Finally good night with nice profit after 3-4 poor and unlucky days.
1-0 last night. +3.50 units.
NBA Season 2017 YTD 46-50 (+37.89 units)
5u 0-0 4u 1-0 3u 6-6 (incl. 0-1 plays with odds >3.0) 2u 27-23 (incl. 3-10 plays with odds >3.0) 1u 12-21 (plays with odds ~ >3.0)
For today I'll probably be again on under in SAS - Brk game. Surprisingly now line is only 210.0 points, so maybe it's worth to wait to see how it will change during the day, I mean in my opinion should go up. This level of line can indicate that under is the play. But it's still plenty of time to decide.
GL!
0
JJJ-3J
Aussie
StephanBoy85
Finally good night with nice profit after 3-4 poor and unlucky days.
1-0 last night. +3.50 units.
NBA Season 2017 YTD 46-50 (+37.89 units)
5u 0-0 4u 1-0 3u 6-6 (incl. 0-1 plays with odds >3.0) 2u 27-23 (incl. 3-10 plays with odds >3.0) 1u 12-21 (plays with odds ~ >3.0)
For today I'll probably be again on under in SAS - Brk game. Surprisingly now line is only 210.0 points, so maybe it's worth to wait to see how it will change during the day, I mean in my opinion should go up. This level of line can indicate that under is the play. But it's still plenty of time to decide.
Out of 10 games in my opinion Dal would win once or twice in these circumstances so I think that odds have value, and were even better (over 10.0). Somehow I also feel that 2nd half will belong to Dal. We'll see. GL!
GL everyone
0
Saturday plays:
SAS - Brk Nets under 210.0 (3 units) - 1.91
Cha Hornets 1H ML (1 unit) - 2.87
Dal Mavericks ML (1 unit) - 9.00
Out of 10 games in my opinion Dal would win once or twice in these circumstances so I think that odds have value, and were even better (over 10.0). Somehow I also feel that 2nd half will belong to Dal. We'll see. GL!
As huskerfan5b wrote, I play a lot of dogs. This year I managed to hit plays with odds >5.00 and also many ML's around odds 3.00, so despite not very good record (46-54) I was able to record quite significant profit (over 30 units). It was even better, but last week was rather poor for me.
Just analyze few pages of my topic. Everything is transparent and summarized after each day.
GL!
0
motowner
As huskerfan5b wrote, I play a lot of dogs. This year I managed to hit plays with odds >5.00 and also many ML's around odds 3.00, so despite not very good record (46-54) I was able to record quite significant profit (over 30 units). It was even better, but last week was rather poor for me.
Just analyze few pages of my topic. Everything is transparent and summarized after each day.
You are not up 31 units with a 46-54 record. Just look at the summary of your 1 to 5 unit plays and the records beside them.
You are:
+4 units on 4u plays -3 units on 3u plays +6 units on 2u plays -11 units on 1u plays
Total that up and you are down -4 units overall NOT counting juice. Add in the juice lost on your 54 losses and you're down about -15 units in total.
So where does this "+30.89 units" units figure come from?
He sure is up that many units..This guy is a underdog genius. Other posters on covers whinge and moan all the time that fav's are winning but Pete hits the underdog ML all the time. Mostly 1H bets and even though his record is less than 50%, he still is up more units that most people on covers because of the dog ML he hits..
0
Quote Originally Posted by motowner:
You are not up 31 units with a 46-54 record. Just look at the summary of your 1 to 5 unit plays and the records beside them.
You are:
+4 units on 4u plays -3 units on 3u plays +6 units on 2u plays -11 units on 1u plays
Total that up and you are down -4 units overall NOT counting juice. Add in the juice lost on your 54 losses and you're down about -15 units in total.
So where does this "+30.89 units" units figure come from?
He sure is up that many units..This guy is a underdog genius. Other posters on covers whinge and moan all the time that fav's are winning but Pete hits the underdog ML all the time. Mostly 1H bets and even though his record is less than 50%, he still is up more units that most people on covers because of the dog ML he hits..
I've been following for a while and think you do a really good job in your capping.
That being said, I don't understand why you keep playing the Nets/Under which seems like VERY often. They play NO defense yet can score against pretty much anyone.
0
Pete,
I've been following for a while and think you do a really good job in your capping.
That being said, I don't understand why you keep playing the Nets/Under which seems like VERY often. They play NO defense yet can score against pretty much anyone.
Last few days were rather poor for me, I lost around 10-15 units. But this is inevitable consequence of my strategy. I have very good periods in which I try to maximize profit and use my confidence but then comes correction and worse period with worse bets selection. It's rather impossible to be able to hit high odds plays regularly. So far it's profitable and I don't put much attention to my record but to my result in terms of units.
Maybe it's also good moment to make short summary:
Units placed: 180.00 Units won: 210.89 ROI: 17.16%
WinstonTheWolf
Some time ago I noticed that Brooklyn played several games with Western Conference teams and thought that lines for their next games, especially with Eastern Conference teams, are inflated due to prior results. It was correct assumption in next 2 games with Milwaukee, but then indeed this logic failed. Yesterday I liked under because of high line and fact that Hou in last games had not so high results. It looked really good after 1st half but 3rd quarter and then 4th quarter spoiled it. I'll definitely limit playing these unders.
GL!
0
Aussie thank you very much for your comment.
Last few days were rather poor for me, I lost around 10-15 units. But this is inevitable consequence of my strategy. I have very good periods in which I try to maximize profit and use my confidence but then comes correction and worse period with worse bets selection. It's rather impossible to be able to hit high odds plays regularly. So far it's profitable and I don't put much attention to my record but to my result in terms of units.
Maybe it's also good moment to make short summary:
Units placed: 180.00 Units won: 210.89 ROI: 17.16%
WinstonTheWolf
Some time ago I noticed that Brooklyn played several games with Western Conference teams and thought that lines for their next games, especially with Eastern Conference teams, are inflated due to prior results. It was correct assumption in next 2 games with Milwaukee, but then indeed this logic failed. Yesterday I liked under because of high line and fact that Hou in last games had not so high results. It looked really good after 1st half but 3rd quarter and then 4th quarter spoiled it. I'll definitely limit playing these unders.
Some time ago I noticed that Brooklyn played several games with Western Conference teams and thought that lines for their next games, especially with Eastern Conference teams, are inflated due to prior results. It was correct assumption in next 2 games with Milwaukee, but then indeed this logic failed. Yesterday I liked under because of high line and fact that Hou in last games had not so high results. It looked really good after 1st half but 3rd quarter and then 4th quarter spoiled it. I'll definitely limit playing these unders.
GL!
I think logic was good and did not necessarily fail because of those results
Of course WinstonTheWolf's observation is correct, but lines adjust accordingly and value (if any) is more likely to be found betting the under
nice ROI btw
0
Quote Originally Posted by Pistol_Pete_44:
Aussie thank you very much for your comment.
WinstonTheWolf
Some time ago I noticed that Brooklyn played several games with Western Conference teams and thought that lines for their next games, especially with Eastern Conference teams, are inflated due to prior results. It was correct assumption in next 2 games with Milwaukee, but then indeed this logic failed. Yesterday I liked under because of high line and fact that Hou in last games had not so high results. It looked really good after 1st half but 3rd quarter and then 4th quarter spoiled it. I'll definitely limit playing these unders.
GL!
I think logic was good and did not necessarily fail because of those results
Of course WinstonTheWolf's observation is correct, but lines adjust accordingly and value (if any) is more likely to be found betting the under
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.