I'd look for LA to win 1 of the first 2 games in Denver.
Why? The Nuggets are 37-4 at home this season with Nikola Jokic in the lineup. They're 6-0 at home in the playoffs winning by an average of 14 points per game. The Lakers are 2-4 in the playoffs on the road with all 4 losses being non-competitive. They don't seem to have what it takes to upset the Nuggets at Ball Arena, but then again I didn't think that any team in this year's playoff field would.
The last time the Jokic-led Nuggets lost a home game they really wanted to win was more than five months ago. They lost a couple home games late in the season to the Bulls and Nets, but by then they'd already built a huge lead over the second place Grizzlies.
The Nuggets went 92 days without losing a home game with Jokic in the lineup, from December 6th to March 8th. Did no one notice that?
0
Quote Originally Posted by theclaw:
I'd look for LA to win 1 of the first 2 games in Denver.
Why? The Nuggets are 37-4 at home this season with Nikola Jokic in the lineup. They're 6-0 at home in the playoffs winning by an average of 14 points per game. The Lakers are 2-4 in the playoffs on the road with all 4 losses being non-competitive. They don't seem to have what it takes to upset the Nuggets at Ball Arena, but then again I didn't think that any team in this year's playoff field would.
The last time the Jokic-led Nuggets lost a home game they really wanted to win was more than five months ago. They lost a couple home games late in the season to the Bulls and Nets, but by then they'd already built a huge lead over the second place Grizzlies.
The Nuggets went 92 days without losing a home game with Jokic in the lineup, from December 6th to March 8th. Did no one notice that?
Bob oh boy, Lakers coming back after being down big, geez, they could of, would of, should of won game 1.
Not the best result for me to play LA tonight.
LA won ATS on official closing line, I never did check the line later in the day but had I known it went to -7 that's a big line movement I would of taken LA +7.
Covers has -7.5 in Nuggets game .
With LA covering they are now off 3 ATS wins, I like LA to win game 2 SU but don't like to back teams off 3 ATS wins, but I think LA is the right play game 2. This situation is different from other 3 ATS wins but still decide to pass on the game
0
Bob oh boy, Lakers coming back after being down big, geez, they could of, would of, should of won game 1.
Not the best result for me to play LA tonight.
LA won ATS on official closing line, I never did check the line later in the day but had I known it went to -7 that's a big line movement I would of taken LA +7.
Covers has -7.5 in Nuggets game .
With LA covering they are now off 3 ATS wins, I like LA to win game 2 SU but don't like to back teams off 3 ATS wins, but I think LA is the right play game 2. This situation is different from other 3 ATS wins but still decide to pass on the game
Quote Originally Posted by theclaw: I'd look for LA to win 1 of the first 2 games in Denver. Why? The Nuggets are 37-4 at home this season with Nikola Jokic in the lineup. They're 6-0 at home in the playoffs winning by an average of 14 points per game. The Lakers are 2-4 in the playoffs on the road with all 4 losses being non-competitive. They don't seem to have what it takes to upset the Nuggets at Ball Arena, but then again I didn't think that any team in this year's playoff field would. The last time the Jokic-led Nuggets lost a home game they really wanted to win was more than five months ago. They lost a couple home games late in the season to the Bulls and Nets, but by then they'd already built a huge lead over the second place Grizzlies. The Nuggets went 92 days without losing a home game with Jokic in the lineup, from December 6th to March 8th. Did no one notice that?
I don't think that info is as important as which team is the better team. Because the Nuggets did all that is why the better team would beat them at home.
So if LA is the better team which may be debatable, based on final 22 games LA is the better team, but a small sample size, I am willing to back that info and the fact Nuggets rate poorly for a no. 1 seed.
If the Nuggets prove the info wrong I'll take my losses and live with it .
0
Quote Originally Posted by MrBator:
Quote Originally Posted by theclaw: I'd look for LA to win 1 of the first 2 games in Denver. Why? The Nuggets are 37-4 at home this season with Nikola Jokic in the lineup. They're 6-0 at home in the playoffs winning by an average of 14 points per game. The Lakers are 2-4 in the playoffs on the road with all 4 losses being non-competitive. They don't seem to have what it takes to upset the Nuggets at Ball Arena, but then again I didn't think that any team in this year's playoff field would. The last time the Jokic-led Nuggets lost a home game they really wanted to win was more than five months ago. They lost a couple home games late in the season to the Bulls and Nets, but by then they'd already built a huge lead over the second place Grizzlies. The Nuggets went 92 days without losing a home game with Jokic in the lineup, from December 6th to March 8th. Did no one notice that?
I don't think that info is as important as which team is the better team. Because the Nuggets did all that is why the better team would beat them at home.
So if LA is the better team which may be debatable, based on final 22 games LA is the better team, but a small sample size, I am willing to back that info and the fact Nuggets rate poorly for a no. 1 seed.
If the Nuggets prove the info wrong I'll take my losses and live with it .
No clue what LBJ was thinking, he was well below ave 3 pt shooter in regular season was terrible in round 1 like 19.5% and well below ave round 2 like 33% on 3's but when LA needed baskets he kept throwing up 3's and is now 0 of 10 VS Nuggets.
When you need baskets and need to win a game you must be aggressive and attack the basket this also opens up getting FTs, maybe he is tired settling for long jumpers or just a terrible shot selection at a time the team needed him the most.
That was aggravating to watch to say the least.
0
No clue what LBJ was thinking, he was well below ave 3 pt shooter in regular season was terrible in round 1 like 19.5% and well below ave round 2 like 33% on 3's but when LA needed baskets he kept throwing up 3's and is now 0 of 10 VS Nuggets.
When you need baskets and need to win a game you must be aggressive and attack the basket this also opens up getting FTs, maybe he is tired settling for long jumpers or just a terrible shot selection at a time the team needed him the most.
Celtics off 2 SU & ATS losses and down 0-2, good spot to back Celtics today.
We know Heat are better then regular season PR's make them look, how much better not really sure.
Celtics seem overvalued on the line but this is a good spot to back them, play is on the Celtics.
I didn't get the best line but still think it's a good play.
Celtics have a decent shot to comeback and win the series but they must get it done today to have any hope and they are a good enough road team to do it.
Celtics -4 over Heat --- 1.1 units
0
My Lines ..,................
Celtics -7.43 over Heat
Celtics off 2 SU & ATS losses and down 0-2, good spot to back Celtics today.
We know Heat are better then regular season PR's make them look, how much better not really sure.
Celtics seem overvalued on the line but this is a good spot to back them, play is on the Celtics.
I didn't get the best line but still think it's a good play.
Celtics have a decent shot to comeback and win the series but they must get it done today to have any hope and they are a good enough road team to do it.
Lakers game 3 was a tough spot as they were coming off 5 ATS wins, I didn't get around to posting that game, was busy but I the Lakers down 0-2 naturally seemed the right play but no way I'd take a team off 5ATS wins.
I think Nuggets got some big breaks for the first 2 games to fall the way they did which set them up very nicely.
LBJ in game 3 still jacking up 3's is shocking to me. At one point I think 4th quarter with game tied Nuggets make a 3 LBJ jacks up a 3 misses bad, Nuggets come down, bang another 3 now a tie is a 6 pt Nuggets lead.
LBJ jackup a few more 3's after Nuggets kept building their lead, when LA needed a basket in the worst way LBJ continued jacking up 3's when the guy is terrible all year and in the playoffs making 3's.
Absolutely ridiculous.
0
Lakers game 3 was a tough spot as they were coming off 5 ATS wins, I didn't get around to posting that game, was busy but I the Lakers down 0-2 naturally seemed the right play but no way I'd take a team off 5ATS wins.
I think Nuggets got some big breaks for the first 2 games to fall the way they did which set them up very nicely.
LBJ in game 3 still jacking up 3's is shocking to me. At one point I think 4th quarter with game tied Nuggets make a 3 LBJ jacks up a 3 misses bad, Nuggets come down, bang another 3 now a tie is a 6 pt Nuggets lead.
LBJ jackup a few more 3's after Nuggets kept building their lead, when LA needed a basket in the worst way LBJ continued jacking up 3's when the guy is terrible all year and in the playoffs making 3's.
@theclaw AD was trash last night too. Might be the worst sidekick in Lebrons history
AD had 18 rebounds and 28 points on 11/18 FG and only 1 TO. Not exactly trash. The Lakers are up against a superior team. It's as simple as that. Lebron is old. His championship days are behind him. None of you Lakers backers give any credit to the Nuggets. It's all about what the Lakers did wrong.
0
Quote Originally Posted by bobmaloogatimesfive:
@theclaw AD was trash last night too. Might be the worst sidekick in Lebrons history
AD had 18 rebounds and 28 points on 11/18 FG and only 1 TO. Not exactly trash. The Lakers are up against a superior team. It's as simple as that. Lebron is old. His championship days are behind him. None of you Lakers backers give any credit to the Nuggets. It's all about what the Lakers did wrong.
AD had 18 rebounds and 28 points on 11/18 FG and only 1 TO. Not exactly trash. The Lakers are up against a superior team. It's as simple as that. Lebron is old. His championship days are behind him. None of you Lakers backers give any credit to the Nuggets. It's all about what the Lakers did wrong.
Bobmaloogatimesfive was referring to Anthony Davis' poor Game 2 performance, not yesterday's game.
1
Quote Originally Posted by Jimmy_Cats:
AD had 18 rebounds and 28 points on 11/18 FG and only 1 TO. Not exactly trash. The Lakers are up against a superior team. It's as simple as that. Lebron is old. His championship days are behind him. None of you Lakers backers give any credit to the Nuggets. It's all about what the Lakers did wrong.
Bobmaloogatimesfive was referring to Anthony Davis' poor Game 2 performance, not yesterday's game.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.