There's not much to say here as it is as basic as it gets.
How do you not support the Hawks here. If the Hawks lose this game and the three teams beneath them win they can drop from 6th to 9th as those three teams will all be Just ONE game behind them (Chicago Miami Indiana).
Not only that, if they drop to second, they are fed to the Cavs.
Therefore this is a must-win against an improving bottom-feeder off zero days rest.
Nets haven't won 2 in a row all year except over the Wizards and then the Suns. And we know the Suns are tanking. So officially they haven't won 2 in a row.
The line is too light to pass up at -2.5 even if Millsap doesn't play. There is enough here to muster a win by 3/4 or more.
VERY square but my record above is all 'alleged' sharp picks, so you be the judge as to what is square and sharp.
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
Record: 9-16
The Pick:
Hawks -2.5 over Nets.
There's not much to say here as it is as basic as it gets.
How do you not support the Hawks here. If the Hawks lose this game and the three teams beneath them win they can drop from 6th to 9th as those three teams will all be Just ONE game behind them (Chicago Miami Indiana).
Not only that, if they drop to second, they are fed to the Cavs.
Therefore this is a must-win against an improving bottom-feeder off zero days rest.
Nets haven't won 2 in a row all year except over the Wizards and then the Suns. And we know the Suns are tanking. So officially they haven't won 2 in a row.
The line is too light to pass up at -2.5 even if Millsap doesn't play. There is enough here to muster a win by 3/4 or more.
VERY square but my record above is all 'alleged' sharp picks, so you be the judge as to what is square and sharp.
Rockets opened up as 11.5 point favorites over the Suns.
That line is down to 6.5.
The Rockets have beaten the Suns by 14/16/31 this year. YES Harden played all those game but remember this, ALL those games occurred before the Suns started shutting down the roster (i.e., Bledsoe Chandler and Knight).
This is a team THAT WANTS to LOSE. The head coach was LAUGHING when tanking was insinuated by the media.
And get this. The Lakers currently have a 2 pt lead over Memphis. If the Lakers win, this is an even STRONGER play as they will be tied in the standings.
D'Antoni can come up with some run and gun schemes to win this game by more than 6 with his style of play.
This Suns team is special. I will be ABSOLUTELY floored if they win so the cover is the only issue. And 6 is not a huge number considering that. Not great but worth the try.
Buying it down to 6.
0
Second Play:
ROCKETS -6 (-120) over SUNS
Again Super Square.
BUT we get a 5 point discount without The Beard.
Rockets opened up as 11.5 point favorites over the Suns.
That line is down to 6.5.
The Rockets have beaten the Suns by 14/16/31 this year. YES Harden played all those game but remember this, ALL those games occurred before the Suns started shutting down the roster (i.e., Bledsoe Chandler and Knight).
This is a team THAT WANTS to LOSE. The head coach was LAUGHING when tanking was insinuated by the media.
And get this. The Lakers currently have a 2 pt lead over Memphis. If the Lakers win, this is an even STRONGER play as they will be tied in the standings.
D'Antoni can come up with some run and gun schemes to win this game by more than 6 with his style of play.
This Suns team is special. I will be ABSOLUTELY floored if they win so the cover is the only issue. And 6 is not a huge number considering that. Not great but worth the try.
Who are they tanking for? There is no clear overall number 1 here, so that means no one should be tanking. You really are a attention person, best of luck getting back to .500.
I know the Magic isnt tanking.
22nd
0
I asked a very simple question.
Angry much?
Who are they tanking for? There is no clear overall number 1 here, so that means no one should be tanking. You really are a attention person, best of luck getting back to .500.
Are you serious? Do you watch college basketball? Have you watched the product the teams are putting out?
Just tell me right here right now you do not believe the Suns, losers of 11 in a row and shutting down their roster, are NOT tanking?
If you can't answer the questions above, don't ask ones that don't make any sense just to play a contrarian troll.
Easy there tiger. Learn to read. He has a point. He asked you specifically who they are tanking for? AKA what player? His opinion was that picks 1-5 are virtually not a consensus now. Which is agreed upon by all analysts. Not that they are not tanking in general. Seems most people except you could see that.
0
Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:
Are you serious? Do you watch college basketball? Have you watched the product the teams are putting out?
Just tell me right here right now you do not believe the Suns, losers of 11 in a row and shutting down their roster, are NOT tanking?
If you can't answer the questions above, don't ask ones that don't make any sense just to play a contrarian troll.
Easy there tiger. Learn to read. He has a point. He asked you specifically who they are tanking for? AKA what player? His opinion was that picks 1-5 are virtually not a consensus now. Which is agreed upon by all analysts. Not that they are not tanking in general. Seems most people except you could see that.
Easy there tiger. Learn to read. He has a point. He asked you specifically who they are tanking for? AKA what player? His opinion was that picks 1-5 are virtually not a consensus now. Which is agreed upon by all analysts. Not that they are not tanking in general. Seems most people except you could see that.
When you post anything that isn't sucking him off even for losing picks he tends to get upset.
22nd
0
Quote Originally Posted by theboy1dur:
Easy there tiger. Learn to read. He has a point. He asked you specifically who they are tanking for? AKA what player? His opinion was that picks 1-5 are virtually not a consensus now. Which is agreed upon by all analysts. Not that they are not tanking in general. Seems most people except you could see that.
When you post anything that isn't sucking him off even for losing picks he tends to get upset.
Easy there tiger. Learn to read. He has a point. He asked you specifically who they are tanking for? AKA what player? His opinion was that picks 1-5 are virtually not a consensus now. Which is agreed upon by all analysts. Not that they are not tanking in general. Seems most people except you could see that.
Easy tiger? Are you serious too? I did read it. Did you? And did you read his next response?
His opinion was that there is no concensus #1 and therefore they shouldn't be tanking. And he said hat BEFORE the post you defended him in. And this is as a team is dumping games left and right and shutting down the team. I guess that is just being done well because well...because they want to do it for long term health purposes.
It is AMAZING that the enablers on this site devote themselves to anti-intellectualism. I mean. Seriously. No wonder why hundreds of posters come to me for meaningful and original content. Even the long-time posters can't comprehend very basic concepts.
0
Quote Originally Posted by theboy1dur:
Easy there tiger. Learn to read. He has a point. He asked you specifically who they are tanking for? AKA what player? His opinion was that picks 1-5 are virtually not a consensus now. Which is agreed upon by all analysts. Not that they are not tanking in general. Seems most people except you could see that.
Easy tiger? Are you serious too? I did read it. Did you? And did you read his next response?
His opinion was that there is no concensus #1 and therefore they shouldn't be tanking. And he said hat BEFORE the post you defended him in. And this is as a team is dumping games left and right and shutting down the team. I guess that is just being done well because well...because they want to do it for long term health purposes.
It is AMAZING that the enablers on this site devote themselves to anti-intellectualism. I mean. Seriously. No wonder why hundreds of posters come to me for meaningful and original content. Even the long-time posters can't comprehend very basic concepts.
You may or may not believe this....but I bet all three of your picks this morning before your posts. Sadly that means I have the rockets at -11.5, but I'm 5-1 when I bet on a game that I later saw you posted. Hopefully that streak continues today.
BOL
0
You may or may not believe this....but I bet all three of your picks this morning before your posts. Sadly that means I have the rockets at -11.5, but I'm 5-1 when I bet on a game that I later saw you posted. Hopefully that streak continues today.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.