LeagueCapperFirst of all ... Much respect to you and your capping skills Sir ...Secondly ... I would just like to inform you of something that I have noticed regarding your picks ...Now, before everyone on here starts jumping up and down, slagging me, dissing me, etc, etc, etc, what I am about to tell you, is, as I said, "something that I have noticed", I don't have records or tally's, I don't have the time to go back -- tracking It all (maybe someone else, who follows you on here, does) ...I would be very surprised if you are not hitting around 75% and over on this ...Have you, or anyone else noticed, that you're selections for the full game, ARE HITTING FIRST QUARTER ???Again today, your 2 selections would have been "money" instead of losers if you bet them first quarter ... I have been noticing this for quite some time ... On numerous occasions the first quarter hit, and so did the full game ... But on many, many occasions, the first quarter hit, when the full game selection did not ...Take a look at it my man ... There could be something there ...Cheers and the very best of luck to all your plays buddy.
this could be a goldmine post for LC or whoever takes the time to backcheck this to see what the record is....if its 75% there is lcs bew strategy. But with 50k people following his picks will they hit 75%? Anyway it's nice to see someone else besides myself who is also excellent at spotting patterns
0
Quote Originally Posted by sydneys-best:
LeagueCapperFirst of all ... Much respect to you and your capping skills Sir ...Secondly ... I would just like to inform you of something that I have noticed regarding your picks ...Now, before everyone on here starts jumping up and down, slagging me, dissing me, etc, etc, etc, what I am about to tell you, is, as I said, "something that I have noticed", I don't have records or tally's, I don't have the time to go back -- tracking It all (maybe someone else, who follows you on here, does) ...I would be very surprised if you are not hitting around 75% and over on this ...Have you, or anyone else noticed, that you're selections for the full game, ARE HITTING FIRST QUARTER ???Again today, your 2 selections would have been "money" instead of losers if you bet them first quarter ... I have been noticing this for quite some time ... On numerous occasions the first quarter hit, and so did the full game ... But on many, many occasions, the first quarter hit, when the full game selection did not ...Take a look at it my man ... There could be something there ...Cheers and the very best of luck to all your plays buddy.
this could be a goldmine post for LC or whoever takes the time to backcheck this to see what the record is....if its 75% there is lcs bew strategy. But with 50k people following his picks will they hit 75%? Anyway it's nice to see someone else besides myself who is also excellent at spotting patterns
In 27 of Boston's last 28 home games that they won this year prior to Monday night, the Celtics scored more than 106 points, which is their Team Total tonight.
This is a pretty strong and meaningful trend and these low scoring games like Monday night tend to reverse themselves. I trust the Celtics to get their points tonight a lot more than I trust the Pacers, so taking Celtics team total over 106 looks pretty solid to me as long as they do not shoot 36% again from the field. It will be a MAX Limit Play for me.
Just something to consider. BOL tonight LC!!!
0
Something to consider tonight with the Celtics.
In 27 of Boston's last 28 home games that they won this year prior to Monday night, the Celtics scored more than 106 points, which is their Team Total tonight.
This is a pretty strong and meaningful trend and these low scoring games like Monday night tend to reverse themselves. I trust the Celtics to get their points tonight a lot more than I trust the Pacers, so taking Celtics team total over 106 looks pretty solid to me as long as they do not shoot 36% again from the field. It will be a MAX Limit Play for me.
In 27 of Boston's last 28 home games that they won this year prior to Monday night, the Celtics scored more than 106 points, which is their Team Total tonight.
This is a pretty strong and meaningful trend and these low scoring games like Monday night tend to reverse themselves. I trust the Celtics to get their points tonight a lot more than I trust the Pacers, so taking Celtics team total over 106 looks pretty solid to me as long as they do not shoot 36% again from the field. It will be a MAX Limit Play for me.
Just something to consider. BOL tonight LC!!!
Marvelous insignt init.... I will consider this for sure
0
Quote Originally Posted by In2it:
Something to consider tonight with the Celtics.
In 27 of Boston's last 28 home games that they won this year prior to Monday night, the Celtics scored more than 106 points, which is their Team Total tonight.
This is a pretty strong and meaningful trend and these low scoring games like Monday night tend to reverse themselves. I trust the Celtics to get their points tonight a lot more than I trust the Pacers, so taking Celtics team total over 106 looks pretty solid to me as long as they do not shoot 36% again from the field. It will be a MAX Limit Play for me.
Just something to consider. BOL tonight LC!!!
Marvelous insignt init.... I will consider this for sure
Sometimes I don't understand coaching, I know analytics say you have to shoot 3's but if your team sucks balls shooting the 3 why do you keep pushing it?
Spurs finished no. 1 in league in 3 pt shooting % at 39.2% better then the Warriors.
That's why you keep shooting, a coach will not stop shooting because the team is 0-10 to start a game or whatever it may be, players won't either, they keep shooting which is the way to play if your good at shooting 3's.
Unforetunately every team and player will have bad to very bad shooting days at 3's, you just suffer through those and move on to another day.
The bigger issue is when your bad at shooting 3's and keep taking them and missing .............. Westbrook.............
0
Quote Originally Posted by dubabay:
Sometimes I don't understand coaching, I know analytics say you have to shoot 3's but if your team sucks balls shooting the 3 why do you keep pushing it?
Spurs finished no. 1 in league in 3 pt shooting % at 39.2% better then the Warriors.
That's why you keep shooting, a coach will not stop shooting because the team is 0-10 to start a game or whatever it may be, players won't either, they keep shooting which is the way to play if your good at shooting 3's.
Unforetunately every team and player will have bad to very bad shooting days at 3's, you just suffer through those and move on to another day.
The bigger issue is when your bad at shooting 3's and keep taking them and missing .............. Westbrook.............
In 27 of Boston's last 28 home games that they won this year prior to Monday night, the Celtics scored more than 106 points, which is their Team Total tonight.
This is a pretty strong and meaningful trend and these low scoring games like Monday night tend to reverse themselves. I trust the Celtics to get their points tonight a lot more than I trust the Pacers, so taking Celtics team total over 106 looks pretty solid to me as long as they do not shoot 36% again from the field. It will be a MAX Limit Play for me.
Just something to consider. BOL tonight LC!!!
Are you sure they'll win though..........
0
Quote Originally Posted by In2it:
Something to consider tonight with the Celtics.
In 27 of Boston's last 28 home games that they won this year prior to Monday night, the Celtics scored more than 106 points, which is their Team Total tonight.
This is a pretty strong and meaningful trend and these low scoring games like Monday night tend to reverse themselves. I trust the Celtics to get their points tonight a lot more than I trust the Pacers, so taking Celtics team total over 106 looks pretty solid to me as long as they do not shoot 36% again from the field. It will be a MAX Limit Play for me.
Certainly changes the strength of the trend, but many of the home games they lost were games where they had more than 106 points.....15 minutes after I posted this their total went to 107.
0
Quote Originally Posted by theclaw:
Are you sure they'll win though..........
Certainly changes the strength of the trend, but many of the home games they lost were games where they had more than 106 points.....15 minutes after I posted this their total went to 107.
Truly feel for anyone who had $ on Indiana in that game, that was a gut wrenching ending to watch knowing the spread. Seems this happens in the NBA all the time now
0
Truly feel for anyone who had $ on Indiana in that game, that was a gut wrenching ending to watch knowing the spread. Seems this happens in the NBA all the time now
Sydneys Best....... I note your comments on LC incredibly picking teams whether thery win or not, they appear to win the 1st qtr, well two of LC's last picks Utah and Clippers both well beaten in the 1st qtr, maybe I'm just picking up on 2 and not the full picture but Jazz very slow starters normally.....
0
Sydneys Best....... I note your comments on LC incredibly picking teams whether thery win or not, they appear to win the 1st qtr, well two of LC's last picks Utah and Clippers both well beaten in the 1st qtr, maybe I'm just picking up on 2 and not the full picture but Jazz very slow starters normally.....
Why in the world are they implementing this useless defensive gameplan again that clearly didn't work in game 1. I can't believe they aren't just playing their normal defense.
0
Why in the world are they implementing this useless defensive gameplan again that clearly didn't work in game 1. I can't believe they aren't just playing their normal defense.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.