again none of my biz, and nobody should b considering $50k wagers unless you talk with top management first
This makes no sense. The public probably bets on the same side at all casinos. If so, then if your casino's "guy" bets on the public side at other casino (offsetting your loss), there's another casino's "guy" betting on your casino.
For every offset bet you placed at another casino, a third casino probably put an offset bet at yours. It'd be an endless cycle.
Besides, how is equal betting ever possible? Especially where you offer hundreds of wagers including 2H and live betting where the posted odds only stay open less than 20 minutes?
This makes no sense. The public probably bets on the same side at all casinos. If so, then if your casino's "guy" bets on the public side at other casino (offsetting your loss), there's another casino's "guy" betting on your casino.
For every offset bet you placed at another casino, a third casino probably put an offset bet at yours. It'd be an endless cycle.
Besides, how is equal betting ever possible? Especially where you offer hundreds of wagers including 2H and live betting where the posted odds only stay open less than 20 minutes?
This makes no sense. The public probably bets on the same side at all casinos. If so, then if your casino's "guy" bets on the public side at other casino (offsetting your loss), there's another casino's "guy" betting on your casino.
For every offset bet you placed at another casino, a third casino probably put an offset bet at yours. It'd be an endless cycle.
Besides, how is equal betting ever possible? Especially where you offer hundreds of wagers including 2H and live betting where the posted odds only stay open less than 20 minutes?
This makes no sense. The public probably bets on the same side at all casinos. If so, then if your casino's "guy" bets on the public side at other casino (offsetting your loss), there's another casino's "guy" betting on your casino.
For every offset bet you placed at another casino, a third casino probably put an offset bet at yours. It'd be an endless cycle.
Besides, how is equal betting ever possible? Especially where you offer hundreds of wagers including 2H and live betting where the posted odds only stay open less than 20 minutes?
I thought the guy from Caesars bookmaker once said they don't get equal money on games. As in not even close. For the NO vs SF playoff game 2 years ago for instance, he said much more was wagered on NO than SF. They just hoped the right side won.
Also, what about Money Line bets with dogs +250 or higher. It's gotta be impossible to get anything close to equal action on such bets. People hate betting $3 to make $1. They think it's too much risk. But Vegas still puts up odds for those things. In fact, I thought they took a bloodbath when NYG beat NE 6 years ago in the SB as a 10 pt dog.
I thought the guy from Caesars bookmaker once said they don't get equal money on games. As in not even close. For the NO vs SF playoff game 2 years ago for instance, he said much more was wagered on NO than SF. They just hoped the right side won.
Also, what about Money Line bets with dogs +250 or higher. It's gotta be impossible to get anything close to equal action on such bets. People hate betting $3 to make $1. They think it's too much risk. But Vegas still puts up odds for those things. In fact, I thought they took a bloodbath when NYG beat NE 6 years ago in the SB as a 10 pt dog.
I thought the guy from Caesars bookmaker once said they don't get equal money on games. As in not even close. For the NO vs SF playoff game 2 years ago for instance, he said much more was wagered on NO than SF. They just hoped the right side won.
Also, what about Money Line bets with dogs +250 or higher. It's gotta be impossible to get anything close to equal action on such bets. People hate betting $3 to make $1. They think it's too much risk. But Vegas still puts up odds for those things. In fact, I thought they took a bloodbath when NYG beat NE 6 years ago in the SB as a 10 pt dog.
I thought the guy from Caesars bookmaker once said they don't get equal money on games. As in not even close. For the NO vs SF playoff game 2 years ago for instance, he said much more was wagered on NO than SF. They just hoped the right side won.
Also, what about Money Line bets with dogs +250 or higher. It's gotta be impossible to get anything close to equal action on such bets. People hate betting $3 to make $1. They think it's too much risk. But Vegas still puts up odds for those things. In fact, I thought they took a bloodbath when NYG beat NE 6 years ago in the SB as a 10 pt dog.
No, but they might a couple thousand on the ML. But the point is, no one bets the favorite. So lots of little bets on the dog can eventually add up to $10-20k or so. For a 250+ dog, that's risking $25k-50k.
I'm just shocked that a casino would care so much about a $50k sportsbook bet, when the entire casino is transacting BILLIONS in slots, table games, etc. They barely blink about a whale that wipes them out for a million dollars one day? But they'll fire a guy for approving a $50k sports bet that wins?
No, but they might a couple thousand on the ML. But the point is, no one bets the favorite. So lots of little bets on the dog can eventually add up to $10-20k or so. For a 250+ dog, that's risking $25k-50k.
I'm just shocked that a casino would care so much about a $50k sportsbook bet, when the entire casino is transacting BILLIONS in slots, table games, etc. They barely blink about a whale that wipes them out for a million dollars one day? But they'll fire a guy for approving a $50k sports bet that wins?
No the vig is the same: 10% on each side. It just looks big because when your odds move away from 50/50, the numbers look like a bigger gap. For instance -110 on one side and -110 on the other, is the same as -400 and +350. It's both 10% or so.
No the vig is the same: 10% on each side. It just looks big because when your odds move away from 50/50, the numbers look like a bigger gap. For instance -110 on one side and -110 on the other, is the same as -400 and +350. It's both 10% or so.
Which is why I don't understand why a $50k bet would bother them. If they think every bettor will lose, wouldn't they want more large bets? Larger bets eventually mean larger losses.
Which is why I don't understand why a $50k bet would bother them. If they think every bettor will lose, wouldn't they want more large bets? Larger bets eventually mean larger losses.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.