With 6 games couldn’t we just round robin to 3s and 4s
Nuggets/Wizards O234.5
Blazers/Pelicans O236
1X
Nuggets/Wizards O234.5
Blazers/Pelicans O236
Rockets/76ers O227
Pacers/Wolves O225
Jazz/Clippers O228.5
Thunder/Grizzlies O227
$100 to win $4741.27
Nuggets/Wizards O234.5
Blazers/Pelicans O236
1X
Nuggets/Wizards O234.5
Blazers/Pelicans O236
Rockets/76ers O227
Pacers/Wolves O225
Jazz/Clippers O228.5
Thunder/Grizzlies O227
$100 to win $4741.27
@Holyh3llz
That's up to you. Play it however you want. All I know is that parlaying ALL games that are 225 or higher each day together (whenever there are 3 or more) for $100, would make you a winner most years at the end of the year, so that's what I do. I occasionally sprinkle in a round robin or something for fun.
@Holyh3llz
That's up to you. Play it however you want. All I know is that parlaying ALL games that are 225 or higher each day together (whenever there are 3 or more) for $100, would make you a winner most years at the end of the year, so that's what I do. I occasionally sprinkle in a round robin or something for fun.
Thunder/Grizz gonna be close.
Blazers/Pelicans looks on pace.
Jazz/Clippers not looking too hot, but if Thunder/Jazz hit you can hedge bigger on this.
Of course the 6 teamer might hit cause I said I couldn't do it! I wanna see it (that's what she said)!
Thunder/Grizz gonna be close.
Blazers/Pelicans looks on pace.
Jazz/Clippers not looking too hot, but if Thunder/Jazz hit you can hedge bigger on this.
Of course the 6 teamer might hit cause I said I couldn't do it! I wanna see it (that's what she said)!
@PedroParlay20
Thanks man.
it’s a long season. We will hit some three, four maybe even some 5+ teamers before it’s over. We already hit one five teamer that pushed one game and was converted to a 4. :)
@PedroParlay20
Thanks man.
it’s a long season. We will hit some three, four maybe even some 5+ teamers before it’s over. We already hit one five teamer that pushed one game and was converted to a 4. :)
This is a great, easy system to use and try. I do have a couple of questions if you don’t mind.
1. If a total starts below 225 but creeps up throughout the day, do you still include it?
2. If I am understanding the system correct, it is just the top two scores of the night over 225. Let’s say I started simply betting a dollar on them, then it would be $1, $2, $3, $5, etc..?
3. Did you ever check to see what the past results would be betting every game simply over 225?
4. Have you ever tested this with college basketball/other sports by any chance? I’d be curious to see the results on that as well
Really excited to keep trying this- it’s great work
This is a great, easy system to use and try. I do have a couple of questions if you don’t mind.
1. If a total starts below 225 but creeps up throughout the day, do you still include it?
2. If I am understanding the system correct, it is just the top two scores of the night over 225. Let’s say I started simply betting a dollar on them, then it would be $1, $2, $3, $5, etc..?
3. Did you ever check to see what the past results would be betting every game simply over 225?
4. Have you ever tested this with college basketball/other sports by any chance? I’d be curious to see the results on that as well
Really excited to keep trying this- it’s great work
One more- sorry. Let’s say you get to 25x and it loses, do you then just start over?
sorry for the questions I’m just trying to get a better understanding. Thanks my man
One more- sorry. Let’s say you get to 25x and it loses, do you then just start over?
sorry for the questions I’m just trying to get a better understanding. Thanks my man
@gkulps19
1. If a total starts below 225 but creeps up throughout the day, do you still include it?
We've come to find that the query system that all the research was based off of DOES include games that started below 225, but were 225 or higher before tip-off. As a result, the answer is ... sort of. If we have to lock in our parlay at the tip-off of the first game of the day, we have to use every games number at that point in time. We can't wait three hours to include another game after the first one has started.
2. If I am understanding the system correct, it is just the top two scores of the night over 225. Let’s say I started simply betting a dollar on them, then it would be $1, $2, $3, $5, etc..?
A unit for me is $50. A unit for you can be whatever you want, just make sure you can afford the entire chase. I set a bankroll that can afford three consecutive losses, though that has never even come close to happening in 10 years or research. The unit structure is 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 12, 18, 25. So, a "day 3" wager for me is $150. A "day 7" wager for me is $900.
3. Did you ever check to see what the past results would be betting every game simply over 225?
No, the parlay system is what makes this work. Winning exponential amounts as opposed to straight up bets.
4. Have you ever tested this with college basketball/other sports by any chance? I’d be curious to see the results on that as well
This idea is a spin-off of a hockey strategy that you can find in the system and strategies forums of covers. It involves two road favorites being parlayed together. I took that idea, tried to find something similar in other sports, and back tested this theory over 10 years and found it to be very profitable.
5. Let’s say you get to 25x and it loses, do you then just start over
Yes
@gkulps19
1. If a total starts below 225 but creeps up throughout the day, do you still include it?
We've come to find that the query system that all the research was based off of DOES include games that started below 225, but were 225 or higher before tip-off. As a result, the answer is ... sort of. If we have to lock in our parlay at the tip-off of the first game of the day, we have to use every games number at that point in time. We can't wait three hours to include another game after the first one has started.
2. If I am understanding the system correct, it is just the top two scores of the night over 225. Let’s say I started simply betting a dollar on them, then it would be $1, $2, $3, $5, etc..?
A unit for me is $50. A unit for you can be whatever you want, just make sure you can afford the entire chase. I set a bankroll that can afford three consecutive losses, though that has never even come close to happening in 10 years or research. The unit structure is 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 12, 18, 25. So, a "day 3" wager for me is $150. A "day 7" wager for me is $900.
3. Did you ever check to see what the past results would be betting every game simply over 225?
No, the parlay system is what makes this work. Winning exponential amounts as opposed to straight up bets.
4. Have you ever tested this with college basketball/other sports by any chance? I’d be curious to see the results on that as well
This idea is a spin-off of a hockey strategy that you can find in the system and strategies forums of covers. It involves two road favorites being parlayed together. I took that idea, tried to find something similar in other sports, and back tested this theory over 10 years and found it to be very profitable.
5. Let’s say you get to 25x and it loses, do you then just start over
Yes
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.