drug dealer. The warriors were the beneficiary from these “questionable” calls. Otherwise the Cavs win outright. Anyone with a brain saw that.
dubs covering this one and winning it convincingly...
The thing is, Dr. John would love nothing more than for you to have a legitimate stance based off of defensible facts and to be able to debate this stance.
Unfortunately, however, as it stands, your assertion is based off of nothing more than the eye test, and this is why you are a negative Expected Value bettor, regarded by your bookie as nothing more than a pathetic cash cow.
0
Quote Originally Posted by SiuLungBao:
dubs covering this one and winning it convincingly...
The thing is, Dr. John would love nothing more than for you to have a legitimate stance based off of defensible facts and to be able to debate this stance.
Unfortunately, however, as it stands, your assertion is based off of nothing more than the eye test, and this is why you are a negative Expected Value bettor, regarded by your bookie as nothing more than a pathetic cash cow.
The thing is, Dr. John would love nothing more than for you to have a legitimate stance based off of defensible facts and to be able to debate this stance.
Unfortunately, however, as it stands, your assertion is based off of nothing more than the eye test, and this is why you are a negative Expected Value bettor, regarded by your bookie as nothing more than a pathetic cash cow.
I would love to see Dr.John assuming that's how he looks in his avatar.....Say exactly what he posted in real life at a bar to your average tatted up Golden state fan that wears a curry jersey
0
Quote Originally Posted by DrJohn3719:
The thing is, Dr. John would love nothing more than for you to have a legitimate stance based off of defensible facts and to be able to debate this stance.
Unfortunately, however, as it stands, your assertion is based off of nothing more than the eye test, and this is why you are a negative Expected Value bettor, regarded by your bookie as nothing more than a pathetic cash cow.
I would love to see Dr.John assuming that's how he looks in his avatar.....Say exactly what he posted in real life at a bar to your average tatted up Golden state fan that wears a curry jersey
The thing is, Dr. John would love nothing more than for you to have a legitimate stance based off of defensible facts and to be able to debate this stance.Unfortunately, however, as it stands, your assertion is based off of nothing more than the eye test, and this is why you are a negative Expected Value bettor, regarded by your bookie as nothing more than a pathetic cash cow.
I would love to see Dr.John assuming that's how he looks in his avatar.....Say exactly what he posted in real life at a bar to your average tatted up Golden state fan that wears a curry jersey
Dr. John has said far worse to a lot worse.
That being said, Dr. John received some unfortunate news last night and had a few beers...hence the lack of better judgment/cool head...
0
Quote Originally Posted by AFNfootballnerd:
Quote Originally Posted by DrJohn3719:
The thing is, Dr. John would love nothing more than for you to have a legitimate stance based off of defensible facts and to be able to debate this stance.Unfortunately, however, as it stands, your assertion is based off of nothing more than the eye test, and this is why you are a negative Expected Value bettor, regarded by your bookie as nothing more than a pathetic cash cow.
I would love to see Dr.John assuming that's how he looks in his avatar.....Say exactly what he posted in real life at a bar to your average tatted up Golden state fan that wears a curry jersey
Dr. John has said far worse to a lot worse.
That being said, Dr. John received some unfortunate news last night and had a few beers...hence the lack of better judgment/cool head...
Iguodola has been downgraded to Doubtful once again, as Dr. John predicted.
Regarding the line, there is still a little line value at +11.5 -110 - though Kelly would dictate this is only a 1 unit play (it’s still available at -105 at certain shops).
That said, this line could very well get down to 11 by close. Though at that number, there may be some sharps willing to bite due to the aforementioned intangible angles that favor the Warriors and because it is a fair line.
0
Update:
Iguodola has been downgraded to Doubtful once again, as Dr. John predicted.
Regarding the line, there is still a little line value at +11.5 -110 - though Kelly would dictate this is only a 1 unit play (it’s still available at -105 at certain shops).
That said, this line could very well get down to 11 by close. Though at that number, there may be some sharps willing to bite due to the aforementioned intangible angles that favor the Warriors and because it is a fair line.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.