All Forums | NBA Betting

I like several spots tonight. WRITE-UPS and PICKS. Blazers@Hornets!!!

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 4598
Posts: 66
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2006
Posts: 28221
Posted: #26
Quote Originally Posted by StraightWagers:

hey you hit a posted teaser!

from the bottom of my heart i speak for all Blazers fans, thanks for taking Char tonight
 

You shouldn't. The blazers play was extremely square and you needed yet another second half meltdown to win the game (and really the overwhelming majority of this game you were outside the number).

Still they won and you laid 6 like that was a good number (a number that was a 13 pt swing from the Blazers home game which is ludicrous) and you believe you got value, when you needed a meltdown...call it a 'value meltdown'.

Ah well, that's why I teased. They are a bad team and are capable of this.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2014
Posts: 279
Posted: #27
Excuses excuses and more excuses of how your not on the right side you blame a meltdown but the team you bet on is 4-12  .... How about its because your usually betting on shi t t y teams 
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2012
Posts: 16785
Posted: #28
all good scal just bustin your balls, if you were'nt you and read some of what you post you'd bust your own balls...GL hope you get hot
All Out
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 8516
Posted: #29
This guy is loaded with excuses .
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2006
Posts: 28221
Posted: #30
Quote Originally Posted by joshfactor:

sorry man i but you are on the wrong track on both games. The hornets are really bad. They cant get stops & they got no go-to guy. The only way this covers is if the blazers go on vacation in the first half. Better off taking a 1st half play.

& the cavs are worse on the floor than on paper. Your revenge angle is all in your head. these guys are just collecting paychecks a night before thanksgiving. The cavs are bad enough & the wizards are good enough that even the -2 is at risk.

good luck though. all i suggest is to bet light until you come up with better stuff than this.


Yes yes, wrong track. Yes better stuff.


Gosh, the Cavs won by what? 25? And the hornets give up yet another Large halftime lead

If you walk away with the ticket in the blazer game and you are patting yourself on the back you are positively square.

Anyhow.


1-1 on the night resulting in some juice. I may just go teasers from here on out. I hit most but don't bother posting because of the sparse interest here. 

4-7 on the year.

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2011
Posts: 1090
Posted: #31
You are betting on the Hornets?? No wonder you are losing. secret is out hornets are really bad. bookies going to adjust.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2006
Posts: 28221
Posted: #32
Quote Originally Posted by MuffinThumper:

Excuses excuses and more excuses of how your not on the right side you blame a meltdown but the team you bet on is 4-12  .... How about its because your usually betting on shi t t y teams 


What excuses? I went 1-1. Onto the next game.

And yes I bet in shi try teams.

Go check out how the Knicks are doing as 14 pt dogs at the moment, one of the worst teams in the NBA vs. a WC above average team.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2012
Posts: 1665
Posted: #33
Quote Originally Posted by MuffinThumper:

Excuses excuses and more excuses of how your not on the right side you blame a meltdown but the team you bet on is 4-12  .... How about its because your usually betting on shi t t y teams 


hard to argue with this though scal. In sports betting theres a 'right' side and a 'wrong' side. You either WIN or LOSE. You should consider politics instead of wasting money on shtty teams (knicks, jets, giants etc etc)
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 8516
Posted: #34
Now he is winning most of his UNPOSTED teasers
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2014
Posts: 279
Posted: #35
Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:



What excuses? I went 1-1. Onto the next game.

And yes I bet in shi try teams.

Go check out how the Knicks are doing as 14 pt dogs at the moment, one of the worst teams in the NBA vs. a WC above average team.

Yep and the knicks are 4-11 ATS this year moron , go look at the other bottom feeders tonight magic blownout philly dont cover and your hornets dont cover get the drift you cocky dumb a s s
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2014
Posts: 5903
Posted: #36
4-7 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2011
Posts: 289
Posted: #37
Scal, what do you think bout the Lakers today?
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2014
Posts: 317
Posted: #38
You are such a hack
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2013
Posts: 1889
Posted: #39
why do you have a picture of mark sanchez without a shirt on ^^^^


 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2006
Posts: 28221
Posted: #40
Quote Originally Posted by cubsin08:

Now he is winning most of his UNPOSTED teasers

I am.

I have no reason to lie and make you think in a 'winner'. I've proven myself. I went 65% in the NFL and NBA last year. I actually mainly play teasers. It's what keeps the bankroll afloat through tough stretches. I don't lost them because hardly anyone is interested. But I'm going to start. Too many games 1 pt .5 pt 2 pts outside the númber and I'm sick and tired of it.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2006
Posts: 28221
Posted: #41
Quote Originally Posted by MuffinThumper:


Yep and the knicks are 4-11 ATS this year moron , go look at the other bottom feeders tonight magic blownout philly dont cover and your hornets dont cover get the drift you cocky dumb a s s

Who cares if they are 0-15

If betting was as easy as betting good teams, every square would be a millionaire.

Sixers pushed. That line was 8 and the Blazers needed a huge second half comeback to cover this number.

That's 1-1-1 on those three. (Knicks hornets Sixers)

Now let's look at the other 'bottom feeders'

Magic L ATS
Pacers Lakers Pistons all covered.

OKC was a 5 pt favorite and covered and they are most certainly a bottom feeder!

So that's 5-2-1 ATS on bottom feeders for the night.

Would you like to debate other games that qualify? Go ahead. You won't find 4 more wins to make it profitable for betting against bad teams.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2006
Posts: 28221
Posted: #42
Quote Originally Posted by Champ_Iz_Here:



hard to argue with this though scal. In sports betting theres a 'right' side and a 'wrong' side. You either WIN or LOSE. You should consider politics instead of wasting money on shtty teams (knicks, jets, giants etc etc)

Again I continually have to use the poker analogy.

Play two inferior cards against a superior hand over the long term and you will be the loser, not me.

And as far as shi**y teams go, see the post above this one.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2006
Posts: 28221
Posted: #43
Quote Originally Posted by oldscho0led:

Scal, what do you think bout the Lakers today?

Didn't see this in time
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2006
Posts: 28221
Posted: #44
Quote Originally Posted by CAPT-DOUCHE:

4-7 

Why would you repeat me.

I posted my record before you in post 31.

I have nothing to hide.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2013
Posts: 285
Posted: #45
Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:


Again I continually have to use the poker analogy.

Play two inferior cards against a superior hand over the long term and you will be the loser, not me.

And as far as shi**y teams go, see the post above this one.

lol how can you say that when all u do is play bad cards and hope for a good board 
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2010
Posts: 7900
Posted: #46
Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:

To all the regulars above


Let me say something about teasers to the guys defaming them:

In the NFL and CFB, you can find VERY strong spots EVERY WEEK.

Whether you believe that or not is up to you but the Giants +11.5 over the Cowboys, as stated specifically in my thread was FREE MONEY.

The Cowboys simply don't blow out the Giants in that rivalry and at home it definitely will not happen.

As far as the NBA, I still like the Cavs side tonight. But that is a homer pick and to lay 7 with a 6-7 team vs a 9-4 team is square. Who needs me to come on this board and say "take the Cavs"? You can do that yourself.



But to get the Cavs at a ML in a mini-revenge game, where the other team is missing the guy that makes it all click in Nene, where you know Lebron doesn't want to have to watch Cavs 'implosion' vignettes about a 6-8 team over his buttered crescent rolls and green bean casserole?

Wow, that is a rock solid spot.

Couple that with the previous cap of the Hornets where you need a blowout to lose (not gonna happen) and you have a really solid tease that pays Exactly the same as a side at -4.5?

Wow. Great spot.

Evolve as a capper when teases show themselves to be legitimate!




Very True
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2011
Posts: 398
Posted: #47
Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:

 

You shouldn't. The blazers play was extremely square and you needed yet another second half meltdown to win the game (and really the overwhelming majority of this game you were outside the number).

Still they won and you laid 6 like that was a good number (a number that was a 13 pt swing from the Blazers home game which is ludicrous) and you believe you got value, when you needed a meltdown...call it a 'value meltdown'.

Ah well, that's why I teased. They are a bad team and are capable of this.
.       Did his bet win? Meltdown square bet whatever you have to say to make you feel better. The right side is the winning side bro basketball is a game of runs or "meltdowns". Nice teaser hit though boss 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2014
Posts: 15
Posted: #48
Scal keep going !  GL !
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2006
Posts: 28221
Posted: #49

Quote Originally Posted by droyder:

my goodness you just keep getting crushed

 

Yes folks.


These are the trolls you are dealing with.

 

I went 1-1 and got crushed...

 
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2006
Posts: 28221
Posted: #50
Quote Originally Posted by OKCSPURS:


lol how can you say that when all u do is play bad cards and hope for a good board 

LOL.

Except those are NOT bad cards when you cap a game kid.

They are good cards.

The average square over the long-term looks at this game and says:

Ooh, Ooh, Blazers good.

Blazers good record. My oh my.

Blazers win last 8!

Me take Blazers!

Hornets sucky sucky!

They know nothing more than that.

That is why they lose.

Now if you capped the game there was a way you could take the Blazers. MKG and Gary Neal didn't play. That could provide justification if you played the Blazers.

But do you think the average square does that? No. They blindly play the Blazers...

And lose it alllllllll.....alllllllllll of it over the long term. They win tonight and lose the next 5 nights in a row. 

All Forums | NBA Betting
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.