HAWKS @ NETS

Yes, yes.

Here we have another one of the 'trolls from the shadows'.

You only see him once in a blue moon much like the corpse flower blooms every 7 years.

And like the corpse flower when he enters the forum it smells like rotting flesh.

Here's his message. "DON'T CAP at all and if you do it's a desperate attempt to improve your record!"

Because under his conditions, you'd just stay at 0-1 forever because well, that's how he thinks and uh...yeah.

Wow. The posters here.

First Ben Hogan CANNOT understand, after a DOZEN STRAIGHT LOSSES, now to teams with 2/5ths of their starters missing, why a team is tanking,

Then Milky misreading that Ben was talking about the Rockets tanking NOT the Nets (something I've corrected MANY other posters on),

to JR focusing on ONE loss instead of 3 winners.

I'm gonna put this ENTIRE forum under my foot like a cigarette butt.

SHAPE THE HELL UP PEOPLE. DO YOU HAVE NO SHAME???

Who here agrees with Ben Hogan that the Suns are not tanking?

I WANT ONE POSTER.

ONE.

And tell me why?

Because his argument is because there is no consensus #1 and therefore, why care to tank because the top 5 picks are all blue m&m's and ya just pick one and poof, it's all the same.

I mean, WHO wouldn't want to have their choice at #1 or #2. I mean, just give me #5 even though we've lost a dozen in a row. Let's start winning now to fly past the Lakers.

ONE POSTER.

JUST ONE.

Agree with Ben and tell me why the Suns are not tanking?

Does ONE poster buy his argument?


ONE.

2 - 1 for today scal ez money 

Scal - 

Scal .... WWE? Really? How can you even bet on something thats predetermined before it happens. 

worse things than splits

One winning night brings out the lunatic in scal 

Scal, I just realized you are posting at 4:30am on a Sunday night (Monday morning)

If I was a bit too harsh I apologize Ben and Hrad.

And just to add, about 75% of the wrestlers don't even wear the bikini brief tights that you feel threatens your masculinity anymore.

Scal,

What do you make of the Gonzaga / North Carolina game tonight?
Can you, as of yet, decipher any angles / edges?

Can Zags shut down X-factor J. Jackson a la Virginia's Defense...??
But just don't care for 67% public bets on NC w/ slight RLM —
and the easiest path I've ever seen in decades given by NCAA
to Gonzaga...  Perhaps there's a few too many debts owed Few...

This is comical.....

When the most obvious of infractions - by 2 Zags on the same play -
were clearly seen by all except 3 Refs... then a Tech foul on top of it -
6 point swing assured a Zags win, and the calls they've been getting.

NCAA has its issues with UNC and fake tests, fake grades
of "student" athletes...

To be fair I have no problem with WWE/WWF/or just wresting in general. I used to watch it all the time as a early-teen. Just fell out of love with it. My only point was that I've "followed" you for years, maybe not tailed your picks everytime but atleast popped in to see what you were picking and to read your writeup, and have never seen you play 4 picks in a night (being this non selective). The WWE one just stood out to me, I understand it was Wrestlemania and a huge night for the sport, but taking a bunch of big favs in matches and throwing them into a -110 bet just didnt seem like Scal to me. It worked, and you went 3-1 on the night which is huge, just seemed odd to me that you've seen to step out of your comfort zone a bit. BOL and hope you dont take this as bashing cause its not. I usually save my skepticism and digging for the idiots on this thread, just thought I'd ask you what I was thinking. 

Hey jerkoff,

you offer nothing useful to any thread anywhere...just stop posting


NOBODY COMES TO A SCAL THREAD TO READ YOU

NOBODY CARES WHAT YOU FIND  COMICAL

Wrestling is different from real sports, being that it's predetermind you can parlay huge chalk like that and not worry. Lesnar was going to get his win back, he was 0-2 vs Goldberg and was eliminated by him at Royal Rumble, Brock would have to be paralyzed on a botch to lose.

They wouldn't bury one of their top stars by making him job to a non-wrestler in the biggest show of the year. Shane Mcmahon hasn't won a singles match in any capacity since 2006.

His analysis on the HHH/Rollins match was dead on. The only argument you could possibly make to the contrary was they let HHH bury CM Punk, but clearly they didn't want Punk to get over, meanwhile Rollins is a protege of HHH from back in his NXT days. This one was as obvious as it could get.

The women's match was the only risk, if only because it's pretty obvious they want to make her a 16 time champion at some point like her father. (Nevermind the fact that there's several reigns the WWE doesn't count, but that's irrelevant). But yeah it was unlikely, and taking "The field" instead of 1 wrestler in particular made it an easier position to take.

All in all, easy money.

^^^ Good call Scal,
really hope you'd acknowledge it as another WIN of yours.